71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27713052)
1. Accuracy of virtually 3D planned resection templates in mandibular reconstruction.
Weijs WL; Coppen C; Schreurs R; Vreeken RD; Verhulst AC; Merkx MA; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Nov; 44(11):1828-1832. PubMed ID: 27713052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In-house virtual surgical planning and guided mandibular reconstruction is less precise, but more economical and time-efficient than commercial procedures.
Block OM; Khromov T; Hoene G; Schliephake H; Brockmeyer P
Head Neck; 2024 Apr; 46(4):871-883. PubMed ID: 38205891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of computer-assisted surgery in mandibular reconstruction: A systematic review.
van Baar GJC; Forouzanfar T; Liberton NPTJ; Winters HAH; Leusink FKJ
Oral Oncol; 2018 Sep; 84():52-60. PubMed ID: 30115476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A 3D Analysis of Plating Strategies in Mandibular Reconstruction: A Randomized Control Pilot Study.
Chen T; Chan HHL; de Almeida J; Goldstein DP; Gilbert RW; Yao CMKL; Irish JC; Davies JC
Laryngoscope; 2024 May; 134(5):2182-2186. PubMed ID: 37962081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Streamlining complex mandibular fracture treatment: Integration of virtual surgical planning and short-segment drilling guides.
Zhuang H; Zhu B; Zhu L; You Y; Zhang J; Bu S
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2024 Apr; 52(4):397-405. PubMed ID: 38458893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating the benefit of virtual surgical planning on bony union rates in head and neck reconstructive surgery.
Sabiq F; Cherukupalli A; Khalil M; Tran LK; Kwon JJY; Milner T; Durham JS; Prisman E
Head Neck; 2024 Jun; 46(6):1322-1330. PubMed ID: 38545772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surgical Margins After Computer-Assisted Mandibular Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study.
Crosetti E; Succo G; Battiston B; D'Addabbo F; Tascone M; Maldi E; Bertotto I; Berrone M
Front Oral Health; 2021; 2():806477. PubMed ID: 35098211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Prevalence of free flap failure in mandibular osteoradionecrosis reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kostares E; Kostares M; Kostare G; Tsakris A; Kantzanou M
Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):11087. PubMed ID: 38750124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surgical benefit of mandibular morphometric analysis: A new tool to standardize mandibular reconstruction.
Prevost A; Delanoe F; Cavallier Z; Muller S; Lopez R; Lauwers F
PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0240558. PubMed ID: 33156821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Deep Circumflex Iliac Artery Flap Reconstruction in Brown Class I Defect of the Mandible Using a Three-Component Surgical Template System.
Zheng C; Xu X; Jiang T; Zhang X; Yin X; Yang R; Zhang Z; Hu Y
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 Jan; 153(1):203-214. PubMed ID: 37053456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of jaw opening function after mandibular reconstruction using subject-specific musculoskeletal modelling.
Chen J; Wang J; Guo J; Wang X; Kang Y; Wang Y; Guo C
J Oral Rehabil; 2024 Jun; 51(6):1050-1060. PubMed ID: 38544336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term stability of jaw reconstruction with microvascular bone flaps: A prospective longitudinal study.
Pu JJ; Choi WS; Wong MCM; Wu S; Leung PH; Yang WF; Su YX
Oral Oncol; 2024 May; 152():106780. PubMed ID: 38555752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A novel simulation module for segmental mandibulectomy and mandible reconstruction using 3D models.
Agarwal A; Schlegel L; Fiorella M; Goldfarb JM; Vimawala S; Gadaleta DJ; Pugliese RS; Ku B; Kearney J; Curry JM; Goldman RA
Am J Otolaryngol; 2023; 44(6):103963. PubMed ID: 37406412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cutting guides in mandibular tumor ablation: Are we as accurate as we think?
Suhaym O; Moles L; Callahan N
Saudi Dent J; 2024 Feb; 36(2):340-346. PubMed ID: 38420006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Testing of Different Scanning Protocols Used for Precise 3D-printing of Mandibular Models.
Micic M; Jadzic J; Milenkovic P; Antic S; Antonijevic D; Djuric M
J Craniofac Surg; 2023 Oct; 34(7):e623-e626. PubMed ID: 37226292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automated calculation of ontology-based planning proposals: An application in reconstructive oral and maxillofacial surgery.
Hagen N; Weichel F; Kühle R; Knaup P; Freudlsperger C; Eisenmann U
Int J Med Robot; 2023 Dec; 19(6):e2545. PubMed ID: 37395309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The utility of cone-beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography scan for the evaluation of invasion versus erosion by mandibular squamous cell carcinoma as viewed on medical PACS.
Neal TW; Wahidi J; Williams FC; Schlieve T; Donepudi J; Kim RY
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent); 2024; 37(3):396-400. PubMed ID: 38628331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new concept for mandible reconstruction after oncological resection: Multisegment virtual surgical planning.
Ismayilzade M; Yildiz K; Canter HI
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Mar; ():101859. PubMed ID: 38565422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Postoperative facial appearance of patients with extensive oral squamous cell carcinoma can be adequately preserved with in‑house virtually planned mandibular reconstruction.
Hoene G; Moser N; Schminke B; Wiechens B; Leha A; Khromov T; Schliephake H; Brockmeyer P
Mol Clin Oncol; 2023 Dec; 19(6):97. PubMed ID: 37953859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anatomic evaluation of Pancoast tumors using three-dimensional models for surgical strategy development.
Chen Z; Bernards N; Gregor A; Vannelli C; Kitazawa S; de Perrot M; Yasufuku K
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2023 Mar; 165(3):842-852.e5. PubMed ID: 36241449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
