These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27717080)

  • 1. An illustrated comparison of processing methods for phase MRI and QSM: removal of background field contributions from sources outside the region of interest.
    Schweser F; Robinson SD; de Rochefort L; Li W; Bredies K
    NMR Biomed; 2017 Apr; 30(4):. PubMed ID: 27717080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accelerated mapping of magnetic susceptibility using 3D planes-on-a-paddlewheel (POP) EPI at ultra-high field strength.
    Stäb D; Bollmann S; Langkammer C; Bredies K; Barth M
    NMR Biomed; 2017 Apr; 30(4):. PubMed ID: 27763692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Joint 2D and 3D phase processing for quantitative susceptibility mapping: application to 2D echo-planar imaging.
    Wei H; Zhang Y; Gibbs E; Chen NK; Wang N; Liu C
    NMR Biomed; 2017 Apr; 30(4):. PubMed ID: 26887812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Overview of quantitative susceptibility mapping.
    Deistung A; Schweser F; Reichenbach JR
    NMR Biomed; 2017 Apr; 30(4):. PubMed ID: 27434134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Single-step quantitative susceptibility mapping with variational penalties.
    Chatnuntawech I; McDaniel P; Cauley SF; Gagoski BA; Langkammer C; Martin A; Grant PE; Wald LL; Setsompop K; Adalsteinsson E; Bilgic B
    NMR Biomed; 2017 Apr; 30(4):. PubMed ID: 27332141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Foundations of MRI phase imaging and processing for Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM).
    Schweser F; Deistung A; Reichenbach JR
    Z Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 26(1):6-34. PubMed ID: 26702760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Weak-harmonic regularization for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
    Milovic C; Bilgic B; Zhao B; Langkammer C; Tejos C; Acosta-Cabronero J
    Magn Reson Med; 2019 Feb; 81(2):1399-1411. PubMed ID: 30265767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integrated Laplacian-based phase unwrapping and background phase removal for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
    Li W; Avram AV; Wu B; Xiao X; Liu C
    NMR Biomed; 2014 Feb; 27(2):219-27. PubMed ID: 24357120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An illustrated comparison of processing methods for MR phase imaging and QSM: combining array coil signals and phase unwrapping.
    Robinson SD; Bredies K; Khabipova D; Dymerska B; Marques JP; Schweser F
    NMR Biomed; 2017 Apr; 30(4):. PubMed ID: 27619999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comprehensive numerical analysis of background phase correction with V-SHARP.
    Özbay PS; Deistung A; Feng X; Nanz D; Reichenbach JR; Schweser F
    NMR Biomed; 2017 Apr; 30(4):. PubMed ID: 27259117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nonlinear formulation of the magnetic field to source relationship for robust quantitative susceptibility mapping.
    Liu T; Wisnieff C; Lou M; Chen W; Spincemaille P; Wang Y
    Magn Reson Med; 2013 Feb; 69(2):467-76. PubMed ID: 22488774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A variational image-based approach to the correction of susceptibility artifacts in the alignment of diffusion weighted and structural MRI.
    Tao R; Fletcher PT; Gerber S; Whitaker RT
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2009; 21():664-75. PubMed ID: 19694302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Structural and functional quantitative susceptibility mapping from standard fMRI studies.
    Sun H; Seres P; Wilman AH
    NMR Biomed; 2017 Apr; 30(4):. PubMed ID: 27687150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preconditioned total field inversion (TFI) method for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
    Liu Z; Kee Y; Zhou D; Wang Y; Spincemaille P
    Magn Reson Med; 2017 Jul; 78(1):303-315. PubMed ID: 27464893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computational methods for image reconstruction.
    Chung J; Ruthotto L
    NMR Biomed; 2017 Apr; 30(4):. PubMed ID: 27226213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Background field removal technique based on non-regularized variable kernels sophisticated harmonic artifact reduction for phase data for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
    Kan H; Arai N; Takizawa M; Omori K; Kasai H; Kunitomo H; Hirose Y; Shibamoto Y
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Oct; 52():94-101. PubMed ID: 29902566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative susceptibility mapping using a superposed dipole inversion method: Application to intracranial hemorrhage.
    Sun H; Kate M; Gioia LC; Emery DJ; Butcher K; Wilman AH
    Magn Reson Med; 2016 Sep; 76(3):781-91. PubMed ID: 26414757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Susceptibility-weighted imaging: current status and future directions.
    Liu S; Buch S; Chen Y; Choi HS; Dai Y; Habib C; Hu J; Jung JY; Luo Y; Utriainen D; Wang M; Wu D; Xia S; Haacke EM
    NMR Biomed; 2017 Apr; 30(4):. PubMed ID: 27192086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Image artifacts on prostate diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: trade-offs at 1.5 Tesla and 3.0 Tesla.
    Mazaheri Y; Vargas HA; Nyman G; Akin O; Hricak H
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Aug; 20(8):1041-7. PubMed ID: 23830610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Real valued diffusion-weighted imaging using decorrelated phase filtering.
    Sprenger T; Sperl JI; Fernandez B; Haase A; Menzel MI
    Magn Reson Med; 2017 Feb; 77(2):559-570. PubMed ID: 26910122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.