These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27706104)

  • 21. Chebyshev collocation spectral lattice Boltzmann method for simulation of low-speed flows.
    Hejranfar K; Hajihassanpour M
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2015 Jan; 91(1):013301. PubMed ID: 25679733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Microfluidic bead-based diodes with targeted circular microchannels for low Reynolds number applications.
    Sochol RD; Lu A; Lei J; Iwai K; Lee LP; Lin L
    Lab Chip; 2014 May; 14(9):1585-94. PubMed ID: 24632685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Viscous flow simulation in a stenosis model using discrete particle dynamics: a comparison between DPD and CFD.
    Feng R; Xenos M; Girdhar G; Kang W; Davenport JW; Deng Y; Bluestein D
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2012 Jan; 11(1-2):119-29. PubMed ID: 21369918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. 3D hydrodynamic focusing microfluidics for emerging sensing technologies.
    Daniele MA; Boyd DA; Mott DR; Ligler FS
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2015 May; 67():25-34. PubMed ID: 25041926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Numerical and experimental study of capillary-driven flow of PCR solution in hybrid hydrophobic microfluidic networks.
    Ramalingam N; Warkiani ME; Ramalingam N; Keshavarzi G; Hao-Bing L; Hai-Qing TG
    Biomed Microdevices; 2016 Aug; 18(4):68. PubMed ID: 27432321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An unsteady microfluidic T-form mixer perturbed by hydrodynamic pressure.
    Ma Y; Sun CP; Fields M; Li Y; Haake DA; Churchill BM; Ho CM
    J Micromech Microeng; 2008 Mar; 18():45015. PubMed ID: 19177174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Microfluid Switching-Induced Transient Refractive Interface.
    Tang J; Qiu G; Cao X; deMello A; Wang J
    ACS Sens; 2022 Nov; 7(11):3521-3529. PubMed ID: 36356161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Simulation of two-dimensional fully developed laminar flow for a magneto-hydrodynamic (MHD) pump.
    Wang PJ; Chang CY; Chang ML
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2004 Jul; 20(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 15142583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Real-time measurement of flow rate in microfluidic devices using a cantilever-based optofluidic sensor.
    Cheri MS; Latifi H; Sadeghi J; Moghaddam MS; Shahraki H; Hajghassem H
    Analyst; 2014 Jan; 139(2):431-8. PubMed ID: 24291805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evolution of channel flow and Darcy's law beyond the critical Reynolds number.
    Deng X; Sheng P
    Eur Phys J E Soft Matter; 2023 May; 46(6):37. PubMed ID: 37249683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Electroosmotic guiding of sample flows in a laminar flow chamber.
    Besselink GA; Vulto P; Lammertink RG; Schlautmann S; van den Berg A; Olthuis W; Engbers GH; Schasfoort RB
    Electrophoresis; 2004 Nov; 25(21-22):3705-11. PubMed ID: 15565693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Holographic fabrication of three-dimensional nanostructures for microfluidic passive mixing.
    Park SG; Lee SK; Moon JH; Yang SM
    Lab Chip; 2009 Nov; 9(21):3144-50. PubMed ID: 19823731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Inertial manipulation of bubbles in rectangular microfluidic channels.
    Hadikhani P; Hashemi SMH; Balestra G; Zhu L; Modestino MA; Gallaire F; Psaltis D
    Lab Chip; 2018 Mar; 18(7):1035-1046. PubMed ID: 29512658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Numerical simulation of undular jumps on graveled bed using volume of fluid method.
    Rostami F; Yazdi SR; Said MA; Shahrokhi M
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(5):909-17. PubMed ID: 22797216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. High throughput-per-footprint inertial focusing.
    Ciftlik AT; Ettori M; Gijs MA
    Small; 2013 Aug; 9(16):2764-73, 2828. PubMed ID: 23420756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Numerical and experimental evaluation of microfluidic sorting devices.
    Taylor JK; Ren CL; Stubley GD
    Biotechnol Prog; 2008; 24(4):981-91. PubMed ID: 19194907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Numerical calculation of the electroosmotic flow at the cross region in microfluidic chips.
    Jin Y; Luo GA
    Electrophoresis; 2003 Apr; 24(7-8):1242-52. PubMed ID: 12707918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An innovative hybrid 3D analytic-numerical model for air breathing parallel channel counter-flow PEM fuel cells.
    Tavčar G; Katrašnik T
    Acta Chim Slov; 2014; 61(2):284-301. PubMed ID: 25125112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Analysis and modeling of flow in rotating spiral microchannels: towards math-aided design of microfluidic systems using centrifugal pumping.
    Wang L; Kropinski MC; Li PC
    Lab Chip; 2011 Jun; 11(12):2097-108. PubMed ID: 21552608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Experimental investigation and computational modeling of hydrodynamics in bifurcating microchannels.
    Janakiraman V; Sastry S; Kadambi JR; Baskaran H
    Biomed Microdevices; 2008 Jun; 10(3):355-65. PubMed ID: 18175219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.