159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27717917)
1. Comparison of breaking tests for the characterization of the interfacial strength of bilayer tablets.
Castrati L; Mazel V; Busignies V; Diarra H; Rossi A; Colombo P; Tchoreloff P
Int J Pharm; 2016 Nov; 513(1-2):709-716. PubMed ID: 27717917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tensile and shear methods for measuring strength of bilayer tablets.
Chang SY; Li JX; Sun CC
Int J Pharm; 2017 May; 523(1):121-126. PubMed ID: 28284920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of compaction properties and interfacial topography on the performance of bilayer tablets.
Kottala N; Abebe A; Sprockel O; Akseli I; Nikfar F; Cuitiño AM
Int J Pharm; 2012 Oct; 436(1-2):171-8. PubMed ID: 22728259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Axial strength test for round flat faced versus capsule shaped bilayer tablets.
Franck J; Abebe A; Keluskar R; Martin K; Majumdar A; Kottala N; Stamato H
Pharm Dev Technol; 2015 Mar; 20(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 24219774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Role of the elasticity of pharmaceutical materials on the interfacial mechanical strength of bilayer tablets.
Busignies V; Mazel V; Diarra H; Tchoreloff P
Int J Pharm; 2013 Nov; 457(1):260-7. PubMed ID: 24055440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of the Curvature of the Punches on the Shape of the Interface and the Delamination Tendency of Bilayer Tablets.
Castrati L; Mazel V; Diarra H; Busignies V; Tchoreloff P
J Pharm Sci; 2017 May; 106(5):1331-1338. PubMed ID: 28137698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Theoretical investigations into the influence of the position of a breaking line on the tensile failure of flat, round, bevel-edged tablets using finite element methodology (FEM) and its practical relevance for industrial tablet strength testing.
Podczeck F; Newton JM; Fromme P
Int J Pharm; 2014 Dec; 477(1-2):306-16. PubMed ID: 25455775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigations into the tensile failure of doubly-convex cylindrical tablets under diametral loading using finite element methodology.
Podczeck F; Drake KR; Newton JM
Int J Pharm; 2013 Sep; 454(1):412-24. PubMed ID: 23834836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of a new test for the easy characterization of the adhesion at the interface of bilayer tablets: proof-of-concept study by experimental design.
Busignies V; Mazel V; Diarra H; Tchoreloff P
Int J Pharm; 2014 Dec; 477(1-2):476-84. PubMed ID: 25445527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interfacial bonding in formulated bilayer tablets.
Chang SY; Sun CC
Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2020 Feb; 147():69-75. PubMed ID: 31870828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reevaluation of the diametral compression test for tablets using the flattened disc geometry.
Mazel V; Guerard S; Croquelois B; Kopp JB; Girardot J; Diarra H; Busignies V; Tchoreloff P
Int J Pharm; 2016 Nov; 513(1-2):669-677. PubMed ID: 27702696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimum Interfacial Bonding Strength for Bilayer Tablets Determined Using a Survival Test.
Chang SY; Sun CC
Pharm Res; 2019 Jul; 36(10):139. PubMed ID: 31359156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of tablet characteristics from residual stress distribution estimated by the finite element method.
Hayashi Y; Miura T; Shimada T; Onuki Y; Obata Y; Takayama K
J Pharm Sci; 2013 Oct; 102(10):3678-86. PubMed ID: 23897300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The bending strength of tablets with a breaking line--Comparison of the results of an elastic and a "brittle cracking" finite element model with experimental findings.
Podczeck F; Newton JM; Fromme P
Int J Pharm; 2015 Nov; 495(1):485-499. PubMed ID: 26363109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of manufacturing process parameters causing multilayer tablets delamination.
Bellini M; Walther M; Bodmeier R
Int J Pharm; 2019 Oct; 570():118607. PubMed ID: 31421200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictive model for tensile strength of pharmaceutical tablets based on local hardness measurements.
Juban A; Nouguier-Lehon C; Briancon S; Hoc T; Puel F
Int J Pharm; 2015 Jul; 490(1-2):438-45. PubMed ID: 26043825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Theoretical and experimental investigations into the delamination tendencies of bilayer tablets.
Podczeck F
Int J Pharm; 2011 Apr; 408(1-2):102-12. PubMed ID: 21316433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Review of bilayer tablet technology.
Abebe A; Akseli I; Sprockel O; Kottala N; Cuitiño AM
Int J Pharm; 2014 Jan; 461(1-2):549-58. PubMed ID: 24370841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Note on the Use of Diametrical Compression to Determine Tablet Tensile Strength.
Hilden J; Polizzi M; Zettler A
J Pharm Sci; 2017 Jan; 106(1):418-421. PubMed ID: 27686682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative analysis of the layer separation risk in bilayer tablets using terahertz pulsed imaging.
Niwa M; Hiraishi Y; Iwasaki N; Terada K
Int J Pharm; 2013 Aug; 452(1-2):249-56. PubMed ID: 23680735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
