These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27707432)
1. Redefining homonyms under Rule 51b (4) of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Tindall BJ Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2016 Dec; 66(12):5618-5619. PubMed ID: 27707432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An analysis of the term 'standing in nomenclature', as used in the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Tindall BJ Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2019 Jul; 69(7):2166-2168. PubMed ID: 30575500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of Greek in the prokaryotic nomenclature: proposal to change Principle 3, Recommendation 6, Rule 7, Rule 65 and Appendix 9 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Oren A; Schink B Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2020 May; 70(5):3559-3560. PubMed ID: 32375977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Public discussion on a proposed revision of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Oren A; Arahal DR; Rosselló-Móra R; Sutcliffe IC; Moore ERB Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2021 Jun; 71(6):. PubMed ID: 34191704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Proposal to modify the Rules of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes to abolish the taxonomic categories Subfamily, Subtribe and Kingdom. Oren A Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2019 May; 69(5):1524-1525. PubMed ID: 30806612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Emendation of Rules 5b, 8, 15 and 22 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes to include the rank of phylum. Oren A; Arahal DR; Rosselló-Móra R; Sutcliffe IC; Moore ERB Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2021 Jun; 71(6):. PubMed ID: 34161220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Further guidelines for the formation of compound specific and subspecific epithets. A proposal to emend Appendix 9 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Oren A; Schink B Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2020 May; 70(5):3561-3562. PubMed ID: 32392120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Naming classes of prokaryotes based on the rules of Latin grammar. Oren A; Chuvochina M; Schink B; Ventura S Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2019 May; 69(5):1526-1527. PubMed ID: 30801240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Proposal to add a Note to Rule 8 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes to clarify the meaning of the term 'stem'. Oren A; Kostovski M; Pallen MJ Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2024 Sep; 74(9):. PubMed ID: 39283668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On names of genera of prokaryotes that are later homonyms of generic names with standing in the zoological or the botanical nomenclature. Proposal of Neomegalonema gen. nov. and Neomegalonema perideroedes comb. nov. as replacements for the prokaryotic generic name Meganema and the species name Meganema perideroedes. Oren A Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2017 Oct; 67(10):4276-4278. PubMed ID: 28933323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Proposed modifications to Rule 40d of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Tindall BJ Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2019 May; 69(5):1519-1520. PubMed ID: 30777819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The name Bradyrhizobiaceae Garrity et al. 2006 contains Nitrobacter Winogradsky 1892 (Approved Lists 1980), the nomenclatural type of the family Nitrobacteraceae Buchanan 1917 (Approved Lists 1980), is illegitimate and proposals to alter the wording of Rule 54 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes to clarify the fact that the family name Bradyrhizobiaceae Garrity et al. 2006 is replaced by the family name Nitrobacteraceae Buchanan 1917 (Approved Lists 1980) the only correct name. Tindall BJ Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2019 Aug; 69(8):2609-2611. PubMed ID: 30775963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of Greek and Latin prepositions and prefixes in compound names: proposed emendation of Appendix 9 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Oren A; Chuvochina M; Schink B Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2019 Jun; 69(6):1831-1832. PubMed ID: 30950785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Emendation of circumscriptions of taxa in the Lists of Changes in Taxonomic Opinion. Oren A; Garrity GM Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2020 Apr; 70(4):2163-2164. PubMed ID: 32213248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Proposal to modify Rule 10a and to delete Recommendation 10a(3) from the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Oren A Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2017 Sep; 67(9):3683-3684. PubMed ID: 28840810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are Rules 20d and 20e of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes superfluous? Tindall BJ Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2016 Nov; 66(11):4907-4909. PubMed ID: 27528235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Standardised Suffixes in the Nomenclature of the Higher Taxa of Prokaryotes an Aid to Data Mining, Database Administration and Automatic Assignment of Names to Taxonomic Ranks. Tindall BJ Curr Microbiol; 2020 Jun; 77(6):1135-1138. PubMed ID: 32006104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Proposal to change General Consideration 5 and Principle 2 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Oren A; Garrity GM Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2014 Jan; 64(Pt 1):309-310. PubMed ID: 24408952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The wording and examples given in Rule 47a of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes are misleading. Tindall BJ Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2016 Nov; 66(11):4913-4914. PubMed ID: 27553429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Notes on the characterization of prokaryote strains for taxonomic purposes. Tindall BJ; Rosselló-Móra R; Busse HJ; Ludwig W; Kämpfer P Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2010 Jan; 60(Pt 1):249-266. PubMed ID: 19700448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]