These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27699847)

  • 1. Detecting the native ligand orientation by interfacial rigidity: SiteInterlock.
    Raschka S; Bemister-Buffington J; Kuhn LA
    Proteins; 2016 Dec; 84(12):1888-1901. PubMed ID: 27699847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.
    Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CLUB-MARTINI: Selecting Favourable Interactions amongst Available Candidates, a Coarse-Grained Simulation Approach to Scoring Docking Decoys.
    Hou Q; Lensink MF; Heringa J; Feenstra KA
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155251. PubMed ID: 27166787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Beware of machine learning-based scoring functions-on the danger of developing black boxes.
    Gabel J; Desaphy J; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2807-15. PubMed ID: 25207678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. GalaxyDock BP2 score: a hybrid scoring function for accurate protein-ligand docking.
    Baek M; Shin WH; Chung HW; Seok C
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jul; 31(7):653-666. PubMed ID: 28623486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Knowledge-based scoring functions in drug design: 3. A two-dimensional knowledge-based hydrogen-bonding potential for the prediction of protein-ligand interactions.
    Zheng M; Xiong B; Luo C; Li S; Liu X; Shen Q; Li J; Zhu W; Luo X; Jiang H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Nov; 51(11):2994-3004. PubMed ID: 21999432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Binding affinity prediction for protein-ligand complexes based on β contacts and B factor.
    Liu Q; Kwoh CK; Li J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3076-85. PubMed ID: 24191692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scoring confidence index: statistical evaluation of ligand binding mode predictions.
    Zavodszky MI; Stumpff-Kane AW; Lee DJ; Feig M
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2009 May; 23(5):289-99. PubMed ID: 19153808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ligand aligning method for molecular docking: alignment of property-weighted vectors.
    Joung JY; Nam KY; Cho KH; No KT
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Apr; 52(4):984-95. PubMed ID: 22471323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ligand-biased ensemble receptor docking (LigBEnD): a hybrid ligand/receptor structure-based approach.
    Lam PC; Abagyan R; Totrov M
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):187-198. PubMed ID: 28887659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A combinatorial scoring function for protein-RNA docking.
    Zhang Z; Lu L; Zhang Y; Hua Li C; Wang CX; Zhang XY; Tan JJ
    Proteins; 2017 Apr; 85(4):741-752. PubMed ID: 28120375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scoring functions for prediction of protein-ligand interactions.
    Wang JC; Lin JH
    Curr Pharm Des; 2013; 19(12):2174-82. PubMed ID: 23016847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Structural prediction of protein-RNA interaction by computational docking with propensity-based statistical potentials.
    Pérez-Cano L; Solernou A; Pons C; Fernández-Recio J
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2010; ():293-301. PubMed ID: 19908381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploring the stability of ligand binding modes to proteins by molecular dynamics simulations.
    Liu K; Watanabe E; Kokubo H
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Feb; 31(2):201-211. PubMed ID: 28074360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Protein-protein structure prediction by scoring molecular dynamics trajectories of putative poses.
    Sarti E; Gladich I; Zamuner S; Correia BE; Laio A
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84(9):1312-20. PubMed ID: 27253756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. GeauxDock: A novel approach for mixed-resolution ligand docking using a descriptor-based force field.
    Ding Y; Fang Y; Feinstein WP; Ramanujam J; Koppelman DM; Moreno J; Brylinski M; Jarrell M
    J Comput Chem; 2015 Oct; 36(27):2013-26. PubMed ID: 26250822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nonlinear scoring functions for similarity-based ligand docking and binding affinity prediction.
    Brylinski M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3097-112. PubMed ID: 24171431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computational method to identify druggable binding sites that target protein-protein interactions.
    Li H; Kasam V; Tautermann CS; Seeliger D; Vaidehi N
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 May; 54(5):1391-400. PubMed ID: 24762202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Template-Based Method for Conformation Generation and Scoring for Congeneric Series of Ligands.
    Raman EP
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Jun; 59(6):2690-2701. PubMed ID: 31045363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Protein-ligand-based pharmacophores: generation and utility assessment in computational ligand profiling.
    Meslamani J; Li J; Sutter J; Stevens A; Bertrand HO; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Apr; 52(4):943-55. PubMed ID: 22480372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.