These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27699847)

  • 21. Toward a unified scoring function for native state discrimination and drug-binding pocket recognition.
    Battisti A; Zamuner S; Sarti E; Laio A
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2018 Jun; 20(25):17148-17155. PubMed ID: 29900428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Knowledge of Native Protein-Protein Interfaces Is Sufficient To Construct Predictive Models for the Selection of Binding Candidates.
    Popov P; Grudinin S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Oct; 55(10):2242-55. PubMed ID: 26353078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. DrugScore(CSD)-knowledge-based scoring function derived from small molecule crystal data with superior recognition rate of near-native ligand poses and better affinity prediction.
    Velec HF; Gohlke H; Klebe G
    J Med Chem; 2005 Oct; 48(20):6296-303. PubMed ID: 16190756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Electrostatic Energy in Protein-Ligand Complexes.
    Bitencourt-Ferreira G; Veit-Acosta M; de Azevedo WF
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2053():67-77. PubMed ID: 31452099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Machine learning in computational docking.
    Khamis MA; Gomaa W; Ahmed WF
    Artif Intell Med; 2015 Mar; 63(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 25724101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. HotLig: a molecular surface-directed approach to scoring protein-ligand interactions.
    Wang SH; Wu YT; Kuo SC; Yu J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Aug; 53(8):2181-95. PubMed ID: 23862697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Efficient Approximation of Ligand Rotational and Translational Entropy Changes upon Binding for Use in MM-PBSA Calculations.
    Ben-Shalom IY; Pfeiffer-Marek S; Baringhaus KH; Gohlke H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Feb; 57(2):170-189. PubMed ID: 27996253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Molecular Modeling of Chemoreceptor:Ligand Interactions.
    Orr AA; Jayaraman A; Tamamis P
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1729():353-372. PubMed ID: 29429104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Convex-PL: a novel knowledge-based potential for protein-ligand interactions deduced from structural databases using convex optimization.
    Kadukova M; Grudinin S
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Oct; 31(10):943-958. PubMed ID: 28921375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Molecular binding sites are located near the interface of intrinsic dynamics domains (IDDs).
    Li H; Sakuraba S; Chandrasekaran A; Yang LW
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Aug; 54(8):2275-85. PubMed ID: 25089914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Aromatic interactions at the ligand-protein interface: Implications for the development of docking scoring functions.
    Brylinski M
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2018 Feb; 91(2):380-390. PubMed ID: 28816025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Protein-ligand docking against non-native protein conformers.
    Verdonk ML; Mortenson PN; Hall RJ; Hartshorn MJ; Murray CW
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Nov; 48(11):2214-25. PubMed ID: 18954138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power.
    Wang Z; Sun H; Yao X; Li D; Xu L; Li Y; Tian S; Hou T
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 May; 18(18):12964-75. PubMed ID: 27108770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Physics-based scoring of protein-ligand interactions: explicit polarizability, quantum mechanics and free energies.
    Bryce RA
    Future Med Chem; 2011 Apr; 3(6):683-98. PubMed ID: 21554075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Knowledge-guided docking: accurate prospective prediction of bound configurations of novel ligands using Surflex-Dock.
    Cleves AE; Jain AN
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2015 Jun; 29(6):485-509. PubMed ID: 25940276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An Overview of Scoring Functions Used for Protein-Ligand Interactions in Molecular Docking.
    Li J; Fu A; Zhang L
    Interdiscip Sci; 2019 Jun; 11(2):320-328. PubMed ID: 30877639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. In silico fragment-based drug discovery: setup and validation of a fragment-to-lead computational protocol using S4MPLE.
    Hoffer L; Renaud JP; Horvath D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Apr; 53(4):836-51. PubMed ID: 23537132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on an updated benchmark: 2. Evaluation methods and general results.
    Li Y; Han L; Liu Z; Wang R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jun; 54(6):1717-36. PubMed ID: 24708446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Computation of binding energies including their enthalpy and entropy components for protein-ligand complexes using support vector machines.
    Koppisetty CA; Frank M; Kemp GJ; Nyholm PG
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Oct; 53(10):2559-70. PubMed ID: 24050538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions.
    Warren GL; Andrews CW; Capelli AM; Clarke B; LaLonde J; Lambert MH; Lindvall M; Nevins N; Semus SF; Senger S; Tedesco G; Wall ID; Woolven JM; Peishoff CE; Head MS
    J Med Chem; 2006 Oct; 49(20):5912-31. PubMed ID: 17004707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.