These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27716854)

  • 1. Comparison of Videostroboscopy to Stroboscopy Derived From High-Speed Videoendoscopy for Evaluating Patients With Vocal Fold Mass Lesions.
    Powell ME; Deliyski DD; Hillman RE; Zeitels SM; Burns JA; Mehta DD
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2016 Nov; 25(4):576-589. PubMed ID: 27716854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Utility of Laryngeal High-speed Videoendoscopy in Clinical Voice Assessment.
    Zacharias SRC; Deliyski DD; Gerlach TT
    J Voice; 2018 Mar; 32(2):216-220. PubMed ID: 28596101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy of Videostroboscopy and High-Speed Videoendoscopy to Obtain Functional Outcomes From Perioperative Ratings in Patients With Vocal Fold Mass Lesions.
    Powell ME; Deliyski DD; Zeitels SM; Burns JA; Hillman RE; Gerlach TT; Mehta DD
    J Voice; 2020 Sep; 34(5):769-782. PubMed ID: 31005449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Real-time Simultaneous DKG and 2D DKG Using High-speed Digital Camera.
    Kang DH; Wang SG; Park HJ; Lee JC; Jeon GR; Choi IS; Kim SJ; Shin BJ
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):247.e1-247.e7. PubMed ID: 27839706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Current role of stroboscopy in laryngeal imaging.
    Mehta DD; Hillman RE
    Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Dec; 20(6):429-36. PubMed ID: 22931908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Videostroboscopy Versus High-Speed Videoendoscopy: Factors Influencing Ratings of Laryngeal Oscillation.
    Fujiki RB; Croegaert-Koch CK; Thibeault SL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 May; 66(5):1496-1510. PubMed ID: 37040690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stroboscopy in detection of laryngeal dysplasia effectiveness and limitations.
    Djukic V; Milovanovic J; Jotic AD; Vukasinovic M
    J Voice; 2014 Mar; 28(2):262.e13-262.e21. PubMed ID: 24275461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Feasibility of Clinical Endoscopy and Stroboscopy in Children With Bilateral Vocal Fold Lesions.
    Zacharias SR; Brehm SB; Weinrich B; Kelchner L; Tabangin M; de Alarcon A
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2016 Nov; 25(4):598-604. PubMed ID: 27893084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Objective Measures of Stroboscopy and High-Speed Video.
    Woo P
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2020; 85():25-44. PubMed ID: 33166979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A portable high-speed camera system for vocal fold examinations.
    Hertegård S; Larsson H
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):681-7. PubMed ID: 25008381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of laryngostroboscopic evaluation on lesion size and glottal configuration: a revisit.
    Yiu EM; Lau VC; Ma EP; Chan KM; Barrett E
    Laryngoscope; 2014 Jul; 124(7):1638-44. PubMed ID: 24222186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Real-time dual visualization of two different modalities for the evaluation of vocal fold vibration - Laryngeal videoendoscopy and 2D scanning videokymography: Preliminary report.
    Kim GH; Wang SG; Lee BJ; Park HJ; Kim YC; Kim HS; Sohn KT; Kwon SB
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2017 Apr; 44(2):174-181. PubMed ID: 27421819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The interrater reliability of stroboscopy evaluations.
    Nawka T; Konerding U
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):812.e1-10. PubMed ID: 22516314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computerized Analysis of Vocal Folds Vibration From Laryngeal Videostroboscopy.
    Gora S; Yavin N; Elad D; Wolf M; Primov-Fever A
    J Voice; 2016 Jul; 30(4):478-84. PubMed ID: 26159427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Voice-Vibratory Assessment With Laryngeal Imaging (VALI) Form: Reliability of Rating Stroboscopy and High-speed Videoendoscopy.
    Poburka BJ; Patel RR; Bless DM
    J Voice; 2017 Jul; 31(4):513.e1-513.e14. PubMed ID: 28040342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High-speed laryngeal imaging compared with videostroboscopy in healthy subjects.
    Kendall KA
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Mar; 135(3):274-81. PubMed ID: 19289706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Objective measures of laryngeal imaging: what have we learned since Dr. Paul Moore.
    Woo P
    J Voice; 2014 Jan; 28(1):69-81. PubMed ID: 24094798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vocal Fold Vibratory Changes Following Surgical Intervention.
    Chen W; Woo P; Murry T
    J Voice; 2016 Mar; 30(2):224-7. PubMed ID: 26028368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Preliminary Quantitative Comparison of Vibratory Amplitude Using Rigid and Flexible Stroboscopic Assessment.
    Hosbach-Cannon CJ; Lowell SY; Kelley RT; Colton RH
    J Voice; 2016 Jul; 30(4):485-92. PubMed ID: 26149662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Objective measurement of mucosal wave parameters in diagnosing benign lesions of the vocal folds.
    Krasnodębska P; Szkiełkowska A; Miaśkiewicz B; Włodarczyk E; Domeracka-Kołodziej A; Skarżyński H
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2019 Jul; 44(2):73-78. PubMed ID: 29318925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.