152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2770630)
1. Maximum likelihood analysis of free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) data.
Chakraborty DP
Med Phys; 1989; 16(4):561-8. PubMed ID: 2770630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Free-response methodology: alternate analysis and a new observer-performance experiment.
Chakraborty DP; Winter LH
Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):873-81. PubMed ID: 2305073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Performance assessment of mammographic diagnostic systems: evolution of methods and their application to a digital image study].
Compagnone G; Ferruzzi K; Pierotti L; Vianello Vos C; Berardi P; Bergamini C
Radiol Med; 1999 Mar; 97(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 10363062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nonparametric signal detectability evaluation using an exponential transformation of the FROC curve.
Popescu LM
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5690-702. PubMed ID: 21992384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Maximum likelihood fitting of FROC curves under an initial-detection-and-candidate-analysis model.
Edwards DC; Kupinski MA; Metz CE; Nishikawa RM
Med Phys; 2002 Dec; 29(12):2861-70. PubMed ID: 12512721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perceptually based FROC analysis.
Arora R; Kundel HL; Beam CA
Acad Radiol; 2005 Dec; 12(12):1567-74. PubMed ID: 16321746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ideal AFROC and FROC observers.
Khurd P; Liu B; Gindi G
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Feb; 29(2):375-86. PubMed ID: 20129845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. On the meaning of the weighted alternative free-response operating characteristic figure of merit.
Chakraborty DP; Zhai X
Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2548. PubMed ID: 27147365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Recent advances in observer performance methodology: jackknife free-response ROC (JAFROC).
Chakraborty DP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):26-31. PubMed ID: 15933077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spatial localization accuracy of radiologists in free-response studies: Inferring perceptual FROC curves from mark-rating data.
Chakraborty D; Yoon HJ; Mello-Thoms C
Acad Radiol; 2007 Jan; 14(1):4-18. PubMed ID: 17178361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Observer studies involving detection and localization: modeling, analysis, and validation.
Chakraborty DP; Berbaum KS
Med Phys; 2004 Aug; 31(8):2313-30. PubMed ID: 15377098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlation of free-response and receiver-operating-characteristic area-under-the-curve estimates: results from independently conducted FROC∕ROC studies in mammography.
Zanca F; Hillis SL; Claus F; Van Ongeval C; Celis V; Provoost V; Yoon HJ; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):5917-29. PubMed ID: 23039631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Localized detection and classification of abnormalities on FFDM and tomosynthesis examinations rated under an FROC paradigm.
Gur D; Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Zuley ML; Sumkin JH; Chough DM; Hakim CM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Mar; 196(3):737-41. PubMed ID: 21343521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Unified measurement of observer performance in detecting and localizing target objects on images.
Swensson RG
Med Phys; 1996 Oct; 23(10):1709-25. PubMed ID: 8946368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy in free-response detection-localization tasks using ROC tools.
Bandos AI; Obuchowski NA
Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jun; 28(6):1808-1825. PubMed ID: 29921163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A constrained formulation for the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve based on probability summation.
Swensson RG; King JL; Gur D
Med Phys; 2001 Aug; 28(8):1597-609. PubMed ID: 11548929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Utility as a rationale for choosing observer performance assessment paradigms for detection tasks in medical imaging.
Wunderlich A; Abbey CK
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111903. PubMed ID: 24320436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Operating characteristics predicted by models for diagnostic tasks involving lesion localization.
Chakraborty DP; Yoon HJ
Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):435-45. PubMed ID: 18383663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of masses in digital breast tomosynthesis using complementary information of simulated projection.
Kim ST; Kim DH; Ro YM
Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):7043-58. PubMed ID: 26632059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Metric for Reducing False Positives in the Computer-Aided Detection of Breast Cancer from Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Based Screening Examinations of High-Risk Women.
Levman JE; Gallego-Ortiz C; Warner E; Causer P; Martel AL
J Digit Imaging; 2016 Feb; 29(1):126-33. PubMed ID: 26293705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
