BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27705955)

  • 1. Changing head model extent affects finite element predictions of transcranial direct current stimulation distributions.
    Indahlastari A; Chauhan M; Schwartz B; Sadleir RJ
    J Neural Eng; 2016 Dec; 13(6):066006. PubMed ID: 27705955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of electric field distribution in anisotropic cortical and subcortical regions under the influence of tDCS.
    Shahid S; Wen P; Ahfock T
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2014 Jan; 35(1):41-57. PubMed ID: 24122951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Benchmarking transcranial electrical stimulation finite element models: a comparison study.
    Indahlastari A; Chauhan M; Sadleir RJ
    J Neural Eng; 2019 Apr; 16(2):026019. PubMed ID: 30605892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of anisotropic conductivity in the skull and white matter on transcranial direct current stimulation via an anatomically realistic finite element head model.
    Suh HS; Lee WH; Kim TS
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(21):6961-80. PubMed ID: 23044667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in a realistic head model.
    Sadleir RJ; Vannorsdall TD; Schretlen DJ; Gordon B
    Neuroimage; 2010 Jul; 51(4):1310-8. PubMed ID: 20350607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The value and cost of complexity in predictive modelling: role of tissue anisotropic conductivity and fibre tracts in neuromodulation.
    Shahid SS; Bikson M; Salman H; Wen P; Ahfock T
    J Neural Eng; 2014 Jun; 11(3):036002. PubMed ID: 24737098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigation of tDCS volume conduction effects in a highly realistic head model.
    Wagner S; Rampersad SM; Aydin Ü; Vorwerk J; Oostendorp TF; Neuling T; Herrmann CS; Stegeman DF; Wolters CH
    J Neural Eng; 2014 Feb; 11(1):016002. PubMed ID: 24310982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multiscale coupling of transcranial direct current stimulation to neuron electrodynamics: modeling the influence of the transcranial electric field on neuronal depolarization.
    Dougherty ET; Turner JC; Vogel F
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2014; 2014():360179. PubMed ID: 25404950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of Electrode Drift in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
    Woods AJ; Bryant V; Sacchetti D; Gervits F; Hamilton R
    Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(3):515-9. PubMed ID: 25583653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Imaging of current flow in the human head during transcranial electrical therapy.
    Kasinadhuni AK; Indahlastari A; Chauhan M; Schär M; Mareci TH; Sadleir RJ
    Brain Stimul; 2017; 10(4):764-772. PubMed ID: 28457836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A guideline for head volume conductor modeling in EEG and MEG.
    Vorwerk J; Cho JH; Rampp S; Hamer H; Knösche TR; Wolters CH
    Neuroimage; 2014 Oct; 100():590-607. PubMed ID: 24971512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A flexible workflow for simulating transcranial electric stimulation in healthy and lesioned brains.
    Kalloch B; Bazin PL; Villringer A; Sehm B; Hlawitschka M
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0228119. PubMed ID: 32407389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Methods for high-resolution anisotropic finite element modeling of the human head: automatic MR white matter anisotropy-adaptive mesh generation.
    Lee WH; Kim TS
    Med Eng Phys; 2012 Jan; 34(1):85-98. PubMed ID: 21820347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comprehensive analysis of the impact of head model extent on electric field predictions in transcranial current stimulation.
    Callejón-Leblic MA; Miranda PC
    J Neural Eng; 2021 Mar; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 33647895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modeling transcranial DC stimulation.
    Oostendorp TF; Hengeveld YA; Wolters CH; Stinstra J; van Elswijk G; Stegeman DF
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():4226-9. PubMed ID: 19163645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of electrode-electrolyte spatial mismatch on transcranial direct current stimulation: a finite element modeling study.
    Chen L; Zou X; Tang R; Ke A; He J
    J Neural Eng; 2019 Aug; 16(5):056012. PubMed ID: 31195379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A simple method for EEG guided transcranial electrical stimulation without models.
    Cancelli A; Cottone C; Tecchio F; Truong DQ; Dmochowski J; Bikson M
    J Neural Eng; 2016 Jun; 13(3):036022. PubMed ID: 27172063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transcranial direct current stimulation in patients after decompressive craniectomy: a finite element model to investigate factors affecting the cortical electric field.
    Sun W; Dong X; Yu G; Shuai L; Yuan Y; Ma C
    J Int Med Res; 2021 Feb; 49(2):300060520942112. PubMed ID: 33788619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Pursuit of DLPFC: Non-neuronavigated Methods to Target the Left Dorsolateral Pre-frontal Cortex With Symmetric Bicephalic Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS).
    Seibt O; Brunoni AR; Huang Y; Bikson M
    Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(3):590-602. PubMed ID: 25862601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of gender-related differences in transcranial direct current stimulation: A Computational Study
    Thomas C; Ghodratitoostani I; Delbem ACB; Ali A; Datta A
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():5196-5199. PubMed ID: 31947029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.