558 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27712464)
1. In Vitro Biofilm Formation on Titanium and Zirconia Implant Surfaces.
Roehling S; Astasov-Frauenhoffer M; Hauser-Gerspach I; Braissant O; Woelfler H; Waltimo T; Kniha H; Gahlert M
J Periodontol; 2017 Mar; 88(3):298-307. PubMed ID: 27712464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ligature-Induced Peri-implant Bone Loss Around Loaded Zirconia and Titanium Implants.
Roehling S; Gahlert M; Janner S; Meng B; Woelfler H; Cochran DL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(2):357–365. PubMed ID: 30716147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Structural and quantitative analysis of a mature anaerobic biofilm on different implant abutment surfaces.
de Avila ED; Avila-Campos MJ; Vergani CE; Spolidório DM; Mollo Fde A
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Apr; 115(4):428-36. PubMed ID: 26597465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of titanium and zirconia dental implant abutments on a cultivable polymicrobial saliva community.
de Avila ED; Vergani CE; Mollo Junior FA; Junior MJ; Shi W; Lux R
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Oct; 118(4):481-487. PubMed ID: 28343672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of oral microbial corrosion on the surface degradation of dental implant materials.
Siddiqui DA; Guida L; Sridhar S; Valderrama P; Wilson TG; Rodrigues DC
J Periodontol; 2019 Jan; 90(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 30102765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Early and mature biofilm on four different dental implant materials: An in vivo human study.
Herrmann H; Kern JS; Kern T; Lautensack J; Conrads G; Wolfart S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Nov; 31(11):1094-1104. PubMed ID: 32871610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Essential oils and zirconia dental implant materials.
Al-Radha AS; Younes C; Diab BS; Jenkinson HF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(6):1497-505. PubMed ID: 24278917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of different titanium zirconium implant surfaces on initial supragingival plaque formation.
John G; Becker J; Schwarz F
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Jul; 28(7):e84-e90. PubMed ID: 27206534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modified implant surface with slower and less initial biofilm formation.
John G; Becker J; Schwarz F
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 17(3):461-8. PubMed ID: 23981274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Piranha-etched titanium nanostructure reduces biofilm formation in vitro.
Mukaddam K; Astasov-Frauenhoffer M; Fasler-Kan E; Ruggiero S; Alhawasli F; Kisiel M; Meyer E; Köser J; Bornstein MM; Wagner RS; Kühl S
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Oct; 27(10):6187-6197. PubMed ID: 37653076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of the aging of titanium and zirconia abutment surfaces on the viability, adhesion, and proliferation of cells and the adhesion of microorganisms.
Rigolin MSM; Barbugli PA; Jorge JH; Reis MRD; Adabo GL; Casemiro LA; Martins CHG; de Lima OJ; Mollo Junior FA
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Dec; 122(6):564.e1-564.e10. PubMed ID: 31791536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Initial oral biofilm formation on titanium implants with different surface treatments: An in vivo study.
Ferreira Ribeiro C; Cogo-Müller K; Franco GC; Silva-Concílio LR; Sampaio Campos M; de Mello Rode S; Claro Neves AC
Arch Oral Biol; 2016 Sep; 69():33-9. PubMed ID: 27232358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vivo performance of zirconia and titanium implants: a histomorphometric study in mini pig maxillae.
Gahlert M; Roehling S; Sprecher CM; Kniha H; Milz S; Bormann K
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Mar; 23(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 21806681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Response to antiseptic agents of periodontal pathogens in in vitro biofilms on titanium and zirconium surfaces.
Sánchez MC; Fernández E; Llama-Palacios A; Figuero E; Herrera D; Sanz M
Dent Mater; 2017 Apr; 33(4):446-453. PubMed ID: 28237092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biofilm on dental implants: a review of the literature.
Subramani K; Jung RE; Molenberg A; Hammerle CH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):616-26. PubMed ID: 19885401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intranuclear cell uptake and toxicity of titanium dioxide and zirconia particles as well as bacterial adhesion on dental titanium- and zirconia-implants.
Dhein J; Haller C; Reichl FX; Milz S; Hickel R; Kollmuss M; Högg C
Dent Mater; 2022 Mar; 38(3):517-528. PubMed ID: 34991888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of Bioactivation on Traditional Surfaces and Zirconium Nitride: Adhesion and Proliferation of Preosteoblastic Cells and Bacteria.
Pistilli R; Genova T; Canullo L; Faga MG; Terlizzi ME; Gribaudo G; Mussano F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1247-1254. PubMed ID: 30427955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Osteoblast integration of dental implant materials after challenge by sub-gingival pathogens: a co-culture study in vitro.
Zhao B; van der Mei HC; Rustema-Abbing M; Busscher HJ; Ren Y
Int J Oral Sci; 2015 Dec; 7(4):250-8. PubMed ID: 26674427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical evaluation of a microstructured zirconia implant by a removal torque comparison with a standard Ti-SLA implant.
Bormann KH; Gellrich NC; Kniha H; Dard M; Wieland M; Gahlert M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1210-6. PubMed ID: 22092587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
