121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27704153)
1. In the footsteps of Bonney and Nichols: hysterectomy during surgical repair of pelvic organ prolapse.
Serati M; Rizk D; Savatore S
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Jun; 28(6):823-825. PubMed ID: 27704153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Impact of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy With Suspension of the Uterosacral Ligaments on Sexual Function in Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Comparative Study.
Detollenaere RJ; Kreuwel IA; Dijkstra JR; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
J Sex Med; 2016 Feb; 13(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 26805940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Complications and objective outcomes of uterine preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse versus procedures removing the Uterus, a systematic review.
Azadi A; Marchand G; Masoud AT; Sainz K; Govindan M; Ware K; King A; Ruther S; Brazil G; Calteux N; Ulibarri H; Parise J; Arroyo A; Coriell C; Goetz S; Ostergard DR
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Dec; 267():90-98. PubMed ID: 34736035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Does hysterectomy modifies the anatomical and functional outcomes of prolapse surgery?: Clinical Practice Guidelines].
Cayrac M; Warembourg S; Le Normand L; Fatton B
Prog Urol; 2016 Jul; 26 Suppl 1():S73-88. PubMed ID: 27595628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.
Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Uterine preservation for advanced pelvic organ prolapse repair: Anatomical results and patient satisfaction.
Fink K; Shachar IB; Braun NM
Int Braz J Urol; 2016; 42(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 27564289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hysteropexy: an Option for the Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Bradley S; Gutman RE; Richter LA
Curr Urol Rep; 2018 Feb; 19(2):15. PubMed ID: 29476274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Anatomic outcomes after pelvic-organ-prolapse surgery: comparing uterine preservation with hysterectomy.
Marschalek J; Trofaier ML; Yerlikaya G; Hanzal E; Koelbl H; Ott J; Umek W
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Dec; 183():33-6. PubMed ID: 25461349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sacrospinous hysteropexy: review and meta-analysis of outcomes.
Kapoor S; Sivanesan K; Robertson JA; Veerasingham M; Kapoor V
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Sep; 28(9):1285-1294. PubMed ID: 28258346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.
Pan K; Cao L; Ryan NA; Wang Y; Xu H
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Jan; 27(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 26179552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surgery for women with pelvic organ prolapse with or without stress urinary incontinence.
Baessler K; Christmann-Schmid C; Maher C; Haya N; Crawford TJ; Brown J
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Aug; 8(8):CD013108. PubMed ID: 30121956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does the uterus need to be removed to correct uterovaginal prolapse?
Gutman RE
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 28(5):435-40. PubMed ID: 27467823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy for the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse: a prospective randomized pilot study.
Rahmanou P; Price N; Jackson SR
Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Nov; 26(11):1687-94. PubMed ID: 26142347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dutch women's attitudes towards hysterectomy and uterus preservation in surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
van IJsselmuiden MN; Detollenaere RJ; Gerritse MBE; Kluivers KB; Bongers MY; van Eijndhoven HWF
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Jan; 220():79-83. PubMed ID: 29175132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence].
Hu CD; Chen YS; Yi XF; Ding JX; Feng WW; Yao LQ; Huang J; Zhang Y; Hu WG; Zhu ZL; Hua KQ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 21426765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does prolapse equal hysterectomy? The role of uterine conservation in women with uterovaginal prolapse.
Ridgeway BM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Dec; 213(6):802-9. PubMed ID: 26226554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How do patients and surgeons decide on uterine preservation or hysterectomy in apical prolapse?
Anglim B; O'Sullivan O; O'Reilly B
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Aug; 29(8):1075-1079. PubMed ID: 29947819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Medium-term comparison of uterus preservation versus hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse treatment with Prolift™ mesh.
Huang LY; Chu LC; Chiang HJ; Chuang FC; Kung FT; Huang KH
Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Jul; 26(7):1013-20. PubMed ID: 25600353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Trocar-guided trans-vaginal mesh surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: effects on urinary continence and anatomical and functional outcomes. A prospective observational study.
Natale F; Costantini E; La Penna C; Illiano E; Balsamo R; Carbone A; Cervigni M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Mar; 210():29-34. PubMed ID: 27930942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality of life and pelvic floor dysfunction symptoms after hysterectomy with or without pelvic organ prolapse.
Humalajärvi N; Aukee P; Kairaluoma MV; Stach-Lempinen B; Sintonen H; Valpas A; Heinonen PK
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Nov; 182():16-21. PubMed ID: 25218547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
