These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2771007)

  • 1. The effect of the thermoplastic Minerva body jacket on cervical spine motion.
    Maiman D; Millington P; Novak S; Kerk J; Ellingsen J; Wenninger W
    Neurosurgery; 1989 Sep; 25(3):363-7; discussion 367-8. PubMed ID: 2771007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Thermoplastic Minerva body jacket--a practical alternative to current methods of cervical spine stabilization. A clinical report.
    Millington PJ; Ellingsen JM; Hauswirth BE; Fabian PJ
    Phys Ther; 1987 Feb; 67(2):223-5. PubMed ID: 3809248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of the Minerva and halo jackets for stabilization of the cervical spine.
    Benzel EC; Hadden TA; Saulsbery CM
    J Neurosurg; 1989 Mar; 70(3):411-4. PubMed ID: 2915248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The thermoplastic Minerva body jacket: a clinical comparison with other cervical spine splinting techniques.
    Benzel EC; Larson SJ; Kerk JJ; Millington PJ; Novak SM; Falkner RH; Wenninger WJ
    J Spinal Disord; 1992 Sep; 5(3):311-9. PubMed ID: 1520990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the Minerva cervicothoracic orthosis.
    Sharpe KP; Rao S; Ziogas A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Jul; 20(13):1475-9. PubMed ID: 8623066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
    Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
    Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do cervical collars and cervicothoracic orthoses effectively stabilize the injured cervical spine? A biomechanical investigation.
    Ivancic PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):E767-74. PubMed ID: 23486409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical evaluation of occipitocervicothoracic fusion: impact of partial or sequential fixation.
    Cheng BC; Hafez MA; Cunningham B; Serhan H; Welch WC
    Spine J; 2008; 8(5):821-6. PubMed ID: 17981098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dimensional changes of the neuroforamina in subaxial cervical spine during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension.
    Mao H; Driscoll SJ; Li JS; Li G; Wood KB; Cha TD
    Spine J; 2016 Apr; 16(4):540-6. PubMed ID: 26681352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The stabilizing effects of different orthoses in the intact and unstable upper cervical spine: a cadaver study.
    Richter D; Latta LL; Milne EL; Varkarakis GM; Biedermann L; Ekkernkamp A; Ostermann PA
    J Trauma; 2001 May; 50(5):848-54. PubMed ID: 11371840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The ability of external immobilizers to restrict movement of the cervical spine: a systematic review.
    Holla M; Huisman JM; Verdonschot N; Goosen J; Hosman AJ; Hannink G
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Jul; 25(7):2023-36. PubMed ID: 27032640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Custom fitted thermoplastic Minerva jackets in the treatment of cervical spine instability in preschool age children.
    Gaskill SJ; Marlin AE
    Pediatr Neurosurg; 1990-1991; 16(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 2133409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional intervertebral kinematics in the healthy young adult cervical spine during dynamic functional loading.
    Anderst WJ; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Kang JD
    J Biomech; 2015 May; 48(7):1286-93. PubMed ID: 25814180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Emergency cervical-spine immobilization.
    Chandler DR; Nemejc C; Adkins RH; Waters RL
    Ann Emerg Med; 1992 Oct; 21(10):1185-8. PubMed ID: 1416294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Application of a stand-alone interbody fusion cage based on a novel porous TiO2/glass ceramic--2: Biomechanical evaluation after implantation in the sheep cervical spine].
    Korinth MC; Hero T; Pandorf T; Zell D
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2005 Apr; 50(4):111-8. PubMed ID: 15884708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vivo analysis of cervical range of motion after 4- and 5-level subaxial cervical spine fusion.
    Bechara BP; Bell KM; Hartman RA; Lee JY; Kang JD; Donaldson WF
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jan; 37(1):E23-9. PubMed ID: 21508893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of two-level total disc replacement on cervical spine kinematics.
    Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Dooris A; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):E794-9. PubMed ID: 19829242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Three-dimensional finite-element study on anterior transpedicular screw fixation system of the subaxial cervical spine].
    Li J; Zhao L; Qi F; Ma W; Xu R; Jiang W; Liu W; Zhang M; Hong J; Yu L
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Nov; 53(11):841-6. PubMed ID: 26813839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Study of low-temperature thermoplastic modified custom-molded cervical orthosis for cervical spine fixation.
    Lau YC; Chang RK; Cheng YC; Chang GL; Chou YL; Leong CP; Wong MK
    J Spinal Disord; 1994 Dec; 7(6):504-9. PubMed ID: 7873848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disc replacement adjacent to cervical fusion: a biomechanical comparison of hybrid construct versus two-level fusion.
    Lee MJ; Dumonski M; Phillips FM; Voronov LI; Renner SM; Carandang G; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Nov; 36(23):1932-9. PubMed ID: 21289581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.