These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27703695)

  • 1. US line-ups outperform UK line-ups.
    Seale-Carlisle TM; Mickes L
    R Soc Open Sci; 2016 Sep; 3(9):160300. PubMed ID: 27703695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of sleep on eyewitness identifications.
    Morgan DP; Tamminen J; Seale-Carlisle TM; Mickes L
    R Soc Open Sci; 2019 Dec; 6(12):170501. PubMed ID: 31903193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Double-blind photo lineups using actual eyewitnesses: an experimental test of a sequential versus simultaneous lineup procedure.
    Wells GL; Steblay NK; Dysart JE
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 24933175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating the reliability of eyewitness identifications from police lineups.
    Wixted JT; Mickes L; Dunn JC; Clark SE; Wells W
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Jan; 113(2):304-9. PubMed ID: 26699467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Models of lineup memory.
    Wixted JT; Vul E; Mickes L; Wilson BM
    Cogn Psychol; 2018 Sep; 105():81-114. PubMed ID: 30032063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A signal-detection-based diagnostic-feature-detection model of eyewitness identification.
    Wixted JT; Mickes L
    Psychol Rev; 2014 Apr; 121(2):262-76. PubMed ID: 24730600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Eyewitness Evidence: Improving Its Probative Value.
    Wells GL; Memon A; Penrod SD
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2006 Nov; 7(2):45-75. PubMed ID: 26158855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of multiple show-ups on eyewitness decision-making and innocence risk.
    Smith AM; Bertrand M; Lindsay RC; Kalmet N; Grossman D; Provenzano D
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2014 Sep; 20(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 24820149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Unfair Lineups Make Witnesses More Likely to Confuse Innocent and Guilty Suspects.
    Colloff MF; Wade KA; Strange D
    Psychol Sci; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1227-39. PubMed ID: 27458070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New signal detection theory-based framework for eyewitness performance in lineups.
    Lee J; Penrod SD
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Oct; 43(5):436-454. PubMed ID: 31368723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A signal-detection analysis of eyewitness identification across the adult lifespan.
    Colloff MF; Wade KA; Wixted JT; Maylor EA
    Psychol Aging; 2017 May; 32(3):243-258. PubMed ID: 28504536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rethinking the Reliability of Eyewitness Memory.
    Wixted JT; Mickes L; Fisher RP
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2018 May; 13(3):324-335. PubMed ID: 29716454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Eyewitness identification in simultaneous and sequential lineups: an investigation of position effects using receiver operating characteristics.
    Meisters J; Diedenhofen B; Musch J
    Memory; 2018 Oct; 26(9):1297-1309. PubMed ID: 29676666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Relationship Between Eyewitness Confidence and Identification Accuracy: A New Synthesis.
    Wixted JT; Wells GL
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2017 May; 18(1):10-65. PubMed ID: 28395650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Behavioral confirmation in the interrogation room: on the dangers of presuming guilt.
    Kassin SM; Goldstein CC; Savitsky K
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Apr; 27(2):187-203. PubMed ID: 12733421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of eyewitness memory: comparing the diagnostic accuracy of simultaneous versus sequential lineups.
    Mickes L; Flowe HD; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Dec; 18(4):361-76. PubMed ID: 23294282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ROC curve analyses of eyewitness identification decisions: An analysis of the recent debate.
    Rotello CM; Chen T
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2016; 1(1):10. PubMed ID: 28180161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Theoretical vs. empirical discriminability: the application of ROC methods to eyewitness identification.
    Wixted JT; Mickes L
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2018; 3(1):9. PubMed ID: 29577072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does video recording alter the behavior of police during interrogation? A mock crime-and-investigation study.
    Kassin SM; Kukucka J; Lawson VZ; DeCarlo J
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Feb; 38(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 23876091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Blame Conformity: Innocent Bystanders Can Be Blamed for a Crime as a Result of Misinformation from a Young, but Not Elderly, Adult Co-Witness.
    Thorley C
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0134739. PubMed ID: 26230523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.