These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

440 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27714945)

  • 41. Effect of High-frequency (10-kHz) Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Petersen EA; Stauss TG; Scowcroft JA; Brooks ES; White JL; Sills SM; Amirdelfan K; Guirguis MN; Xu J; Yu C; Nairizi A; Patterson DG; Tsoulfas KC; Creamer MJ; Galan V; Bundschu RH; Paul CA; Mehta ND; Choi H; Sayed D; Lad SP; DiBenedetto DJ; Sethi KA; Goree JH; Bennett MT; Harrison NJ; Israel AF; Chang P; Wu PW; Gekht G; Argoff CE; Nasr CE; Taylor RS; Subbaroyan J; Gliner BE; Caraway DL; Mekhail NA
    JAMA Neurol; 2021 Jun; 78(6):687-698. PubMed ID: 33818600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Spinal cord stimulation in severe cases of complex regional pain syndrome: A retrospective cohort study with long-term follow-up.
    Eriksen LE; Terkelsen AJ; Blichfeldt-Eckhardt MR; Sørensen JCH; Meier K
    Eur J Pain; 2021 Nov; 25(10):2212-2225. PubMed ID: 34196075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Prospective Evaluation of Patient Usage of Above and Below Threshold Waveforms With Traditional Spinal Cord Stimulation Devices.
    Owusu S; Huynh A; Gruenthal E; Prusik J; Owusu-Sarpong S; Cherala R; Peng S; Pilitsis JG; McCallum SE
    Neuromodulation; 2017 Aug; 20(6):567-574. PubMed ID: 28699301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of Conventional and Kilohertz Frequency Epidural Stimulation in Patients Undergoing Trialing for Spinal Cord Stimulation: Clinical Considerations.
    Reddy CG; Dalm BD; Flouty OE; Gillies GT; Howard MA; Brennan TJ
    World Neurosurg; 2016 Apr; 88():586-591. PubMed ID: 26585728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Randomized Placebo-/Sham-Controlled Trials of Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Systematic Review and Methodological Appraisal.
    Duarte RV; McNicol E; Colloca L; Taylor RS; North RB; Eldabe S
    Neuromodulation; 2020 Jan; 23(1):10-18. PubMed ID: 31305001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Study Protocol Using Human Spinal Cord Recording Comparing Safety, Efficacy, and Neurophysiological Responses Between Patients Being Treated With Evoked Compound Action Potential-Controlled Closed-Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation or Open-Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation (the Evoke Study).
    Levy R; Deer TR; Poree L; Rosen SM; Kapural L; Amirdelfan K; Soliday N; Leitner A; Mekhail N
    Neuromodulation; 2019 Apr; 22(3):317-326. PubMed ID: 30828946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Burst SCS Microdosing Is as Efficacious as Standard Burst SCS in Treating Chronic Back and Leg Pain: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Vesper J; Slotty P; Schu S; Poeggel-Kraemer K; Littges H; Van Looy P; Agnesi F; Venkatesan L; Van Havenbergh T
    Neuromodulation; 2019 Feb; 22(2):190-193. PubMed ID: 30456795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Pain Relief in CRPS-II after Spinal Cord and Motor Cortex Simultaneous Dual Stimulation.
    Lopez WO; Barbosa DC; Teixera MJ; Paiz M; Moura L; Monaco BA; Fonoff ET
    Pain Physician; 2016 May; 19(4):E631-5. PubMed ID: 27228530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Long-term efficacy of spinal cord stimulation for chronic primary neuropathic pain in the contemporary era: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Fatima K; Javed SO; Saleem A; Marsia S; Zafar R; Noorani K; Kumar S; Ali SM; Ismail I; Hashim I; Ganatra FA
    J Neurosurg Sci; 2024 Feb; 68(1):128-139. PubMed ID: 36943763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Real-World Evidence and Outcomes Data.
    Chakravarthy K; Malayil R; Kirketeig T; Deer T
    Pain Med; 2019 Jun; 20(Suppl 1):S47-S57. PubMed ID: 31152177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Spinal Cord Stimulation.
    Rock AK; Truong H; Park YL; Pilitsis JG
    Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2019 Apr; 30(2):169-194. PubMed ID: 30898269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Utilization of Concurrent Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation and Dorsal Column Spinal Cord Stimulation in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome.
    Ghosh P; Gungor S
    Neuromodulation; 2021 Jun; 24(4):769-773. PubMed ID: 32162402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The Impact of Tobacco Smoking on Spinal Cord Stimulation Effectiveness in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Patients.
    Mekhail N; Costandi S; Mehanny DS; Armanyous S; Saied O; Taco-Vasquez E; Saweris Y
    Neuromodulation; 2020 Jan; 23(1):133-139. PubMed ID: 31710411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Improvements in Therapy Experience With Evoked Compound Action Potential Controlled, Closed-Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation-Primary Outcome of the ECHO-MAC Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Will A; Fishman M; Schultz D; Danko M; Verill D; Davies C; Retterath P; Miller N; Tonder L; Johanek L; Dinsmoor D; Tan Y; Franke A; Soghomonyan S
    J Pain; 2024 Nov; 25(11):104646. PubMed ID: 39094810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Improved Pain Relief With Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation for Two Weeks in Patients Using Tonic Stimulation: Results From a Small Clinical Study.
    Courtney P; Espinet A; Mitchell B; Russo M; Muir A; Verrills P; Davis K
    Neuromodulation; 2015 Jul; 18(5):361-6. PubMed ID: 25879884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Spinal cord stimulation for complex regional pain syndrome: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effectiveness literature and assessment of prognostic factors.
    Taylor RS; Van Buyten JP; Buchser E
    Eur J Pain; 2006 Feb; 10(2):91-101. PubMed ID: 16310712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Outcomes of a Multicenter, Prospective, Crossover, Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Subperception Spinal Cord Stimulation at ≤1.2 kHz in Previously Implanted Subjects.
    North J; Loudermilk E; Lee A; Sachdeva H; Kaiafas D; Washabaugh E; Sheth S; Scowcroft J; Mekhail N; Lampert B; Yearwood T; Shaw E; Atallah J; McLeod C; Han J; Yu C; Sedrak M; Lucas R; Trobridge A; Hegarty J; Miller N; Chen L; Jain R
    Neuromodulation; 2020 Jan; 23(1):102-108. PubMed ID: 31265205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Patient Outcomes and Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Retrospective Case Series Evaluating Patient Satisfaction, Pain Scores, and Opioid Requirements.
    Sanders RA; Moeschler SM; Gazelka HM; Lamer TJ; Wang Z; Qu W; Hoelzer BC
    Pain Pract; 2016 Sep; 16(7):899-904. PubMed ID: 26310826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) Trial Outcomes After Conversion to a Multiple Waveform SCS System.
    Haider N; Ligham D; Quave B; Harum KE; Garcia EA; Gilmore CA; Miller N; Moore GA; Bains A; Lechleiter K; Jain R
    Neuromodulation; 2018 Jul; 21(5):504-507. PubMed ID: 29889356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Multi-waveform Spinal Cord Stimulation with High Frequency Electromagnetic Coupled (HF-EMC) Powered Implanted Electrode Array and Receiver for the Treatment of Chronic Back and Leg Pain (SURF Study).
    Bolash R; Creamer M; Rauck R; Vahedifar P; Calodney A; Fox I; Ozaktay C; Vanquathem N
    Pain Physician; 2022 Jan; 25(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 35051146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.