These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27697875)

  • 1. Current practices in patient-reported outcome (PRO) data collection in clinical trials: a cross-sectional survey of UK trial staff and management.
    Kyte D; Ives J; Draper H; Calvert M
    BMJ Open; 2016 Oct; 6(10):e012281. PubMed ID: 27697875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Management of Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Alerts in Clinical Trials: A Cross Sectional Survey.
    Kyte D; Ives J; Draper H; Calvert M
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0144658. PubMed ID: 26785084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inconsistencies in quality of life data collection in clinical trials: a potential source of bias? Interviews with research nurses and trialists.
    Kyte D; Ives J; Draper H; Keeley T; Calvert M
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e76625. PubMed ID: 24124580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Collection and Reporting of Patient-reported Outcome Measures in Arthroplasty Registries: Multinational Survey and Recommendations.
    Bohm ER; Kirby S; Trepman E; Hallstrom BR; Rolfson O; Wilkinson JM; Sayers A; Overgaard S; Lyman S; Franklin PD; Dunn J; Denissen G; W-Dahl A; Ingelsrud LH; Navarro RA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Oct; 479(10):2151-2166. PubMed ID: 34288899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiple imputation for patient reported outcome measures in randomised controlled trials: advantages and disadvantages of imputing at the item, subscale or composite score level.
    Rombach I; Gray AM; Jenkinson C; Murray DW; Rivero-Arias O
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Aug; 18(1):87. PubMed ID: 30153796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic review of the use of translated patient-reported outcome measures in cancer trials.
    Slade AL; Retzer A; Ahmed K; Kyte D; Keeley T; Armes J; Brown JM; Calman L; Gavin A; Glaser AW; Greenfield DM; Lanceley A; Taylor RM; Velikova G; Turner G; Calvert MJ
    Trials; 2021 Apr; 22(1):306. PubMed ID: 33902699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. General practitioners' views on use of patient reported outcome measures in primary care: a cross-sectional survey and qualitative study.
    Turner GM; Litchfield I; Finnikin S; Aiyegbusi OL; Calvert M
    BMC Fam Pract; 2020 Jan; 21(1):14. PubMed ID: 31980021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What Do Orthopaedists Believe is Needed for Incorporating Patient-reported Outcome Measures into Clinical Care? A Qualitative Study.
    Whitebird RR; Solberg LI; Ziegenfuss JY; Norton CK; Chrenka EA; Swiontkowski M; Reams M; Grossman ES
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Apr; 480(4):680-687. PubMed ID: 34846308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of patient-reported outcome protocol content and reporting in UK cancer clinical trials: the EPiC study qualitative protocol.
    Retzer A; Keeley T; Ahmed K; Armes J; Brown JM; Calman L; Copland C; Efficace F; Gavin A; Glaser A; Greenfield DM; Lanceley A; Taylor RM; Velikova G; Brundage M; Mercieca-Bebber R; King MT; Calvert M; Kyte D
    BMJ Open; 2018 Feb; 8(2):e017282. PubMed ID: 29431123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identifying research priorities for effective retention strategies in clinical trials.
    Kearney A; Daykin A; Shaw ARG; Lane AJ; Blazeby JM; Clarke M; Williamson P; Gamble C
    Trials; 2017 Aug; 18(1):406. PubMed ID: 28859674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in routine head and neck cancer care: What do health professionals perceive as barriers and facilitators?
    Nguyen H; Butow P; Dhillon H; Morris L; Brown A; West K; Sundaresan P
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2020 Oct; 64(5):704-710. PubMed ID: 32394587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to promote quality of care in the management of patients with established kidney disease requiring treatment with haemodialysis in the UK (PROM-HD): a qualitative study protocol.
    Anderson NE; Calvert M; Cockwell P; Dutton M; Aiyegbusi OL; Kyte D
    BMJ Open; 2018 Oct; 8(10):e021532. PubMed ID: 30373779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Knowledge, use and attitudes of healthcare professionals towards patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at a comprehensive cancer center.
    Brunelli C; Zito E; Alfieri S; Borreani C; Roli A; Caraceni A; Apolone G
    BMC Cancer; 2022 Feb; 22(1):161. PubMed ID: 35144569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychometric validation of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQv2) in the context of the NHS Coronary Revascularisation PROMs Pilot.
    Schroter S; Miles R; Green S; Jackson M
    BMJ Open; 2017 Feb; 7(2):e015915. PubMed ID: 28246146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Association Between Patient Experience With Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements and Overall Satisfaction With Care in Neurology.
    Lapin BR; Honomichl RD; Thompson NR; Rose S; Sugano D; Udeh B; Katzan IL
    Value Health; 2019 May; 22(5):555-563. PubMed ID: 31104734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Large variation in use of patient-reported outcome measures: A survey of 188 foot and ankle surgeons.
    Zwiers R; Weel H; Mallee WH; Kerkhoffs GMMJ; van Dijk CN;
    Foot Ankle Surg; 2018 Jun; 24(3):246-251. PubMed ID: 29409251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. International perspectives on suboptimal patient-reported outcome trial design and reporting in cancer clinical trials: A qualitative study.
    Retzer A; Calvert M; Ahmed K; Keeley T; Armes J; Brown JM; Calman L; Gavin A; Glaser AW; Greenfield DM; Lanceley A; Taylor RM; Velikova G; Brundage M; Efficace F; Mercieca-Bebber R; King MT; Kyte D
    Cancer Med; 2021 Aug; 10(16):5475-5487. PubMed ID: 34219395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. PROM Validation Using Paper-Based or Online Surveys: Data Collection Methods Affect the Sociodemographic and Health Profile of the Sample.
    Rowen D; Carlton J; Elliott J
    Value Health; 2019 Aug; 22(8):845-850. PubMed ID: 31426923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the Population-Based Usage and Benefit of Digitally Collected Patient-Reported Outcomes and Experiences in Patients With Chronic Diseases: The PROMchronic Study Protocol.
    Nikkhah J; Steinbeck V; Grobe TG; Breitkreuz T; Pross C; Busse R
    JMIR Res Protoc; 2024 Aug; 13():e56487. PubMed ID: 39102279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Poor quality patient reported outcome measures bias effect estimates in orthopaedic randomized studies.
    Gagnier JJ; Johnston BC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Dec; 116():36-38. PubMed ID: 31374331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.