These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27698013)

  • 21. Examining physiological responses across different driving maneuvers during an on-road driving task: a pilot study comparing older and younger drivers.
    Koppel S; Kuo J; Berecki-Gisolf J; Boag R; Hue YX; Charlton JL
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16():225-33. PubMed ID: 24949653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sequential in-vehicle glance distributions: an alternative approach for analyzing glance data.
    Yamani Y; Horrey WJ; Liang Y; Fisher DL
    Hum Factors; 2015 Jun; 57(4):567-72. PubMed ID: 25977319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Towards unpacking older drivers' visual-motor coordination: A gaze-based integrated driving assessment.
    Sun QC; Xia JC; He J; Foster J; Falkmer T; Lee H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Apr; 113():85-96. PubMed ID: 29407672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Driver response and recovery following automation initiated disengagement in real-world hands-free driving.
    Gershon P; Mehler B; Reimer B
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(4):356-361. PubMed ID: 36988583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Driver's adaptive glance behavior to in-vehicle information systems.
    Peng Y; Boyle LN
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Dec; 85():93-101. PubMed ID: 26406538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Changes in glance behaviour when using a visual eco-driving system - A field study.
    Ahlstrom C; Kircher K
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Jan; 58():414-423. PubMed ID: 27633238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Are child occupants a significant source of driving distraction?
    Koppel S; Charlton J; Kopinathan C; Taranto D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 May; 43(3):1236-44. PubMed ID: 21376923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Identifying cognitive distraction using steering wheel reversal rates.
    Kountouriotis GK; Spyridakos P; Carsten OMJ; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Nov; 96():39-45. PubMed ID: 27497055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Distracted Driving, Visual Inattention, and Crash Risk Among Teenage Drivers.
    Gershon P; Sita KR; Zhu C; Ehsani JP; Klauer SG; Dingus TA; Simons-Morton BG
    Am J Prev Med; 2019 Apr; 56(4):494-500. PubMed ID: 30799162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An Attention Assessment for Informing Older Drivers' Crash Risks in Various Hazardous Situations.
    Choi H; Kasko J; Feng J
    Gerontologist; 2019 Jan; 59(1):112-123. PubMed ID: 30007354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Secondary Behavior of Drivers on Cell Phones.
    Farmer CM; Klauer SG; McClafferty JA; Guo F
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16(8):801-8. PubMed ID: 25793432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Older driver distraction: a naturalistic study of behaviour at intersections.
    Charlton JL; Catchlove M; Scully M; Koppel S; Newstead S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Sep; 58():271-8. PubMed ID: 23332726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Age differences in the takeover of vehicle control and engagement in non-driving-related activities in simulated driving with conditional automation.
    Clark H; Feng J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Sep; 106():468-479. PubMed ID: 27686942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Differences in glance behavior between drivers using a rearview camera, parking sensor system, both technologies, or no technology during low-speed parking maneuvers.
    Kidd DG; McCartt AT
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Feb; 87():92-101. PubMed ID: 26656150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Effect of Secondary Task Engagement on Adolescents' Driving Performance and Crash Risk.
    Klauer SG; Ehsani JP; McGehee DV; Manser M
    J Adolesc Health; 2015 Jul; 57(1 Suppl):S36-43. PubMed ID: 26112736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Ability of the Maze Navigation Test, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and Trail Making Tests A & B to predict on-road driving performance in current drivers diagnosed with dementia.
    Ma'u E; Cheung G
    N Z Med J; 2020 Apr; 133(1513):23-32. PubMed ID: 32325465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The relationship between cognitive performance, perceptions of driving comfort and abilities, and self-reported driving restrictions among healthy older drivers.
    Rapoport MJ; Naglie G; Weegar K; Myers A; Cameron D; Crizzle A; Korner-Bitensky N; Tuokko H; Vrkljan B; Bédard M; Porter MM; Mazer B; Gélinas I; Man-Son-Hing M; Marshall S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Dec; 61():288-95. PubMed ID: 23601097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of visual complexity of in-vehicle information display: Age-related differences in visual search task in the driving context.
    Lee SC; Kim YW; Ji YG
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Nov; 81():102888. PubMed ID: 31422256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The impact of billboards on driver visual behavior: a systematic literature review.
    Decker JS; Stannard SJ; McManus B; Wittig SM; Sisiopiku VP; Stavrinos D
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16():234-9. PubMed ID: 25000270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Using SHRP 2 naturalistic driving data to assess drivers' speed choice while being engaged in different secondary tasks.
    Schneidereit T; Petzoldt T; Keinath A; Krems JF
    J Safety Res; 2017 Sep; 62():33-42. PubMed ID: 28882275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.