200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27701010)
1. The development of the grasp height effect as a measure of efficient action planning in children.
Jovanovic B; Schwarzer G
J Exp Child Psychol; 2017 Jan; 153():74-82. PubMed ID: 27701010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of grasping habits and object orientation on motor planning in children and adults.
Jovanovic B; Schwarzer G
Dev Psychobiol; 2017 Dec; 59(8):949-957. PubMed ID: 29071707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dual-task interference in action programming and action planning - Evidence from the end-state comfort effect.
Löhr-Limpens M; Göhringer F; Schenk T
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2022 Aug; 228():103637. PubMed ID: 35690027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preschool children adapt grasping movements to upcoming object manipulations: Evidence from a dial rotation task.
Herbort O; Büschelberger J; Janczyk M
J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Mar; 167():62-77. PubMed ID: 29154031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Typical and atypical (cerebral palsy) development of unimanual and bimanual grasp planning.
Janssen L; Steenbergen B
Res Dev Disabil; 2011; 32(3):963-71. PubMed ID: 21353463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Where grasps are made reveals how grasps are planned: generation and recall of motor plans.
Cohen RG; Rosenbaum DA
Exp Brain Res; 2004 Aug; 157(4):486-95. PubMed ID: 15071711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influences of grasp selection in typically developing children.
Wilmut K; Byrne M
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 May; 148():181-7. PubMed ID: 24594384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An investigation into manual asymmetries in grasp behavior and kinematics during an object manipulation task.
Seegelke C; Hughes CM; Schack T
Exp Brain Res; 2011 Nov; 215(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 21938544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Individual differences in motor planning during a multi-segment object manipulation task.
Seegelke C; Hughes CM; Schütz C; Schack T
Exp Brain Res; 2012 Oct; 222(1-2):125-36. PubMed ID: 22885998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. One hand, two hands, two people: Prospective sensorimotor control in children with autism.
Ansuini C; Podda J; Battaglia FM; Veneselli E; Becchio C
Dev Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Jan; 29():86-96. PubMed ID: 28292645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of reducing intermediate target constraints on grasp posture planning during a three-segment object manipulation task.
Seegelke C; Hughes CM; Knoblauch A; Schack T
Exp Brain Res; 2015 Feb; 233(2):529-38. PubMed ID: 25370347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The ontogeny of efficient second-order action planning: The developing interplay of controlled and habitual processes in goal-directed actions.
Melzel S; Paulus M
J Exp Child Psychol; 2022 Apr; 216():105339. PubMed ID: 34971974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Kinematic characteristics of second-order motor planning and performance in 6- and 10-year-old children and adults: Effects of age and task constraints.
Domellöf E; Bäckström A; Johansson AM; Rönnqvist L; von Hofsten C; Rosander K
Dev Psychobiol; 2020 Mar; 62(2):250-265. PubMed ID: 31502277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The development of end-state comfort planning in preschool children.
Weigelt M; Schack T
Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(6):476-782. PubMed ID: 20371425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inverting the planning gradient: adjustment of grasps to late segments of multi-step object manipulations.
Mathew H; Kunde W; Herbort O
Exp Brain Res; 2017 May; 235(5):1397-1409. PubMed ID: 28233050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of the reach-to-grasp movement between children and adults: a kinematic study.
Zoia S; Pezzetta E; Blason L; Scabar A; Carrozzi M; Bulgheroni M; Castiello U
Dev Neuropsychol; 2006; 30(2):719-38. PubMed ID: 16995833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of multiple planning constraints on the development of grasp posture planning in 6- to 10-year-old children.
Stöckel T; Hughes CM
Dev Psychol; 2015 Sep; 51(9):1254-61. PubMed ID: 26192045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of initial and final precision on motor planning: individual differences in end-state comfort during unimanual grasping and placing.
Hughes CM; Seegelke C; Schack T
J Mot Behav; 2012; 44(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 22551086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recall of observed actions modulates the end-state comfort effect just like recall of one's own actions.
Dignath D; Eder AB
Exp Brain Res; 2013 Nov; 231(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 24042215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Earlier and greater hand pre-shaping in the elderly: a study based on kinematic analysis of reaching movements to grasp objects.
Tamaru Y; Naito Y; Nishikawa T
Psychogeriatrics; 2017 Nov; 17(6):382-388. PubMed ID: 28295921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
