These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27702446)

  • 1. The effect of mark enhancement techniques on the subsequent detection of saliva.
    McAllister P; Graham E; Deacon P; Farrugia KJ
    Sci Justice; 2016 Sep; 56(5):305-320. PubMed ID: 27702446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of mark enhancement techniques on the subsequent detection of semen/spermatozoa.
    Simmons R; Deacon P; Phillips DJ; Farrugia K
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Nov; 244():231-46. PubMed ID: 25277520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of mark enhancement techniques on the presumptive and confirmatory tests for blood.
    Stewart V; Deacon P; Zahra N; Uchimoto ML; Farrugia KJ
    Sci Justice; 2018 Nov; 58(6):386-396. PubMed ID: 30446067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhancement of fingermarks and visualizing DNA.
    Kanokwongnuwut P; Kirkbride KP; Kobus H; Linacre A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jul; 300():99-105. PubMed ID: 31085432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Direct-STR typing from presumptively-tested and untreated body fluids.
    Thanakiatkrai P; Raham K; Pradutkanchana J; Sotthibandhu S; Kitpipit T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Sep; 30():1-9. PubMed ID: 28605649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The evaluation and validation of Phadebas
    Wornes DJ; Speers SJ; Murakami JA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Jul; 288():81-88. PubMed ID: 29734053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fingerprint enhancement revisited and the effects of blood enhancement chemicals on subsequent profiler Plus fluorescent short tandem repeat DNA analysis of fresh and aged bloody fingerprints.
    Frégeau CJ; Germain O; Fourney RM
    J Forensic Sci; 2000 Mar; 45(2):354-80. PubMed ID: 10782955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An assessment of a portable cyanoacrylate fuming system (LumiFume™) for the development of latent fingermarks.
    Jones C; Fraser J; Deacon P; Lindsay M; Carlysle-Davies F; Farrugia KJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Dec; 305():109966. PubMed ID: 31629199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison between atmospheric/humidity and vacuum cyanoacrylate fuming of latent fingermarks.
    Farrugia KJ; Fraser J; Friel L; Adams D; Attard-Montalto N; Deacon P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Dec; 257():54-70. PubMed ID: 26282511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An investigation into the enhancement of fingermarks in blood on fruit and vegetables.
    Rae L; Gentles D; Farrugia KJ
    Sci Justice; 2013 Sep; 53(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 23937941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the effect of ozone disinfection on forensic identification of blood, saliva, and semen stains.
    Fejes V; Simon G; Makszin L; Sipos K; Poor VS
    Sci Justice; 2024 Mar; 64(2):151-158. PubMed ID: 38431372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection and identification of body fluid stains using antibody-nanoparticle conjugates.
    Frascione N; Thorogate R; Daniel B; Jickells S
    Analyst; 2012 Jan; 137(2):508-12. PubMed ID: 22117199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Wet powder suspensions as an additional technique for the enhancement of bloodied marks.
    Au C; Jackson-Smith H; Quinones I; Jones BJ; Daniel B
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Jan; 204(1-3):13-8. PubMed ID: 20494531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acid phosphatase test on Phadebas
    Herman Y; Feine I; Gafny R
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Jul; 288():218-222. PubMed ID: 29775922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantifying DNA loss in laboratory-created latent prints due to fingerprint processing.
    Carlin M; Nickel R; Halstead K; Viray J; Hall A; Ehrlich A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Mar; 344():111595. PubMed ID: 36805977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Chemical enhancement techniques of bloodstain patterns and DNA recovery after fire exposure.
    Tontarski KL; Hoskins KA; Watkins TG; Brun-Conti L; Michaud AL
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Jan; 54(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 19018938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Four Saliva Detection Methods to Identify Expectorated Blood Spatter.
    Park HY; Son BN; Seo YI; Lim SK
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Nov; 60(6):1571-6. PubMed ID: 26212779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of modern techniques for saliva screening.
    Myers JR; Adkins WK
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jul; 53(4):862-7. PubMed ID: 18503523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Applicability of two commercially available kits for forensic identification of saliva stains.
    Pang BC; Cheung BK
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Sep; 53(5):1117-22. PubMed ID: 18637870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Compatibility of DNA IQ™, QIAamp
    Lin SW; Ip SC; Lam TT; Tan TF; Yeung WL; Tam WM
    Int J Legal Med; 2017 Mar; 131(2):293-301. PubMed ID: 27654715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.