These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27701128)

  • 1. Histogram Planimetry Method for the Measurement of Irregular Wounds.
    Yesiloglu N; Yildiz K; Cem Akpinar A; Gorgulu T; Sirinoglu H; Ozcan A
    Wounds; 2016 Sep; 28(9):328-333. PubMed ID: 27701128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ways to increase precision and accuracy of wound area measurement using smart devices: Advanced app Planimator.
    Foltynski P
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0192485. PubMed ID: 29505569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Wound areas by computerized planimetry of digital images: accuracy and reliability.
    Mayrovitz HN; Soontupe LB
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2009 May; 22(5):222-9. PubMed ID: 19521289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Wound Area Measurement with Digital Planimetry: Improved Accuracy and Precision with Calibration Based on 2 Rulers.
    Foltynski P; Ladyzynski P; Ciechanowska A; Migalska-Musial K; Judzewicz G; Sabalinska S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0134622. PubMed ID: 26252747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of computer-assisted and manual wound size measurement.
    Thawer HA; Houghton PE; Woodbury MG; Keast D; Campbell K
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2002 Oct; 48(10):46-53. PubMed ID: 12378003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wound debridement: Comparative reliability of three methods for measuring fibrin percentage in chronic wounds.
    Laplaud AL; Blaizot X; Gaillard C; Morice A; Lebreuilly I; Clément C; Parienti JJ; Dompmartin A
    Wound Repair Regen; 2010; 18(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 20082676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An overview of techniques used to measure wound area and volume.
    Little C; McDonald J; Jenkins MG; McCarron P
    J Wound Care; 2009 Jun; 18(6):250-3. PubMed ID: 19661849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simulated Wound Assessment Using Digital Planimetry versus Three-Dimensional Cameras: Implications for Clinical Assessment.
    Williams KJ; Sounderajah V; Dharmarajah B; Thapar A; Davies AH
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2017 May; 41():235-240. PubMed ID: 28163180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional documentation of wound healing: first results of a new objective method for measurement.
    Körber A; Rietkötter J; Grabbe S; Dissemond J
    J Dtsch Dermatol Ges; 2006 Oct; 4(10):848-54. PubMed ID: 17010174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of a new laser beam wound camera and a digital photoplanimetry-based method for wound measurement in horses.
    Van Hecke LL; De Mil TA; Haspeslagh M; Chiers K; Martens AM
    Vet J; 2015 Mar; 203(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 25665920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Evolving Field of Wound Measurement Techniques: A Literature Review.
    Khoo R; Jansen S
    Wounds; 2016 Jun; 28(6):175-81. PubMed ID: 27377609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An assessment of the accuracy and usability of a novel optical wound measurement system.
    Bowling FL; King L; Fadavi H; Paterson JA; Preece K; Daniel RW; Matthews DJ; Boulton AJ
    Diabet Med; 2009 Jan; 26(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 19125768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computerized segmentation and measurement of chronic wound images.
    Ahmad Fauzi MF; Khansa I; Catignani K; Gordillo G; Sen CK; Gurcan MN
    Comput Biol Med; 2015 May; 60():74-85. PubMed ID: 25756704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two-dimensional wound measurement: comparison of 4 techniques.
    Langemo DK; Melland H; Hanson D; Olson B; Hunter S; Henly SJ
    Adv Wound Care; 1998; 11(7):337-43. PubMed ID: 10326350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Verge Videometer wound measurement package.
    Williams C
    Br J Nurs; 2000 Feb 24-Mar 8; 9(4):237-9. PubMed ID: 11033643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of Three - dimensional Wound Analyzer in the Small Wound Area Measurement during the Process of Wound Healing.
    Sheng J; Li H; Jin J; Liu T; Ma B; Liu G; Zhu S
    J Burn Care Res; 2018 Feb; 39(2):268-273. PubMed ID: 28557868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability of electronic versus manual wound measurement techniques.
    Haghpanah S; Bogie K; Wang X; Banks PG; Ho CH
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Oct; 87(10):1396-402. PubMed ID: 17023252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Wounds measured from digital photographs using photodigital planimetry software: validation and rater reliability.
    Wendelken ME; Berg WT; Lichtenstein P; Markowitz L; Comfort C; Alvarez OM
    Wounds; 2011 Sep; 23(9):267-75. PubMed ID: 25879267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital planimetry results in more accurate wound measurements: a comparison to standard ruler measurements.
    Rogers LC; Bevilacqua NJ; Armstrong DG; Andros G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2010 Jul; 4(4):799-802. PubMed ID: 20663440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Methods to assess area and volume of wounds - a systematic review.
    Jørgensen LB; Sørensen JA; Jemec GB; Yderstraede KB
    Int Wound J; 2016 Aug; 13(4):540-53. PubMed ID: 26250714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.