These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2770437)
1. Guidelines to physicians on court subpoenas and testimony. Md Med J; 1989 Aug; 38(8):598-600. PubMed ID: 2770437 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Torts--medical malpractice--Court of Appeals of Maryland adopts doctrine of informed consent. Penhallegon JR Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1978; 8(1):114-29. PubMed ID: 11664978 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Court testimony: the physician as a witness; appellate judge's view. McCown H Nebr State Med J; 1969 May; 54(5):290-4. PubMed ID: 4239732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The physician in court. Beeman J Northwest Med; 1969 Apr; 68(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 5769746 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The biomedical researcher and subpoenas: judicial protection of confidential medical data. Holder AR Am J Law Med; 1986; 12(3-4):406-21. PubMed ID: 11644121 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Research records and subpoenas: a continuing issue. Holder AR IRB; 1993; 15(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 11651650 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The doctor in court. Fraser HA; Golding JS; Trotman D West Indian Med J; 1981 Jun; 30(2):55-6. PubMed ID: 7257339 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Jurisprudence in daily practice. In court]. Spann W MMW Munch Med Wochenschr; 1979 Oct; 121(41):39-40. PubMed ID: 114825 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Researchers and subpoenas: the troubling precedent of the Selikoff case. Holder AR IRB; 1989; 11(6):8-10. PubMed ID: 11650287 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Significance of medical testimony in social court trials. 1. Significance of medical testimony]. Hauffe R Fortschr Med; 1973 Nov; 91(33):1289-90. PubMed ID: 4765763 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Expert witness testimony: the ethics of being a medical expert witness. Andrew LB Emerg Med Clin North Am; 2006 Aug; 24(3):715-31. PubMed ID: 16877139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Expert testimony biased by the age of the testifyer]. Deglmann T Hefte Unfallheilkd; 1970; 102():202-6. PubMed ID: 5472294 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The doctor as an expert witness. Wilson N Z Med J; 1966 Aug; 65(408):538-41. PubMed ID: 5223730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [The practitioner and the expert testimony]. Cotte L Sem Hop; 1969 Apr; 45(20):1403-5. PubMed ID: 4307005 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Prosecutor Preference for Forensic Nurse Testimony: Outcome of Expanding a Forensic Program. Reed GD; Symonds A; Stier A; Peluso S; Watson SO J Emerg Nurs; 2020 May; 46(3):310-317. PubMed ID: 32389204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. When researchers are served subpoenas: case study. Holder AR IRB; 1985; 7(4):5-7. PubMed ID: 11650704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A review of the Burger Court: Part I. Parry J Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1984; 8(6):502-8. PubMed ID: 11658589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Where law and bioethics meet...and where they don't!! Sullivan MC; Reynolds DF Univ Detroit Mercy Law Rev; 1998; 75(3):607-20. PubMed ID: 12627575 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Environmental health. Lead paint experts face a barrage of subpoenas. Kaiser J Science; 2005 Jul; 309(5733):362-3. PubMed ID: 16020697 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]