These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27706265)
1. Precision Fit of Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses Fabricated by CAD/CAM, Copy-Milling, and Conventional Methods. de França DG; Morais MH; das Neves FD; Carreiro AF; Barbosa GA Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(3):507–513. PubMed ID: 27706265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of CAD/CAM on the fit accuracy of implant-supported zirconia and cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses. de França DG; Morais MH; das Neves FD; Barbosa GA J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jan; 113(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 25277028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro fit of CAD-CAM complete arch screw-retained titanium and zirconia implant prostheses fabricated on 4 implants. Al-Meraikhi H; Yilmaz B; McGlumphy E; Brantley W; Johnston WM J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):409-416. PubMed ID: 28720339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks. Yilmaz B; Alshahrani FA; Kale E; Johnston WM J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Passivity of fit of CAD/CAM and copy-milled frameworks, veneered frameworks, and anatomically contoured, zirconia ceramic, implant-supported fixed prostheses. Karl M; Graef F; Wichmann M; Krafft T J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Apr; 107(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 22475466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Precision of fit of implant-supported screw-retained 10-unit computer-aided-designed and computer-aided-manufactured frameworks made from zirconium dioxide and titanium: an in vitro study. Katsoulis J; Mericske-Stern R; Rotkina L; Zbären C; Enkling N; Blatz MB Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):165-74. PubMed ID: 23025489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Passivity of conventional and CAD/CAM fabricated implant frameworks. de Araújo GM; de França DG; Silva Neto JP; Barbosa GA Braz Dent J; 2015; 26(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 26200153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro precision of fit of computer-aided designed and computer-aided manufactured titanium screw-retained fixed dental prostheses before and after ceramic veneering. Katsoulis J; Mericske-Stern R; Enkling N; Katsoulis K; Blatz MB Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 24289301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of manufacturing techniques on the marginal and internal fit of cobalt-chromium implant-supported multiunit frameworks. Akçin ET; Güncü MB; Aktaş G; Aslan Y J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):715-720. PubMed ID: 30017153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An in vitro study using confocal laser scanning microscopy to evaluate the marginal misfits of different implant-supported frameworks. Tonin BSH; Fu J; Peixoto RF; Fischer NG; Fernandes RM; Curylofo PA; de Mattos MDGC; Macedo AP; de Almeida RP J Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38305664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of Vertical Misfit of CAD/CAM Implant-Supported Titanium and Zirconia Frameworks. da Cunha Fontoura D; de Magalhães Barros V; de Magalhães CS; Vaz RR; Moreira AN Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):1027-1032. PubMed ID: 30231088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Marginal fit and photoelastic stress analysis of CAD-CAM and overcast 3-unit implant-supported frameworks. Presotto AG; Bhering CL; Mesquita MF; Barão VA J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):373-379. PubMed ID: 27666497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation and comparison of vertical marginal fit of three different types of multiunit screw-retained framework fabricated for an implant-supported prosthesis - An Singh M; Yadav BK; Phukela SS; Ritwal P; Nagpal A; Saluja P J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2022; 22(3):240-248. PubMed ID: 36511053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Misfit simulation on implant prostheses with different combinations of engaging and nonengaging titanium bases. Part 1: Stereomicroscopic assessment of the active and passive fit. Rutkunas V; Dirse J; Kules D; Simonaitis T J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Apr; 129(4):589-596. PubMed ID: 35527068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]