These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27716067)

  • 1. Improving measurement-invariance assessments: correcting entrenched testing deficiencies.
    Hayduk LA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Oct; 16(1):130. PubMed ID: 27716067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of error structure misspecification when testing measurement invariance and latent-factor mean difference using MIMIC and multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis.
    Joo SH; Kim ES
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Dec; 51(6):2688-2699. PubMed ID: 30242617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement invariance via multigroup SEM: Issues and solutions with chi-square-difference tests.
    Yuan KH; Chan W
    Psychol Methods; 2016 Sep; 21(3):405-26. PubMed ID: 27266799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can student self-ratings be compared with peer ratings? A study of measurement invariance of multisource feedback.
    Lee KL; Tsai SL; Chiu YT; Ho MJ
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2016 May; 21(2):401-13. PubMed ID: 26387118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing groups on latent variables: a structural equation modeling approach.
    Dimitrov DM
    Work; 2006; 26(4):429-36. PubMed ID: 16788262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shame for disrespecting evidence: the personal consequences of insufficient respect for structural equation model testing.
    Hayduk LA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Nov; 14():124. PubMed ID: 25430437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The maximum likelihood alignment approach to testing for approximate measurement invariance: A paradigmatic cross-cultural application.
    Byrne BM; van de Vijver FJR
    Psicothema; 2017 Nov; 29(4):539-551. PubMed ID: 29048316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Permutation randomization methods for testing measurement equivalence and detecting differential item functioning in multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis.
    Jorgensen TD; Kite BA; Chen PY; Short SD
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Dec; 23(4):708-728. PubMed ID: 29172611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What to do when scalar invariance fails: The extended alignment method for multi-group factor analysis comparison of latent means across many groups.
    Marsh HW; Guo J; Parker PD; Nagengast B; Asparouhov T; Muthén B; Dicke T
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Sep; 23(3):524-545. PubMed ID: 28080078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing consistency in oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) across gender and stability of OHRQoL over time for adolescents using Structural Equation Modeling.
    Wong MC; Lau AW; Lam KF; McGrath C; Lu HX
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2011 Aug; 39(4):325-35. PubMed ID: 21198762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Population performance of SEM parceling strategies under measurement and structural model misspecification.
    Rhemtulla M
    Psychol Methods; 2016 Sep; 21(3):348-368. PubMed ID: 26828780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Role of Measurement Quality on Practical Guidelines for Assessing Measurement and Structural Invariance.
    Kang Y; McNeish DM; Hancock GR
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2016 Aug; 76(4):533-561. PubMed ID: 29795877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian SEM for Specification Search Problems in Testing Factorial Invariance.
    Shi D; Song H; Liao X; Terry R; Snyder LA
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(4):430-444. PubMed ID: 28429965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigating the factorial invariance of the 28-item DBQ across genders and age groups: an Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling study.
    Mattsson M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Sep; 48():379-96. PubMed ID: 22664704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Decomposing model fit: measurement vs. theory in organizational research using latent variables.
    O'Boyle EH; Williams LJ
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Jan; 96(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 20718518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurement invariance in longitudinal clinical research assuming change from development and intervention.
    Pentz MA; Chou CP
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1994 Jun; 62(3):450-62. PubMed ID: 8063972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exploratory structural equation modeling: an integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.
    Marsh HW; Morin AJ; Parker PD; Kaur G
    Annu Rev Clin Psychol; 2014; 10():85-110. PubMed ID: 24313568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An essay on measurement and factorial invariance.
    Meredith W; Teresi JA
    Med Care; 2006 Nov; 44(11 Suppl 3):S69-77. PubMed ID: 17060838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testing measurement invariance in longitudinal data with ordered-categorical measures.
    Liu Y; Millsap RE; West SG; Tein JY; Tanaka R; Grimm KJ
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Sep; 22(3):486-506. PubMed ID: 27213981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A more general model for testing measurement invariance and differential item functioning.
    Bauer DJ
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Sep; 22(3):507-526. PubMed ID: 27266798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.