These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27714666)

  • 41. A characterization of performance by men and women in a virtual Morris water task: a large and reliable sex difference.
    Astur RS; Ortiz ML; Sutherland RJ
    Behav Brain Res; 1998 Jun; 93(1-2):185-90. PubMed ID: 9659999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Mongolian gerbils learn to navigate in complex virtual spaces.
    Thurley K; Henke J; Hermann J; Ludwig B; Tatarau C; Wätzig A; Herz AV; Grothe B; Leibold C
    Behav Brain Res; 2014 Jun; 266():161-8. PubMed ID: 24631394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Spatial radial maze procedures and setups to dissociate local and distal relational spatial frameworks in humans.
    Bertholet L; Escobar MT; Depré M; Chavan CF; Giuliani F; Gisquet-Verrier P; Preissmann D; Schenk F
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Sep; 253():126-41. PubMed ID: 26096715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Eye tracking, strategies, and sex differences in virtual navigation.
    Andersen NE; Dahmani L; Konishi K; Bohbot VD
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2012 Jan; 97(1):81-9. PubMed ID: 22001012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effects of age on virtual environment place navigation and allocentric cognitive mapping.
    Moffat SD; Resnick SM
    Behav Neurosci; 2002 Oct; 116(5):851-9. PubMed ID: 12369805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Detecting allocentric and egocentric navigation deficits in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder using virtual reality.
    Mohammadi A; Hesami E; Kargar M; Shams J
    Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2018 Apr; 28(3):398-415. PubMed ID: 28880126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Verbalizing, visualizing, and navigating: The effect of strategies on encoding a large-scale virtual environment.
    Kraemer DJ; Schinazi VR; Cawkwell PB; Tekriwal A; Epstein RA; Thompson-Schill SL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Apr; 43(4):611-621. PubMed ID: 27668486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Contributions of sex, testosterone, and androgen receptor CAG repeat number to virtual Morris water maze performance.
    Nowak NT; Diamond MP; Land SJ; Moffat SD
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2014 Mar; 41():13-22. PubMed ID: 24495604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Gender differences in navigation performance are associated with differential theta and high-gamma activities in the hippocampus and parahippocampus.
    Pu Y; Cornwell BR; Cheyne D; Johnson BW
    Behav Brain Res; 2020 Aug; 391():112664. PubMed ID: 32434063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Variations in cognitive maps: understanding individual differences in navigation.
    Weisberg SM; Schinazi VR; Newcombe NS; Shipley TF; Epstein RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):669-682. PubMed ID: 24364725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Individual differences in spatial learning from computer-simulated environments.
    Waller D
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2000 Dec; 6(4):307-21. PubMed ID: 11218340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Men and women differ in object memory but not performance of a virtual radial maze.
    Levy LJ; Astur RS; Frick KM
    Behav Neurosci; 2005 Aug; 119(4):853-62. PubMed ID: 16187814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Sex differences on the competitive place task in the water maze: The influence of peripheral pool time on spatial navigation performance in rats.
    Devan BD; Tobin EL; Dunn EN; Magalis C
    Behav Processes; 2016 Nov; 132():34-41. PubMed ID: 27693532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The path more travelled: Time pressure increases reliance on familiar route-based strategies during navigation.
    Brunyé TT; Wood MD; Houck LA; Taylor HA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Aug; 70(8):1439-1452. PubMed ID: 27156528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Dopamine depletion in either the dorsomedial or dorsolateral striatum impairs egocentric Cincinnati water maze performance while sparing allocentric Morris water maze learning.
    Braun AA; Amos-Kroohs RM; Gutierrez A; Lundgren KH; Seroogy KB; Skelton MR; Vorhees CV; Williams MT
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2015 Feb; 118():55-63. PubMed ID: 25451306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Instructions matter: Individual differences in navigation strategy and ability.
    Boone AP; Maghen B; Hegarty M
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Oct; 47(7):1401-1414. PubMed ID: 31102190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Quantitative and qualitative sex differences in spatial navigation.
    Lövdén M; Herlitz A; Schellenbach M; Grossman-Hutter B; Krüger A; Lindenberger U
    Scand J Psychol; 2007 Oct; 48(5):353-8. PubMed ID: 17877549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The effects of apparatus design and test procedure on learning and memory performance of C57BL/6J mice on the Barnes maze.
    O'Leary TP; Brown RE
    J Neurosci Methods; 2012 Jan; 203(2):315-24. PubMed ID: 21982740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Evidence for the influence of testosterone in the performance of spatial navigation in a virtual water maze in women but not in men.
    Burkitt J; Widman D; Saucier DM
    Horm Behav; 2007 May; 51(5):649-54. PubMed ID: 17462646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Differential navigational strategies during spatial learning in a new modified version of the Oasis maze.
    Concha-Miranda M; More J; Grinspun N; Sanchez C; Paula-Lima A; Valdés JL
    Behav Brain Res; 2020 May; 385():112555. PubMed ID: 32109438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.