These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27704506)

  • 1. Item analysis of examinations in the Faculty of Medicine of Tunis.
    Hermi A; Achour W
    Tunis Med; 2016 Apr; 94(4):247-252. PubMed ID: 27704506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multidisciplinary exams in medical studies : Interest of docimologic analysis.
    Ben Salah N; Salouage I; Hatira ZZ; Goucha R; Meherzi A; Kallel K
    Tunis Med; 2019 Jan; 97(1):93-99. PubMed ID: 31535699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Difficulty, discrimination and cognitive level of Microbiology exam questions of the Faculty of Medicine of Tunisia.
    Hermi A; Achour W
    Tunis Med; 2015; 93(8-9):487-90. PubMed ID: 26815509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Item Analysis of Multiple-Choice Questions in Teaching Prosthodontics.
    Madhav VN
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Nov; 79(11):1314-9. PubMed ID: 26522636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are faculty predictions or item taxonomies useful for estimating the outcome of multiple-choice examinations?
    Kibble JD; Johnson T
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2011 Dec; 35(4):396-401. PubMed ID: 22139777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical vignettes improve performance in anatomy practical assessment.
    Ikah DS; Finn GM; Swamy M; White PM; McLachlan JC
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 24953193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relationship between classical item characteristics and item response time on computer-based testing.
    Chae YM; Park SG; Park I
    Korean J Med Educ; 2019 Mar; 31(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 30852856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. OBJECTIVE MULTI-STATION CLINICAL EVALUATION IN PATHOLOGICAL ANATOMY. CRITICAL ANALYSIS AND PERCEPTION.
    Limaiem F; Farah F; Belkacem O; Bouraoui S; Achour W
    Tunis Med; 2020 Oct; 98(10):674-681. PubMed ID: 33479938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The objective clinical evaluation in multiple stations in nutrition : Docrimological analysis.
    Mahjoub F; Mizouri R; Ben Amor N; Ounaissa K; Achour W; Jamoussi H
    Tunis Med; 2020 Dec; 98(12):951-958. PubMed ID: 33479996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High-fidelity patient simulation: validation of performance checklists.
    Morgan PJ; Cleave-Hogg D; DeSousa S; Tarshis J
    Br J Anaesth; 2004 Mar; 92(3):388-92. PubMed ID: 14742327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimum accepted competency examination: test item analysis.
    McCrossan P; Nicholson A; McCallion N
    BMC Med Educ; 2022 May; 22(1):400. PubMed ID: 35614439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of an interactive teaching method in the teaching of Pulmonology.
    Yangui F; Charfi M; Abouda M; Ben Hmida A; Charfi MR
    Tunis Med; 2018 May; 96(5):259-263. PubMed ID: 30430497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Writing Multiple Choice Questions-Has the Student Become the Master?
    Pham H; Court-Kowalski S; Chan H; Devitt P
    Teach Learn Med; 2023; 35(3):356-367. PubMed ID: 35491868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship between item difficulty and discrimination indices in true/false-type multiple choice questions of a para-clinical multidisciplinary paper.
    Sim SM; Rasiah RI
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 2006 Feb; 35(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 16565756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do images influence assessment in anatomy? Exploring the effect of images on item difficulty and item discrimination.
    Vorstenbosch MA; Klaassen TP; Kooloos JG; Bolhuis SM; Laan RF
    Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 22674609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of item-writing flaws and item complexity on examination item difficulty and discrimination value.
    Rush BR; Rankin DC; White BJ
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Sep; 16(1):250. PubMed ID: 27681933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of images on item statistics in multiple choice anatomy examinations.
    Notebaert AJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jan; 10(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 27472765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Item analysis and evaluation in the examinations in the faculty of medicine at Ondokuz Mayis University.
    Tomak L; Bek Y
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2015; 18(3):387-94. PubMed ID: 25772924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Item development process and analysis of 50 case-based items for implementation on the Korean Nursing Licensing Examination.
    Park IS; Suh YO; Park HS; Kang SY; Kim KS; Kim GH; Choi YH; Kim HJ
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2017; 14():20. PubMed ID: 28900070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability of a 25-item low-stakes multiple-choice assessment of bronchoscopic knowledge.
    Quadrelli S; Davoudi M; Galíndez F; Colt HG
    Chest; 2009 Feb; 135(2):315-321. PubMed ID: 18849404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.