These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 277052)

  • 1. Therapeutic pulpotomies in primary molars with the formocresol technique. A clinical and histological follow-up.
    Magnusson BO
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1978; 36(3):157-65. PubMed ID: 277052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcome of formocresol/ZOE sub-base pulpotomies utilizing alternative radiographic success criteria.
    Strange DM; Seale NS; Nunn ME; Strange M
    Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(4):331-6. PubMed ID: 11572492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mineral trioxide aggregate vs. formocresol in pulpotomized primary molars: a preliminary report.
    Eidelman E; Holan G; Fuks AB
    Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 11242724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Formocresol pulpotomies in primary molars: a radiographic study in a pediatric dentistry practice.
    Hicks MJ; Barr ES; Flaitz CM
    J Pedod; 1986; 10(4):331-9. PubMed ID: 2980416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Primary molar pulp therapy--histological evaluation of failure.
    Waterhouse PJ; Nunn JH; Whitworth JM; Soames JV
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2000 Dec; 10(4):313-21. PubMed ID: 11310245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of pulpotomies in primary molars with formocresol, glutaraldehyde and ferric sulphate.
    Havale R; Anegundi RT; Indushekar K; Sudha P
    Oral Health Dent Manag; 2013 Mar; 12(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 23474578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulp medicaments for pulpotomies in primary molars.
    Noorollahian H
    Br Dent J; 2008 Jun; 204(11):E20. PubMed ID: 18425074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical, radiographic, and histopathologic evaluation of Nd:YAG laser pulpotomy on human primary teeth.
    Odabaş ME; Bodur H; Bariş E; Demir C
    J Endod; 2007 Apr; 33(4):415-21. PubMed ID: 17368330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical and radiographic comparison of primary molars after formocresol and electrosurgical pulpotomy: a randomized clinical trial.
    Bahrololoomi Z; Moeintaghavi A; Emtiazi M; Hosseini G
    Indian J Dent Res; 2008; 19(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 18797098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol pulpotomy of primary teeth: a 2-year follow-up.
    Ansari G; Ranjpour M
    Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 20518934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pulpal therapy for primary teeth: formocresol vs electrosurgery: a clinical study.
    Rivera N; Reyes E; Mazzaoui S; Morón A
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(1):71-3. PubMed ID: 12762614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulp-capping agents in pulpotomized primary teeth.
    Agamy HA; Bakry NS; Mounir MM; Avery DR
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(4):302-9. PubMed ID: 15344622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiographic changes following formocresol pulpotomy in primary molars.
    Willard RM
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1976; 43(6):414-5. PubMed ID: 789423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Light-cured calcium hydroxide vs formocresol in human primary molar pulpotomies: a randomized controlled trial.
    Zurn D; Seale NS
    Pediatr Dent; 2008; 30(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 18402097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Calcium hydroxide partial pulpotomy is an alternative to formocresol pulpotomy based on a 3-year randomized trial.
    Trairatvorakul C; Koothiratrakarn A
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2012 Sep; 22(5):382-9. PubMed ID: 22211737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Histological evaluation of electrosurgery and formocresol pulpotomy techniques in primary teeth in dogs.
    El-Meligy O; Abdalla M; El-Baraway S; El-Tekya M; Dean JA
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2001; 26(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 11688819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Formocresol, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Portland Cement, and Enamel Matrix Derivative in Primary Teeth Pulpotomies: A Two Year Follow-Up.
    Yildirim C; Basak F; Akgun OM; Polat GG; Altun C
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 26696101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sodium hypochlorite versus Formocresol in primary molars pulpotomies: a randomized clinical trial.
    Al-Mutairi MA; Bawazir OA
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Mar; 14(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 23597217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of electrosurgical and formocresol pulpotomy procedures in children.
    Dean JA; Mack RB; Fulkerson BT; Sanders BJ
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2002 May; 12(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 12028309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ferric sulphate and formocresol in pulpotomy of primary molars: long term follow-up study.
    Ibricevic H; Al-Jame Q
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2003 Mar; 4(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 12870985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.