237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27698013)
1. Relationships Between Older Drivers' Cognitive Abilities as Assessed on the MoCA and Glance Patterns During Visual-Manual Radio Tuning While Driving.
Lee J; Mehler B; Reimer B; Ebe K; Coughlin JF
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2018 Sep; 73(7):1190-1197. PubMed ID: 27698013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Glass half-full: On-road glance metrics differentiate crashes from near-crashes in the 100-Car data.
Seppelt BD; Seaman S; Lee J; Angell LS; Mehler B; Reimer B
Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Oct; 107():48-62. PubMed ID: 28787612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Examining drivers' eye glance patterns during distracted driving: Insights from scanning randomness and glance transition matrix.
Wang Y; Bao S; Du W; Ye Z; Sayer JR
J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():149-155. PubMed ID: 29203013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How safe is tuning a radio?: using the radio tuning task as a benchmark for distracted driving.
Lee JY; Lee JD; Bärgman J; Lee J; Reimer B
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jan; 110():29-37. PubMed ID: 29101787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The correlation between drivers' road familiarity and glance behavior using real vehicle experimental data and mathematical models.
Huang J; Hu Y; Hu L; Guo G; Gao K
Traffic Inj Prev; 2024; 25(5):705-713. PubMed ID: 38709142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does order matter? Investigating the effect of sequence on glance duration during on-road driving.
Lee J; Roberts SC; Reimer B; Mehler B
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171730. PubMed ID: 28158301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Looking out or Looking Away?-Exploring the Impact of Driving With a Passenger on Young Drivers' Eye Glance Behavior.
Mehrotra S; Zhang F; Roberts SC
Hum Factors; 2023 Nov; 65(7):1306-1322. PubMed ID: 35466736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of brief visual interruption tasks on drivers' ability to resume their visual search for a pre-cued hazard.
Borowsky A; Horrey WJ; Liang Y; Garabet A; Simmons L; Fisher DL
Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Aug; 93():207-216. PubMed ID: 27209155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Drivers' visual scanning behavior at signalized and unsignalized intersections: A naturalistic driving study in China.
Li G; Wang Y; Zhu F; Sui X; Wang N; Qu X; Green P
J Safety Res; 2019 Dec; 71():219-229. PubMed ID: 31862033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Changes over 12 months in eye glances during secondary task engagement among novice drivers.
O'Brien F; Klauer SG; Ehsani J; Simons-Morton BG
Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Aug; 93():48-54. PubMed ID: 27177392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of off-path glances: A quantitative analysis of rear-end conflicts involving Chinese professional truck drivers as the striking partners.
Pipkorn L; Bianchi Piccinini G
J Safety Res; 2020 Feb; 72():259-266. PubMed ID: 32199571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of an in-vehicle eco-safe driving system on drivers' glance behaviour.
Li X; Vaezipour A; Rakotonirainy A; Demmel S
Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jan; 122():143-152. PubMed ID: 30384084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Keep your eyes on the road: young driver crash risk increases according to duration of distraction.
Simons-Morton BG; Guo F; Klauer SG; Ehsani JP; Pradhan AK
J Adolesc Health; 2014 May; 54(5 Suppl):S61-7. PubMed ID: 24759443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of momentary visual disruption on hazard anticipation and awareness in driving.
Borowsky A; Horrey WJ; Liang Y; Garabet A; Simmons L; Fisher DL
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 24697569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Effect of Partial Automation on Driver Attention: A Naturalistic Driving Study.
Gaspar J; Carney C
Hum Factors; 2019 Dec; 61(8):1261-1276. PubMed ID: 30920852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors affecting drivers' off-road glance behavior while interacting with in-vehicle voice interfaces.
Zhang F; Roberts SC
Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Jan; 179():106883. PubMed ID: 36356510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A model for naturalistic glance behavior around Tesla Autopilot disengagements.
Morando A; Gershon P; Mehler B; Reimer B
Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Oct; 161():106348. PubMed ID: 34492560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Driving Characteristics of Older Drivers and Their Relationship to the Useful Field of View Test.
Dukic Willstrand T; Broberg T; Selander H
Gerontology; 2017; 63(2):180-188. PubMed ID: 27764828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Drivers' gaze patterns when resuming control with a head-up-display: Effects of automation level and time budget.
Xu C; Louw TL; Merat N; Li P; Hu M; Li Y
Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Feb; 180():106905. PubMed ID: 36508949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using European naturalistic driving data to assess secondary task engagement when stopped at a red light.
Morgenstern T; Petzoldt T; Krems JF; Naujoks F; Keinath A
J Safety Res; 2020 Jun; 73():235-243. PubMed ID: 32563398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
