These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27699847)
1. Detecting the native ligand orientation by interfacial rigidity: SiteInterlock. Raschka S; Bemister-Buffington J; Kuhn LA Proteins; 2016 Dec; 84(12):1888-1901. PubMed ID: 27699847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA. Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. CLUB-MARTINI: Selecting Favourable Interactions amongst Available Candidates, a Coarse-Grained Simulation Approach to Scoring Docking Decoys. Hou Q; Lensink MF; Heringa J; Feenstra KA PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155251. PubMed ID: 27166787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Beware of machine learning-based scoring functions-on the danger of developing black boxes. Gabel J; Desaphy J; Rognan D J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2807-15. PubMed ID: 25207678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. GalaxyDock BP2 score: a hybrid scoring function for accurate protein-ligand docking. Baek M; Shin WH; Chung HW; Seok C J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jul; 31(7):653-666. PubMed ID: 28623486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Knowledge-based scoring functions in drug design: 3. A two-dimensional knowledge-based hydrogen-bonding potential for the prediction of protein-ligand interactions. Zheng M; Xiong B; Luo C; Li S; Liu X; Shen Q; Li J; Zhu W; Luo X; Jiang H J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Nov; 51(11):2994-3004. PubMed ID: 21999432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Binding affinity prediction for protein-ligand complexes based on β contacts and B factor. Liu Q; Kwoh CK; Li J J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3076-85. PubMed ID: 24191692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A combinatorial scoring function for protein-RNA docking. Zhang Z; Lu L; Zhang Y; Hua Li C; Wang CX; Zhang XY; Tan JJ Proteins; 2017 Apr; 85(4):741-752. PubMed ID: 28120375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Scoring functions for prediction of protein-ligand interactions. Wang JC; Lin JH Curr Pharm Des; 2013; 19(12):2174-82. PubMed ID: 23016847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. GeauxDock: A novel approach for mixed-resolution ligand docking using a descriptor-based force field. Ding Y; Fang Y; Feinstein WP; Ramanujam J; Koppelman DM; Moreno J; Brylinski M; Jarrell M J Comput Chem; 2015 Oct; 36(27):2013-26. PubMed ID: 26250822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nonlinear scoring functions for similarity-based ligand docking and binding affinity prediction. Brylinski M J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3097-112. PubMed ID: 24171431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computational method to identify druggable binding sites that target protein-protein interactions. Li H; Kasam V; Tautermann CS; Seeliger D; Vaidehi N J Chem Inf Model; 2014 May; 54(5):1391-400. PubMed ID: 24762202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Template-Based Method for Conformation Generation and Scoring for Congeneric Series of Ligands. Raman EP J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Jun; 59(6):2690-2701. PubMed ID: 31045363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Protein-ligand-based pharmacophores: generation and utility assessment in computational ligand profiling. Meslamani J; Li J; Sutter J; Stevens A; Bertrand HO; Rognan D J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Apr; 52(4):943-55. PubMed ID: 22480372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]