These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27702454)

  • 1. What should a forensic practitioner's likelihood ratio be?
    Morrison GS; Enzinger E
    Sci Justice; 2016 Sep; 56(5):374-379. PubMed ID: 27702454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What should a forensic practitioner's likelihood ratio be? II.
    Morrison GS
    Sci Justice; 2017 Nov; 57(6):472-476. PubMed ID: 29173462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the likelihood of "encapsulating all uncertainty".
    Martire KA; Edmond G; Navarro DJ; Newell BR
    Sci Justice; 2017 Jan; 57(1):76-79. PubMed ID: 28063591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Posterior distributions for likelihood ratios in forensic science.
    van den Hout A; Alberink I
    Sci Justice; 2016 Sep; 56(5):397-401. PubMed ID: 27702459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An empirical estimate of the precision of likelihood ratios from a forensic-voice-comparison system.
    Morrison GS; Zhang C; Rose P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 May; 208(1-3):59-65. PubMed ID: 21131149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measuring the validity and reliability of forensic likelihood-ratio systems.
    Morrison GS
    Sci Justice; 2011 Sep; 51(3):91-8. PubMed ID: 21889105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Discussion on how to implement a verbal scale in a forensic laboratory: Benefits, pitfalls and suggestions to avoid misunderstandings.
    Marquis R; Biedermann A; Cadola L; Champod C; Gueissaz L; Massonnet G; Mazzella WD; Taroni F; Hicks T
    Sci Justice; 2016 Sep; 56(5):364-370. PubMed ID: 27702452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of relevant data, quantitative measurements, and statistical models to calculate a likelihood ratio for a Chinese forensic voice comparison case involving two sisters.
    Zhang C; Morrison GS; Enzinger E
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Oct; 267():115-124. PubMed ID: 27592142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sampling variability in forensic likelihood-ratio computation: A simulation study.
    Ali T; Spreeuwers L; Veldhuis R; Meuwly D
    Sci Justice; 2015 Dec; 55(6):499-508. PubMed ID: 26654086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the interpretation of likelihood ratios in forensic science evidence: Presentation formats and the weak evidence effect.
    Martire KA; Kemp RI; Sayle M; Newell BR
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Jul; 240():61-8. PubMed ID: 24814330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identical twins in forensic genetics - Epidemiology and risk based estimation of weight of evidence.
    Tvedebrink T; Morling N
    Sci Justice; 2015 Dec; 55(6):408-14. PubMed ID: 26654075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perception problems of the verbal scale: A reanalysis and application of a membership function approach.
    Martire KA; Watkins I
    Sci Justice; 2015 Jul; 55(4):264-73. PubMed ID: 26087874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Issues and opportunities: the application of the numerical likelihood ratio framework to forensic speaker comparison.
    Gold E; Hughes V
    Sci Justice; 2014 Jul; 54(4):292-9. PubMed ID: 25002047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. National Academy of Sciences "standardization": on what terms?
    Bunch AW
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jul; 59(4):1041-5. PubMed ID: 24854677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of LA-ICP-MS databases to calculate likelihood ratios for the forensic analysis of glass evidence.
    Corzo R; Hoffman T; Weis P; Franco-Pedroso J; Ramos D; Almirall J
    Talanta; 2018 Aug; 186():655-661. PubMed ID: 29784417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Refining the relevant population in forensic voice comparison - A response to Hicks et alii (2015) The importance of distinguishing information from evidence/observations when formulating propositions.
    Morrison GS; Enzinger E; Zhang C
    Sci Justice; 2016 Dec; 56(6):492-497. PubMed ID: 27914557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using subsampling to estimate the strength of handwriting evidence via score-based likelihood ratios.
    Davis LJ; Saunders CP; Hepler A; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Mar; 216(1-3):146-57. PubMed ID: 22018850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How can courts take into account the uncertainty in a likelihood ratio?
    Taylor D; Balding D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Sep; 48():102361. PubMed ID: 32769057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian interpretation of discrete class characteristics.
    McNevin D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Nov; 292():125-130. PubMed ID: 30296628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lay understanding of forensic statistics: Evaluation of random match probabilities, likelihood ratios, and verbal equivalents.
    Thompson WC; Newman EJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Aug; 39(4):332-49. PubMed ID: 25984887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.