These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27699847)

  • 41. An extensive and diverse set of molecular overlays for the validation of pharmacophore programs.
    Giangreco I; Cosgrove DA; Packer MJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Apr; 53(4):852-66. PubMed ID: 23565904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Statistical potential for modeling and ranking of protein-ligand interactions.
    Fan H; Schneidman-Duhovny D; Irwin JJ; Dong G; Shoichet BK; Sali A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Dec; 51(12):3078-92. PubMed ID: 22014038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Improving the scoring of protein-ligand binding affinity by including the effects of structural water and electronic polarization.
    Liu J; He X; Zhang JZ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jun; 53(6):1306-14. PubMed ID: 23651068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: a simplified potential approach.
    Muegge I; Martin YC
    J Med Chem; 1999 Mar; 42(5):791-804. PubMed ID: 10072678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. ROSETTALIGAND: protein-small molecule docking with full side-chain flexibility.
    Meiler J; Baker D
    Proteins; 2006 Nov; 65(3):538-48. PubMed ID: 16972285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Accommodating protein flexibility for structure-based drug design.
    Lin JH
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2011; 11(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 20939792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Steering protein-ligand docking with quantitative NMR chemical shift perturbations.
    González-Ruiz D; Gohlke H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Oct; 49(10):2260-71. PubMed ID: 19795907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. GSScore: a novel Graphormer-based shell-like scoring method for protein-ligand docking.
    Guo L; Wang J
    Brief Bioinform; 2024 Mar; 25(3):. PubMed ID: 38706316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A statistical rescoring scheme for protein-ligand docking: Consideration of entropic effect.
    Lee J; Seok C
    Proteins; 2008 Feb; 70(3):1074-83. PubMed ID: 18076034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Insights into the Molecular Mechanisms of Protein-Ligand Interactions by Molecular Docking and Molecular Dynamics Simulation: A Case of Oligopeptide Binding Protein.
    Fu Y; Zhao J; Chen Z
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2018; 2018():3502514. PubMed ID: 30627209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Ligand- and receptor-based docking with LiBELa.
    dos Santos Muniz H; Nascimento AS
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2015 Aug; 29(8):713-23. PubMed ID: 26141308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Structural and energy determinants in protein-RNA docking.
    Pérez-Cano L; Romero-Durana M; Fernández-Recio J
    Methods; 2017 Apr; 118-119():163-170. PubMed ID: 27816523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Properties that rank protein:protein docking poses with high accuracy.
    Simões ICM; Coimbra JTS; Neves RPP; Costa IPD; Ramos MJ; Fernandes PA
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2018 Aug; 20(32):20927-20942. PubMed ID: 30067268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. pyDock: electrostatics and desolvation for effective scoring of rigid-body protein-protein docking.
    Cheng TM; Blundell TL; Fernandez-Recio J
    Proteins; 2007 Aug; 68(2):503-15. PubMed ID: 17444519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Energy Minimization on Manifolds for Docking Flexible Molecules.
    Mirzaei H; Zarbafian S; Villar E; Mottarella S; Beglov D; Vajda S; Paschalidis ICh; Vakili P; Kozakov D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Mar; 11(3):1063-76. PubMed ID: 26478722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. FlexAID: Revisiting Docking on Non-Native-Complex Structures.
    Gaudreault F; Najmanovich RJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Jul; 55(7):1323-36. PubMed ID: 26076070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Predicting Binding Poses and Affinities in the CSAR 2013-2014 Docking Exercises Using the Knowledge-Based Convex-PL Potential.
    Grudinin S; Popov P; Neveu E; Cheremovskiy G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):1053-62. PubMed ID: 26569136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A Computational Investigation of Small-Molecule Engagement of Hot Spots at Protein-Protein Interaction Interfaces.
    Xu D; Si Y; Meroueh SO
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Sep; 57(9):2250-2272. PubMed ID: 28766941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. An interaction-motif-based scoring function for protein-ligand docking.
    Xie ZR; Hwang MJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Jun; 11():298. PubMed ID: 20525216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Maximum common binding modes (MCBM): consensus docking scoring using multiple ligand information and interaction fingerprints.
    Renner S; Derksen S; Radestock S; Mörchen F
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Feb; 48(2):319-32. PubMed ID: 18211051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.