These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Developing end-point methods for absolute binding free energy calculation using the Boltzmann-quasiharmonic model. Wickstrom L; Gallicchio E; Chen L; Kurtzman T; Deng N Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2022 Mar; 24(10):6037-6052. PubMed ID: 35212338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Lessons learned from comparing molecular dynamics engines on the SAMPL5 dataset. Shirts MR; Klein C; Swails JM; Yin J; Gilson MK; Mobley DL; Case DA; Zhong ED J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):147-161. PubMed ID: 27787702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Converging free energies of binding in cucurbit[7]uril and octa-acid host-guest systems from SAMPL4 using expanded ensemble simulations. Monroe JI; Shirts MR J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2014 Apr; 28(4):401-15. PubMed ID: 24610238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Binding of carboxylate and trimethylammonium salts to octa-acid and TEMOA deep-cavity cavitands. Sullivan MR; Sokkalingam P; Nguyen T; Donahue JP; Gibb BC J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):21-28. PubMed ID: 27432339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Predicting binding affinities of host-guest systems in the SAMPL3 blind challenge: the performance of relative free energy calculations. König G; Brooks BR J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 May; 26(5):543-50. PubMed ID: 22198474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of the umbrella sampling and the double decoupling method in binding free energy predictions for SAMPL6 octa-acid host-guest challenges. Nishikawa N; Han K; Wu X; Tofoleanu F; Brooks BR J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1075-1086. PubMed ID: 30324304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prediction of CB[8] host-guest binding free energies in SAMPL6 using the double-decoupling method. Han K; Hudson PS; Jones MR; Nishikawa N; Tofoleanu F; Brooks BR J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1059-1073. PubMed ID: 30084077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Force matching as a stepping stone to QM/MM CB[8] host/guest binding free energies: a SAMPL6 cautionary tale. Hudson PS; Han K; Woodcock HL; Brooks BR J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):983-999. PubMed ID: 30276502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Prediction of SAMPL4 host-guest binding affinities using funnel metadynamics. Hsiao YW; Söderhjelm P J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2014 Apr; 28(4):443-54. PubMed ID: 24535628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Free Energy Calculations Using the Movable Type Method with Molecular Dynamics Driven Protein-Ligand Sampling. Liu W; Liu Z; Liu H; Westerhoff LM; Zheng Z J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Nov; 62(22):5645-5665. PubMed ID: 36282990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. An overview of the SAMPL8 host-guest binding challenge. Amezcua M; Setiadi J; Ge Y; Mobley DL J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2022 Oct; 36(10):707-734. PubMed ID: 36229622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Testing automatic methods to predict free binding energy of host-guest complexes in SAMPL7 challenge. Serillon D; Bo C; Barril X J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Feb; 35(2):209-222. PubMed ID: 33464434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Grid inhomogeneous solvation theory: hydration structure and thermodynamics of the miniature receptor cucurbit[7]uril. Nguyen CN; Young TK; Gilson MK J Chem Phys; 2012 Jul; 137(4):044101. PubMed ID: 22852591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Application of the alchemical transfer and potential of mean force methods to the SAMPL8 host-guest blinded challenge. Azimi S; Wu JZ; Khuttan S; Kurtzman T; Deng N; Gallicchio E J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2022 Jan; 36(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 35059940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]