115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 277070)
1. Landmark identification accuracy in xeroradiographic cephalometry.
Hurst RV; Schwaninger B; Shaye R; Chadha JM
Am J Orthod; 1978 May; 73(5):568-74. PubMed ID: 277070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interobserver reliability in xeroradiographic cephalometry.
Hurst RV; Schwaninger B; Shaye R
Am J Orthod; 1979 Feb; 75(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 283703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A cephalometric appraisal of xeroradiography.
Chate RA
Am J Orthod; 1980 May; 77(5):547-67. PubMed ID: 6929162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the reliability of craniofacial anatomic landmarks based on cephalometric radiographs and three-dimensional CT scans.
Kragskov J; Bosch C; Gyldensted C; Sindet-Pedersen S
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Mar; 34(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 9138504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Landmark identification errors on cone-beam computed tomography-derived cephalograms and conventional digital cephalograms.
Chang ZC; Hu FC; Lai E; Yao CC; Chen MH; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Dec; 140(6):e289-97. PubMed ID: 22133963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of image enhancement on reliability of landmark identification in digital cephalometry.
Oshagh M; Shahidi SH; Danaei SH
Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 23852241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Variance of landmarks in digital evaluations: comparison between CT-based and conventional digital lateral cephalometric radiographs.
Greiner M; Greiner A; Hirschfelder U
J Orofac Orthop; 2007 Jul; 68(4):290-8. PubMed ID: 17639277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative study of cephalometric measurements using 3 imaging modalities.
Wen J; Liu S; Ye X; Xie X; Li J; Li H; Mei L
J Am Dent Assoc; 2017 Dec; 148(12):913-921. PubMed ID: 29042006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of changing the head position on accuracy of transverse measurements of the maxillofacial region made on cone beam computed tomography and conventional posterior-anterior cephalograms.
Shokri A; Miresmaeili A; Farhadian N; Falah-Kooshki S; Amini P; Mollaie N
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Jul; 46(5):20160180. PubMed ID: 28306330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patient radiation dose in conventional and xerographic cephalography.
Copley RL; Glaze SA; Bushong SC; West DC
Am J Orthod; 1979 Nov; 76(5):505-10. PubMed ID: 292313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of computerized automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks.
Liu JK; Chen YT; Cheng KS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Nov; 118(5):535-40. PubMed ID: 11094367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms.
Kumar V; Ludlow JB; Mol A; Cevidanes L
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jul; 36(5):263-9. PubMed ID: 17586852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Profile enhancement and cephalometric landmark identification.
Burger HJ; Rossouw PE; Stander I
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Mar; 105(3):250-6. PubMed ID: 8135208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Point A revisited.
Jacobson RL; Jacobson A
Am J Orthod; 1980 Jan; 77(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 6928088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validity of cephalometric landmarks. An experimental study on human skulls.
Tng TT; Chan TC; Hägg U; Cooke MS
Eur J Orthod; 1994 Apr; 16(2):110-20. PubMed ID: 8005198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A method of magnification correction for posteroanterior radiographic cephalometry.
Hsiao TH; Chang HP; Liu KM
Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 9107378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks: an experimental study on skulls.
Hägg U; Cooke MS; Chan TC; Tng TT; Lau PY
Aust Orthod J; 1998 Oct; 15(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 10204427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of differences in landmark identification on the cephalometric measurements in traditional versus digitized cephalometry.
Chen YJ; Chen SK; Yao JC; Chang HF
Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 15132440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Linear mandibular measurements: comparison between orthopantomograms and lateral cephalograms.
Ongkosuwito EM; Dieleman MM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Mulder PG; van Neck JW
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2009 Mar; 46(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 19254052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
