These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27716824)

  • 21. The effects of cyclists present at rural intersections on speed behavior and workload of car drivers: a driving simulator study.
    Duivenvoorden K; Hogema J; Hagenzieker M; Wegman F
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16():254-9. PubMed ID: 25000155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The 'Saw but Forgot' error: A role for short-term memory failures in understanding junction crashes?
    Robbins CJ; Allen HA; Miller KA; Chapman P
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0222905. PubMed ID: 31545850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An exploratory study of drivers' EEG response during emergent collision avoidance.
    Li X; Yang L; Yan X
    J Safety Res; 2022 Sep; 82():241-250. PubMed ID: 36031251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. What does the driver look at? The influence of intersection characteristics on attention allocation and driving behavior.
    Werneke J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Mar; 45():610-9. PubMed ID: 22269548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Towards an assistance strategy that reduces unnecessary collision alarms: An examination of the driver's perceived need for assistance.
    Kaß C; Schmidt GJ; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Jun; 25(2):291-302. PubMed ID: 30035557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. How to present collision warnings at intersections?--a comparison of different approaches.
    Werneke J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Mar; 52():91-9. PubMed ID: 23305968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Examination of drivers' cell phone use behavior at intersections by using naturalistic driving data.
    Xiong H; Bao S; Sayer J; Kato K
    J Safety Res; 2015 Sep; 54():89-93. PubMed ID: 26403907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of proposed countermeasures for dilemma zone at signalized intersections based on cellular automata simulations.
    Wu Y; Abdel-Aty M; Ding Y; Jia B; Shi Q; Yan X
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():69-78. PubMed ID: 28911878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Available sight distance on existing highways: Meeting stopping sight distance requirements of an aging population.
    Gargoum SA; Tawfeek MH; El-Basyouny K; Koch JC
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Mar; 112():56-68. PubMed ID: 29316487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Heavy-truck drivers' following behavior with intervention of an integrated, in-vehicle crash warning system: a field evaluation.
    Bao S; LeBlanc DJ; Sayer JR; Flannagan C
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):687-97. PubMed ID: 23156615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Structural equations modeling of real-time crash risk variation in car-following incorporating visual perceptual, vehicular, and roadway factors.
    Ding N; Jiao N; Zhu S; Liu B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Dec; 133():105298. PubMed ID: 31557617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effective cues for accelerating young drivers' time to transfer control following a period of conditional automation.
    Wright TJ; Agrawal R; Samuel S; Wang Y; Zilberstein S; Fisher DL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():14-20. PubMed ID: 29031513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of collision warning characteristics on driving behaviors and safety in connected vehicle environments.
    Zhao W; Gong S; Zhao D; Liu F; Sze NN; Huang H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Jun; 186():107053. PubMed ID: 37030178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Towards unpacking older drivers' visual-motor coordination: A gaze-based integrated driving assessment.
    Sun QC; Xia JC; He J; Foster J; Falkmer T; Lee H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Apr; 113():85-96. PubMed ID: 29407672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Steering or braking avoidance response in SHRP2 rear-end crashes and near-crashes: A decision tree approach.
    Sarkar A; Hickman JS; McDonald AD; Huang W; Vogelpohl T; Markkula G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 May; 154():106055. PubMed ID: 33691227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Using a V2V- and V2I-based collision warning system to improve vehicle interaction at unsignalized intersections.
    Huang Y; Wang Y; Yan X; Li X; Duan K; Xue Q
    J Safety Res; 2022 Dec; 83():282-293. PubMed ID: 36481019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Experiences of model year 2011 Dodge and Jeep owners with collision avoidance and related technologies.
    Cicchino JB; McCartt AT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16():298-303. PubMed ID: 24983299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Analysis of car driver responses to avoid car-to-cyclist perpendicular collisions based on drive recorder data and driving simulator experiments.
    Zhao Y; Miyahara T; Mizuno K; Ito D; Han Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Feb; 150():105862. PubMed ID: 33276185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An improved automated braking system for rear-end collisions: A study based on a driving simulator experiment.
    Hang J; Yan X; Li X; Duan K; Yang J; Xue Q
    J Safety Res; 2022 Feb; 80():416-427. PubMed ID: 35249623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A cross-cultural comparison of visual search strategies and response times in road hazard perception testing.
    Di Stasi LL; Diaz-Piedra C; Morales JM; Kurapov A; Tagliabue M; Bjärtå A; Megias A; Bernhardsson J; Paschenko S; Romero S; Cándido A; Catena A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105785. PubMed ID: 33161370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.