These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27712116)

  • 1. Estimation of the Coefficient of Variation with Minimum Risk: A Sequential Method for Minimizing Sampling Error and Study Cost.
    Chattopadhyay B; Kelley K
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(5):627-648. PubMed ID: 27712116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating the standardized mean difference with minimum risk: Maximizing accuracy and minimizing cost with sequential estimation.
    Chattopadhyay B; Kelley K
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Mar; 22(1):94-113. PubMed ID: 27607545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sequential accuracy in parameter estimation for population correlation coefficients.
    Kelley K; Bilson Darku F; Chattopadhyay B
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Aug; 24(4):492-515. PubMed ID: 30829512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy in parameter estimation for ANCOVA and ANOVA contrasts: sample size planning via narrow confidence intervals.
    Lai K; Kelley K
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 May; 65(2):350-70. PubMed ID: 22004142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy in parameter estimation for a general class of effect sizes: A sequential approach.
    Kelley K; Darku FB; Chattopadhyay B
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Jun; 23(2):226-243. PubMed ID: 28383948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy in parameter estimation for targeted effects in structural equation modeling: sample size planning for narrow confidence intervals.
    Lai K; Kelley K
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Jun; 16(2):127-48. PubMed ID: 21417531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simplified procedure for efficient and unbiased population size estimation.
    Cruz M; González-Villa J
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0206091. PubMed ID: 30372479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of inferential procedures for adaptive clinical trial designs with pre-specified rules for modifying the sample size.
    Levin GP; Emerson SC; Emerson SS
    Biometrics; 2014 Sep; 70(3):556-67. PubMed ID: 24766094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Information-based sample size re-estimation in group sequential design for longitudinal trials.
    Zhou J; Adewale A; Shentu Y; Liu J; Anderson K
    Stat Med; 2014 Sep; 33(22):3801-14. PubMed ID: 24797715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consequences of sequential sampling for meta-analysis.
    Braschi L; Botella J; Suero M
    Behav Res Methods; 2014 Dec; 46(4):1167-83. PubMed ID: 24399083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A practical comparison of group-sequential and adaptive designs.
    Kelly PJ; Sooriyarachchi MR; Stallard N; Todd S
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(4):719-38. PubMed ID: 16022175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sample size estimation for pilot animal experiments by using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo approach.
    Allgoewer A; Mayer B
    Altern Lab Anim; 2017 May; 45(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 28598193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sample size planning with the cost constraint for testing superiority and equivalence of two independent groups.
    Guo JH; Chen HJ; Luh WM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):439-61. PubMed ID: 20704777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sample size planning for composite reliability coefficients: accuracy in parameter estimation via narrow confidence intervals.
    Terry L; Kelley K
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Nov; 65(3):371-401. PubMed ID: 22010985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analytic variance estimates of Swank and Fano factors.
    Gutierrez B; Badano A; Samuelson F
    Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):072102. PubMed ID: 24989397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving the efficiency of estimation in randomized trials of adaptive treatment strategies.
    Lavori PW; Dawson R
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(4):297-308. PubMed ID: 17848491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of analysis-of-variance-based methods to quantify the random variations of observers in medical imaging measurements: guidelines to the investigator.
    Zeggelink WF; Hart AA; Gilhuijs KG
    Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):1996-2007. PubMed ID: 15305452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Practical approach to determine sample size for building logistic prediction models using high-throughput data.
    Son DS; Lee D; Lee K; Jung SH; Ahn T; Lee E; Sohn I; Chung J; Park W; Huh N; Lee JW
    J Biomed Inform; 2015 Feb; 53():355-62. PubMed ID: 25555898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bias and precision of some classical ANOVA effect sizes when assumptions are violated.
    Troncoso Skidmore S; Thompson B
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Jun; 45(2):536-46. PubMed ID: 23055163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Covariate-adjusted confidence interval for the intraclass correlation coefficient.
    Shoukri MM; Donner A; El-Dali A
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2013 Sep; 36(1):244-53. PubMed ID: 23871746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.