211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27716264)
1. Current state of ethics literature synthesis: a systematic review of reviews.
Mertz M; Kahrass H; Strech D
BMC Med; 2016 Oct; 14(1):152. PubMed ID: 27716264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What methods do reviews of normative ethics literature use for search, selection, analysis, and synthesis? In-depth results from a systematic review of reviews.
Mertz M; Strech D; Kahrass H
Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):261. PubMed ID: 29258598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Quality appraisal in systematic reviews of normative literature. A problem analysis].
Mertz M
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2017 Nov; 127-128():11-20. PubMed ID: 28863987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evidence-based ethics--what it should be and what it shouldn't.
Strech D
BMC Med Ethics; 2008 Oct; 9():16. PubMed ID: 18937838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Systematic reviews of empirical literature on bioethical topics: Results from a meta-review.
Mertz M; Nobile H; Kahrass H
Nurs Ethics; 2020 Jun; 27(4):960-978. PubMed ID: 32238039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Informative value of Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) in Health Technology Assessment (HTA).
Brettschneider C; Lühmann D; Raspe H
GMS Health Technol Assess; 2011 Feb; 7():Doc01. PubMed ID: 21468289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How to tackle the conundrum of quality appraisal in systematic reviews of normative literature/information? Analysing the problems of three possible strategies (translation of a German paper).
Mertz M
BMC Med Ethics; 2019 Nov; 20(1):81. PubMed ID: 31727134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How factual do we want the facts? Criteria for a critical appraisal of empirical research for use in ethics.
Strech D
J Med Ethics; 2010 Apr; 36(4):222-5. PubMed ID: 20338933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethics in Canadian health technology assessment: a descriptive review.
DeJean D; Giacomini M; Schwartz L; Miller FA
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Oct; 25(4):463-9. PubMed ID: 19845976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Toward a procedure for integrating moral issues in health technology assessment.
Hofmann B
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2005; 21(3):312-8. PubMed ID: 16110710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].
Amato L; Colais P; Davoli M; Ferroni E; Fusco D; Minozzi S; Moirano F; Sciattella P; Vecchi S; Ventura M; Perucci CA
Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100. PubMed ID: 23851286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Why ethics should be part of health technology assessment.
Hofmann BM
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(4):423-9. PubMed ID: 18828936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
Manchikanti L
Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Ethics in health technology assessment. Review].
García-León FJ
J Healthc Qual Res; 2019; 34(1):20-28. PubMed ID: 30723066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Individual health services.
Schnell-Inderst P; Hunger T; Hintringer K; Schwarzer R; Seifert-Klauss VR; Gothe H; Wasem J; Siebert U
GMS Health Technol Assess; 2011; 7():Doc05. PubMed ID: 21966301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The normative background of empirical-ethical research: first steps towards a transparent and reasoned approach in the selection of an ethical theory.
Salloch S; Wäscher S; Vollmann J; Schildmann J
BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Apr; 16():20. PubMed ID: 25889221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Harmonization of ethics in health technology assessment: a revision of the Socratic approach.
Hofmann B; Droste S; Oortwijn W; Cleemput I; Sacchini D
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2014 Jan; 30(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 24499630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
