186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27705955)
21. Influence of gender-related differences in transcranial direct current stimulation: A Computational Study
Thomas C; Ghodratitoostani I; Delbem ACB; Ali A; Datta A
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():5196-5199. PubMed ID: 31947029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Optimization of focality and direction in dense electrode array transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).
Guler S; Dannhauer M; Erem B; Macleod R; Tucker D; Turovets S; Luu P; Erdogmus D; Brooks DH
J Neural Eng; 2016 Jun; 13(3):036020. PubMed ID: 27152752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The electric field distributions in anatomical head models during transcranial direct current stimulation for post-stroke rehabilitation.
Manoli Z; Parazzini M; Ravazzani P; Samaras T
Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):262-271. PubMed ID: 28044315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Regional electric field induced by electroconvulsive therapy in a realistic finite element head model: influence of white matter anisotropic conductivity.
Lee WH; Deng ZD; Kim TS; Laine AF; Lisanby SH; Peterchev AV
Neuroimage; 2012 Feb; 59(3):2110-23. PubMed ID: 22032945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Enhanced tES and tDCS computational models by meninges emulation.
Jiang J; Truong DQ; Esmaeilpour Z; Huang Y; Badran BW; Bikson M
J Neural Eng; 2020 Jan; 17(1):016027. PubMed ID: 31689695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Simulating transcranial direct current stimulation with a detailed anisotropic human head model.
Rampersad SM; Janssen AM; Lucka F; Aydin Ü; Lanfer B; Lew S; Wolters CH; Stegeman DF; Oostendorp TF
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2014 May; 22(3):441-52. PubMed ID: 24760939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The effect of tissue anisotropy on the radial and tangential components of the electric field in transcranial direct current stimulation.
Metwally MK; Han SM; Kim TS
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2015 Oct; 53(10):1085-101. PubMed ID: 25940845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The effect of head and coil modeling for the calculation of induced electric field during transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Tachas NJ; Samaras T
Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Jul; 93(1):167-71. PubMed ID: 23872490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparison between block and smooth modeling in finite element simulations of tDCS.
Indahlastari A; Sadleir RJ
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():3403-6. PubMed ID: 26737023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effects of uncertainty in head tissue conductivity and complexity on EEG forward modeling in neonates.
Azizollahi H; Aarabi A; Wallois F
Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Oct; 37(10):3604-22. PubMed ID: 27238749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of the electric field in the brain during transcranial direct current stimulation: A sensitivity analysis.
Santos L; Martinho M; Salvador R; Wenger C; Fernandes SR; Ripolles O; Ruffini G; Miranda PC
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():1778-1781. PubMed ID: 28268672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Current Density Imaging During Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Using DT-MRI and MREIT: Algorithm Development and Numerical Simulations.
Kwon OI; Sajib SZ; Sersa I; Oh TI; Jeong WC; Kim HJ; Woo EJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2016 Jan; 63(1):168-75. PubMed ID: 26111387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Electric field and current density distribution in an anatomical head model during transcranial direct current stimulation for tinnitus treatment.
Parazzini M; Fiocchi S; Ravazzani P
Bioelectromagnetics; 2012 Sep; 33(6):476-87. PubMed ID: 22298345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Projected current density comparison in tDCS block and smooth FE modeling.
Indahlastari A; Chauhan M; Sadleir RJ
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():4079-4082. PubMed ID: 28269179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of cephalic and extracephalic montages for transcranial direct current stimulation--a numerical study.
Noetscher GM; Yanamadala J; Makarov SN; Pascual-Leone A
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2014 Sep; 61(9):2488-98. PubMed ID: 25014947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Visualization of the electric field evoked by transcranial electric stimulation during a craniotomy using the finite element method.
Tomio R; Akiyama T; Horikoshi T; Ohira T; Yoshida K
J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Dec; 256():157-67. PubMed ID: 26391774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Numerical investigation of white matter anisotropic conductivity in defining current distribution under tDCS.
Shahid S; Wen P; Ahfock T
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Jan; 109(1):48-64. PubMed ID: 23040278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with skull defects and skull plates: high-resolution computational FEM study of factors altering cortical current flow.
Datta A; Bikson M; Fregni F
Neuroimage; 2010 Oct; 52(4):1268-78. PubMed ID: 20435146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Does participant's age impact on tDCS induced fields? Insights from computational simulations.
McCann H; Beltrachini L
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2021 Jun; 7(4):. PubMed ID: 34038881
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. 3-D diffusion tensor MRI anisotropy content-adaptive finite element head model generation for bioelectromagnetic imaging.
Lee WH; Kim TS; Kim AT; Lee SY
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():4003-6. PubMed ID: 19163590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
