These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27713723)

  • 1. A Tutorial on Hunting Statistical Significance by Chasing
    Szucs D
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1444. PubMed ID: 27713723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The earth is flat (
    Amrhein V; Korner-Nievergelt F; Roth T
    PeerJ; 2017; 5():e3544. PubMed ID: 28698825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Is Unsuitable for Research: A Reassessment.
    Szucs D; Ioannidis JPA
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2017; 11():390. PubMed ID: 28824397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of redefining statistical significance on P-hacking and false positive rates: An agent-based model.
    Fitzpatrick BG; Gorman DM; Trombatore C
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0303262. PubMed ID: 38753677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Publication bias and the canonization of false facts.
    Nissen SB; Magidson T; Gross K; Bergstrom CT
    Elife; 2016 Dec; 5():. PubMed ID: 27995896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Theoretical false positive psychology.
    Wilson BM; Harris CR; Wixted JT
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Oct; 29(5):1751-1775. PubMed ID: 35501547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are most published research findings false? Trends in statistical power, publication selection bias, and the false discovery rate in psychology (1975-2017).
    Schneck A
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0292717. PubMed ID: 37847689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. HARKing, Cherry-Picking, P-Hacking, Fishing Expeditions, and Data Dredging and Mining as Questionable Research Practices.
    Andrade C
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2021 Feb; 82(1):. PubMed ID: 33999541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fisher, Neyman-Pearson or NHST? A tutorial for teaching data testing.
    Perezgonzalez JD
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():223. PubMed ID: 25784889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Beyond p-values in the evaluation of brain-computer interfaces: A Bayesian estimation approach.
    Melinscak F; Montesano L
    J Neurosci Methods; 2016 Sep; 270():30-45. PubMed ID: 27317498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detecting and avoiding likely false-positive findings - a practical guide.
    Forstmeier W; Wagenmakers EJ; Parker TH
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2017 Nov; 92(4):1941-1968. PubMed ID: 27879038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Decision qualities of Bayes factor and p value-based hypothesis testing.
    Jeon M; De Boeck P
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Jun; 22(2):340-360. PubMed ID: 28594227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How to reduce false positive results when undertaking in vitro genotoxicity testing and thus avoid unnecessary follow-up animal tests: Report of an ECVAM Workshop.
    Kirkland D; Pfuhler S; Tweats D; Aardema M; Corvi R; Darroudi F; Elhajouji A; Glatt H; Hastwell P; Hayashi M; Kasper P; Kirchner S; Lynch A; Marzin D; Maurici D; Meunier JR; Müller L; Nohynek G; Parry J; Parry E; Thybaud V; Tice R; van Benthem J; Vanparys P; White P
    Mutat Res; 2007 Mar; 628(1):31-55. PubMed ID: 17293159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The continuing misuse of null hypothesis significance testing in biological anthropology.
    Smith RJ
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2018 May; 166(1):236-245. PubMed ID: 29345299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Empirical Bayes screening of many p-values with applications to microarray studies.
    Datta S; Datta S
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1987-94. PubMed ID: 15691856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Resampling-based empirical Bayes multiple testing procedures for controlling generalized tail probability and expected value error rates: focus on the false discovery rate and simulation study.
    Dudoit S; Gilbert HN; van der Laan MJ
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):716-44. PubMed ID: 18932138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Rules of the Game Called Psychological Science.
    Bakker M; van Dijk A; Wicherts JM
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2012 Nov; 7(6):543-54. PubMed ID: 26168111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Degrees of Freedom in Planning, Running, Analyzing, and Reporting Psychological Studies: A Checklist to Avoid
    Wicherts JM; Veldkamp CL; Augusteijn HE; Bakker M; van Aert RC; van Assen MA
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1832. PubMed ID: 27933012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Current controversies: Null hypothesis significance testing.
    Sedgwick PM; Hammer A; Kesmodel US; Pedersen LH
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Jun; 101(6):624-627. PubMed ID: 35451497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Controlling the rate of Type I error over a large set of statistical tests.
    Keselman HJ; Cribbie R; Holland B
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2002 May; 55(Pt 1):27-39. PubMed ID: 12034010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.