BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2770882)

  • 1. Genetic engineering. Dispute over monitoring.
    Webb B
    Nature; 1989 Sep; 341(6237):7. PubMed ID: 2770882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Britain's genetic manipulation regulations to be extended.
    Newmark P
    Nature; 1987 Oct 1-7; 329(6138):379. PubMed ID: 3477700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Britain regulates organism release.
    Webb B
    Nature; 1989 Oct; 341(6244):681. PubMed ID: 2797198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Still looser UK guidelines.
    Nature; 1980 Sep; 287(5780):265-6. PubMed ID: 6932590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. UK revamps genetic engineering panel to focus on policy.
    Nature; 1996 Sep; 383(6596):114. PubMed ID: 11644801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetic engineering. Safety concerns halt U.K. study.
    Kingman S
    Science; 1994 Feb; 263(5148):748. PubMed ID: 8303287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A shepherd for transgenic animals.
    Connor S
    New Sci; 1989 Jan; 121(1648):25. PubMed ID: 11655927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Big changes at the RAC!
    Anderson WF
    Hum Gene Ther; 1994 Nov; 5(11):1309-10. PubMed ID: 7893801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Regulation of recombinant DNA research: a comparative study.
    Teichmann DL
    Loyola Los Angel Int Comp Law J; 1983; 6(1):1-35. PubMed ID: 15739273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Regulating genetic manipulation.
    Bull Med Ethics; 1990 May; No. 58():13-4. PubMed ID: 11651983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetic manipulation advisory group (GMAG) and the environment for genetic engineering in Britain.
    Williamson R
    Biochem Soc Symp; 1979; 44():119-21. PubMed ID: 291433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. RAC's review of gene therapy: it's time to move on.
    Post LE
    Hum Gene Ther; 1994 Nov; 5(11):1311-2; discussion 1313-4. PubMed ID: 7893802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MPs challenge rejection of genetics panel.
    Dickson D
    Nature; 1996 Jan; 379(6562):195. PubMed ID: 8538778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. UK genetic engineering regulations relax gradually.
    Redfearn J
    Nature; 1979 Dec 20-27; 282(5741):769. PubMed ID: 514360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. MPs call for tough controls on human genetics.
    Genethics News; 1995; No. 7():1, 3. PubMed ID: 11655124
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. UK rules out new gene therapy laws.
    Hodgson J
    Nature; 1993 Nov; 366(6452):194. PubMed ID: 8232572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gene manipulation in Britain.
    Ager BP
    Nature; 1987 Jan 15-21; 325(6101):190. PubMed ID: 3808013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. From Asilomar to industrial biotechnology: risks, reductionism and regulation.
    Krimsky S
    Sci Cult (Lond); 2005 Dec; 14(4):309-23. PubMed ID: 16619467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genetic engineering. Controls needed on release.
    Newmark P
    Nature; 1989 Jul; 340(6229):84. PubMed ID: 2739744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Keeping the gene genie in the bottle.
    Yanchinski S
    New Sci; 1983 Apr; 98(1353):69-71. PubMed ID: 11655531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.