241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27698258)
1. Time-Varying Distortions of Binaural Information by Bilateral Hearing Aids: Effects of Nonlinear Frequency Compression.
Brown AD; Rodriguez FA; Portnuff CD; Goupell MJ; Tollin DJ
Trends Hear; 2016 Oct; 20():. PubMed ID: 27698258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors.
Laback B; Pok SM; Baumgartner WD; Deutsch WA; Schmid K
Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):488-500. PubMed ID: 15599195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transmission of Binaural Cues by Bilateral Cochlear Implants: Examining the Impacts of Bilaterally Independent Spectral Peak-Picking, Pulse Timing, and Compression.
Gray WO; Mayo PG; Goupell MJ; Brown AD
Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211030411. PubMed ID: 34293981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Horizontal sound localization in cochlear implant users with a contralateral hearing aid.
Veugen LCE; Hendrikse MME; van Wanrooij MM; Agterberg MJH; Chalupper J; Mens LHM; Snik AFM; John van Opstal A
Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 336():72-82. PubMed ID: 27178443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Localization and interaural time difference (ITD) thresholds for cochlear implant recipients with preserved acoustic hearing in the implanted ear.
Gifford RH; Grantham DW; Sheffield SW; Davis TJ; Dwyer R; Dorman MF
Hear Res; 2014 Jun; 312():28-37. PubMed ID: 24607490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Envelope coding in the lateral superior olive. I. Sensitivity to interaural time differences.
Joris PX; Yin TC
J Neurophysiol; 1995 Mar; 73(3):1043-62. PubMed ID: 7608754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intracochlear Measurements of Interaural Time and Level Differences Conveyed by Bilateral Bone Conduction Systems.
Farrell NF; Banakis Hartl RM; Benichoux V; Brown AD; Cass SP; Tollin DJ
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Dec; 38(10):1476-1483. PubMed ID: 29084088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of extreme adaptive frequency compression in bimodal listeners on sound localization and speech perception.
Veugen LCE; Chalupper J; Mens LHM; Snik AFM; van Opstal AJ
Cochlear Implants Int; 2017 Sep; 18(5):266-277. PubMed ID: 28726592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Coherent Coding of Enhanced Interaural Cues Improves Sound Localization in Noise With Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
Williges B; Jürgens T; Hu H; Dietz M
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518781746. PubMed ID: 29956589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
Kan A; Litovsky RY; Goupell MJ
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e62-8. PubMed ID: 25565660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lateralization of interimplant timing and level differences in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.
Salloum CA; Valero J; Wong DD; Papsin BC; van Hoesel R; Gordon KA
Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):441-56. PubMed ID: 20489647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Binaural sensitivity in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.
Ehlers E; Goupell MJ; Zheng Y; Godar SP; Litovsky RY
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4264. PubMed ID: 28618809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Binaural-cue Weighting and Training-Induced Reweighting Across Frequencies.
Klingel M; Laback B
Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221104872. PubMed ID: 35791626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Binaural hearing is impaired in children with hearing loss who use bilateral hearing aids.
Gorodensky JH; Alemu RZ; Gill SS; Sandor MT; Papsin BC; Cushing SL; Gordon KA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Dec; 146(6):4352. PubMed ID: 31893744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Envelope coding in the lateral superior olive. II. Characteristic delays and comparison with responses in the medial superior olive.
Joris PX
J Neurophysiol; 1996 Oct; 76(4):2137-56. PubMed ID: 8899590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on the salience of binaural cues in conditions that simulate bilateral cochlear-implant listening.
Goupell MJ; Stoelb C; Kan A; Litovsky RY
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2272-87. PubMed ID: 23556595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lateralization of virtual sound sources with a binaural cochlear-implant sound coding strategy inspired by the medial olivocochlear reflex.
Lopez-Poveda EA; Eustaquio-Martín A; Fumero MJ; Stohl JS; Schatzer R; Nopp P; Wolford RD; Gorospe JM; Polo R; Revilla AG; Wilson BS
Hear Res; 2019 Aug; 379():103-116. PubMed ID: 31150955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Binaural hearing in children using Gaussian enveloped and transposed tones.
Ehlers E; Kan A; Winn MB; Stoelb C; Litovsky RY
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Apr; 139(4):1724. PubMed ID: 27106319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Neural and behavioral sensitivity to interaural time differences using amplitude modulated tones with mismatched carrier frequencies.
Blanks DA; Roberts JM; Buss E; Hall JW; Fitzpatrick DC
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 8(3):393-408. PubMed ID: 17657543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reweighting of Binaural Localization Cues in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.
Klingel M; Laback B
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Feb; 23(1):119-136. PubMed ID: 34812980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]