These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Serial search for targets defined by divergence or deformation of optic flow. Braddick OJ; Holliday IE Perception; 1991; 20(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 1762876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Limitations in attending to a feature value for overriding stimulus-driven interference. Kumada T Percept Psychophys; 1999 Jan; 61(1):61-79. PubMed ID: 10070200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Electrophysiological evidence for parallel and serial processing during visual search. Luck SJ; Hillyard SA Percept Psychophys; 1990 Dec; 48(6):603-17. PubMed ID: 2270192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Strategies of flanker coprocessing in single and dual tasks. Hübner R; Lehle C J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):103-23. PubMed ID: 17311482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Search via recursive rejection (SERR): visual search for single and dual form-conjunction targets. Müller HJ; Humphreys GW; Donnelly N J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Apr; 20(2):235-58. PubMed ID: 8189190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Performance differences as a function of stimulus-response compatibility with rapid serial visual presentation and spatially distributed presentation styles. Utesch BS; Lang VA Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Apr; 82(2):643-7. PubMed ID: 8724941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Parallel versus serial processing in visual search: further evidence from subadditive effects of visual quality. Egeth H; Dagenbach D J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 May; 17(2):551-60. PubMed ID: 1830092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Size scaling and spatial factors in visual attention. Goolkasian P Am J Psychol; 1997; 110(3):397-415. PubMed ID: 9339537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. An inter-item similarity model unifying feature and conjunction search. Phillips S; Takeda Y; Kumada T Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(22):3867-80. PubMed ID: 16920177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Intertrial repetition facilitates selection in time: common mechanisms underlie spatial and temporal search. Yashar A; Lamy D Psychol Sci; 2010 Feb; 21(2):243-51. PubMed ID: 20424053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Serial attention mechanisms in visual search: a direct behavioral demonstration. Bricolo E; Gianesini T; Fanini A; Bundesen C; Chelazzi L J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Oct; 14(7):980-93. PubMed ID: 12419123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Feature analysis and the role of similarity in preattentive vision. Nothdurft HC Percept Psychophys; 1992 Oct; 52(4):355-75. PubMed ID: 1437470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Local and global factors of similarity in visual search. von Grünau M; Dubé S; Galera C Percept Psychophys; 1994 May; 55(5):575-92. PubMed ID: 8008558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Does the identification of simple features require serial processing? Folk CL; Egeth H J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Feb; 15(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 2522536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]