BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27698440)

  • 1. Long-term oncological outcomes of apical positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy in the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital cohort.
    Wadhwa H; Terris MK; Aronson WJ; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Cooperberg MR; Freedland SJ; Abern MR
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2016 Dec; 19(4):423-428. PubMed ID: 27698440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy patients do not predict long-term oncological outcomes: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) cohort.
    Mithal P; Howard LE; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Cooperberg MR; Kane CJ; Amling C; Freedland SJ
    BJU Int; 2016 Feb; 117(2):244-8. PubMed ID: 26010160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of Multifocality and Multilocation of Positive Surgical Margin After Radical Prostatectomy on Predicting Oncological Outcome.
    Wu S; Lin SX; Wirth GJ; Lu M; Lu J; Subtelny AO; Wang Z; Dahl DM; Olumi AF; Wu CL
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Feb; 17(1):e44-e52. PubMed ID: 30287224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radical prostatectomy and the effect of close surgical margins: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.
    Herforth C; Stroup SP; Chen Z; Howard LE; Freedland SJ; Moreira DM; Terris MK; Aronson WJ; Cooperberg MR; Amling CL; Kane CJ
    BJU Int; 2018 Oct; 122(4):592-598. PubMed ID: 29473992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on biochemical recurrence in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
    Preisser F; Coxilha G; Heinze A; Oh S; Chun FK; Sauter G; Pompe RS; Huland H; Graefen M; Tilki D
    Prostate; 2019 Dec; 79(16):1832-1836. PubMed ID: 31553506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of solitary and multiple positive surgical margins on hard clinical end points in 1712 adjuvant treatment-naive pT2-4 N0 radical prostatectomy patients.
    Mauermann J; Fradet V; Lacombe L; Dujardin T; Tiguert R; Tetu B; Fradet Y
    Eur Urol; 2013 Jul; 64(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 22901983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Defining Clinically Meaningful Positive Surgical Margins in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for Localised Prostate Cancer.
    Martini A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Scuderi S; Bravi CA; Mazzone E; Stabile A; Scarcella S; Robesti D; Barletta F; Cucchiara V; Mirone V; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Feb; 4(1):42-48. PubMed ID: 31411971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk of biochemical recurrence based on extent and location of positive surgical margins after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Marcq G; Michelet A; Hannink G; Rizk J; Sauvain J; Villers A; Saffarini M; Rochat CH
    BMC Cancer; 2018 Dec; 18(1):1291. PubMed ID: 30587172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prostate carcinoma with positive margins at radical prostatectomy: role of tumour zonal origin in biochemical recurrence.
    O'Neil LM; Walsh S; Cohen RJ; Lee S
    BJU Int; 2015 Oct; 116 Suppl 3():42-8. PubMed ID: 26218868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Site of positive surgical margins influences biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Godoy G; Tareen BU; Lepor H
    BJU Int; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1610-4. PubMed ID: 19549257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Significant reduction in positive surgical margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by application of the modified surgical margin recommendations of the 2009 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus.
    Maxeiner A; Magheli A; Jöhrens K; Kilic E; Braun TL; Kempkensteffen C; Hinz S; Stephan C; Miller K; Busch J
    BJU Int; 2016 Nov; 118(5):750-757. PubMed ID: 26915345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surgical margin length and location affect recurrence rates after robotic prostatectomy.
    Dev HS; Wiklund P; Patel V; Parashar D; Palmer K; Nyberg T; Skarecky D; Neal DE; Ahlering T; Sooriakumaran P
    Urol Oncol; 2015 Mar; 33(3):109.e7-13. PubMed ID: 25512161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Close surgical margins after radical prostatectomy mimic biochemical recurrence rates of positive margins.
    Whalen MJ; Shapiro EY; Rothberg MB; Turk AT; Woldu SL; Roy Choudhury A; Patel T; Badani KK
    Urol Oncol; 2015 Nov; 33(11):494.e9-494.e14. PubMed ID: 26259665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome.
    De La Roca RL; Da Cunha IW; Bezerra SM; Da Fonseca FP
    Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 25010296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
    Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
    BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy among pT2 and pT3a prostate cancer.
    Oh JJ; Hong SK; Byun SS; Choe G; Lee SE
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Jul; 31(5):595-600. PubMed ID: 21658977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identification of patients at risk for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy with intra-operative frozen section.
    Tully KH; Schulmeyer M; Hanske J; Reike MJ; Brock M; Moritz R; Jütte H; Tannapfel A; von Bodman C; Noldus J; Palisaar RJ; Roghmann F
    BJU Int; 2021 Nov; 128(5):598-606. PubMed ID: 33961328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of the extent and location of positive surgical margins on the risk of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy in men with Gleason 7 prostate cancers.
    Matti B; Reeves F; Prouse M; Zargar-Shoshtari K
    Prostate; 2021 Dec; 81(16):1428-1434. PubMed ID: 34570379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radical prostatectomy: positive surgical margins matter.
    Meeks JJ; Eastham JA
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Oct; 31(7):974-9. PubMed ID: 22244265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.