These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2770864)

  • 1. Peer review (continued).
    Nature; 1989 Aug; 340(6235):588. PubMed ID: 2770864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peer review in medical publishing--how to streamline the system.
    Kochar MS
    Am Coll Physicians Obs; 1984 Oct; 4(9):6. PubMed ID: 10269285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An experiment in progress.
    Nat Med; 2010 Sep; 16(9):935. PubMed ID: 20823851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is anonymous peer review the best way to review and accept manuscripts?
    Altura BT
    Magnes Trace Elem; 1990; 9(3):117-8. PubMed ID: 2248691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Connections between open access publishing and access to gray literature.
    Banks M
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2004 Apr; 92(2):164-6. PubMed ID: 15088074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Peer review in health sciences.
    Das T
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2002 Jun; 50(2):79. PubMed ID: 12194582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peer review.
    Rosenfeld RM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Aug; 137(2):179-81. PubMed ID: 17666237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peer review and the fate of manuscripts.
    Frey JJ
    Fam Med; 1985; 17(1):3. PubMed ID: 3843084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer review: universal, but valid?
    Sataloff RT
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2009 Apr; 88(4):848-51. PubMed ID: 19358120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer review system in health sciences.
    Thomas R; Parikh R
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2003 Mar; 51(1):109-10; author reply 110. PubMed ID: 12701880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Veterinary pathology and peer review.
    Cantor GH; Caswell JL; Crissman JW; Gillette DM; Gunson DE; Hogenesch H; Kiupel M; Mense MG; Miller MA; Rush LJ; Leger JA; Schoeb TR; Sellers RS; Sills RC; Swayne DE; Thomas HC; Ward JM; Alden CL
    Vet Pathol; 2009 Mar; 46(2):173-5. PubMed ID: 19261628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How does peer review work?
    Aaron L
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Shared responsibility in expert review of original articles].
    Shashok K
    Rev Neurol; 1997 Dec; 25(148):1946-50. PubMed ID: 9528039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. US agencies urged to tighten up peer review.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 1993 Aug; 364(6437):470. PubMed ID: 8336780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A perspective on scientific peer review for informing regulatory decisions: making sure peer review makes a difference.
    Greenbaum D
    Risk Anal; 2006 Feb; 26(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 16492174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peer review.
    Blaivas JG
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2004; 23(7):617. PubMed ID: 15382180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peering into the review process.
    Nat Struct Biol; 2000 Dec; 7(12):1075-6. PubMed ID: 11101879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Thoughts of a manuscript reviewer.
    Bluestone N
    Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1996; 59(3):14-8. PubMed ID: 9074317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Disclosure and disinterest.
    Kennedy D
    Science; 2004 Jan; 303(5654):15. PubMed ID: 14704397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Harefuah peer review].
    Shemer Y; Shoenfeld Y
    Harefuah; 2001 May; 140(5):403-5. PubMed ID: 11419062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.