382 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27718417)
1. Initial experience of automated breast volume scanning (ABVS) and ultrasound elastography in predicting breast cancer subtypes and staging.
Wang XL; Tao L; Zhou XL; Wei H; Sun JW
Breast; 2016 Dec; 30():130-135. PubMed ID: 27718417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of automated breast volume scanning and hand- held ultrasound in the detection of breast cancer: an analysis of 5,566 patient evaluations.
Choi WJ; Cha JH; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Kim H; Chae EY; Hong MJ
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(21):9101-5. PubMed ID: 25422185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A multicentered, randomized, controlled trial comparing radioguided seed localization to standard wire localization for nonpalpable, invasive and in situ breast carcinomas.
Lovrics PJ; Goldsmith CH; Hodgson N; McCready D; Gohla G; Boylan C; Cornacchi S; Reedijk M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Nov; 18(12):3407-14. PubMed ID: 21533657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical application of a color map pattern on shear-wave elastography for invasive breast cancer.
Lee S; Jung Y; Bae Y
Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 25(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 26979640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Sonographic criteria for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions using real-time spatial compound imaging in combination with XRES adaptive image processing].
Hahn M; Roessner L; Krainick-Strobel U; Gruber IV; Krämer B; Gall C; Siegmann KC; Wallwiener D; Kagan KO
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Jun; 33(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 20614412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of diffusion weighted imaging as supplement to dynamic contrast enhanced breast MRI: Can it help predict malignancy, histologic grade and recurrence?
Roknsharifi S; Fishman MDC; Agarwal MD; Brook A; Kharbanda V; Dialani V
Acad Radiol; 2019 Jul; 26(7):923-929. PubMed ID: 30293819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of conventional and automated breast volume ultrasound in the description and characterization of solid breast masses based on BI-RADS features.
Kim H; Cha JH; Oh HY; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Chae EY
Breast Cancer; 2014 Jul; 21(4):423-8. PubMed ID: 23086698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic Usefulness of Combination of Diffusion-weighted Imaging and T2WI, Including Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Breast Lesions: Assessment of Histologic Grade.
Kim KW; Kuzmiak CM; Kim YJ; Seo JY; Jung HK; Lee MS
Acad Radiol; 2018 May; 25(5):643-652. PubMed ID: 29339079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intrinsic subtypes and tumor grades in breast cancer are associated with distinct 3-D power Doppler sonographic vascular features.
Chang YC; Huang YS; Huang CS; Chen JH; Chang RF
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Aug; 83(8):1368-74. PubMed ID: 24932848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sensitivity and specificity of preoperative ultrasonography for diagnosing nodal metastases in patients with breast cancer.
Koehler KE; Ohlinger R
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Aug; 32(4):393-9. PubMed ID: 20938895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation of the ultrasound imaging of breast cancer and the expression of molecular biological indexes.
Xu J; Li F; Chang F
Pak J Pharm Sci; 2017 Jul; 30(4(Suppl.)):1425-1430. PubMed ID: 29043992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: detection in dependence of the BI-RADS categories.
Obenauer S; Sohns C; Werner C; Grabbe E
Breast J; 2006; 12(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 16409582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What are the characteristics of breast cancers misclassified as benign by quantitative ultrasound shear wave elastography?
Vinnicombe SJ; Whelehan P; Thomson K; McLean D; Purdie CA; Jordan LB; Hubbard S; Evans AJ
Eur Radiol; 2014 Apr; 24(4):921-6. PubMed ID: 24326756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography.
Obenauer S; Sohns C; Werner C; Grabbe E
J Digit Imaging; 2006 Sep; 19(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 16741664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and magnetic resonance imaging added to digital mammography in women with known breast cancers.
Kim WH; Chang JM; Moon HG; Yi A; Koo HR; Gweon HM; Moon WK
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jun; 26(6):1556-64. PubMed ID: 26376882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictive Factors for Positive Margin and the Surgical Learning Curve in Non-Palpable Breast Cancer After Wire-Guided Localization - Prospective Study of 214 Consecutive Patients.
Tóth D; Varga Z; Sebő É; Török M; Kovács I
Pathol Oncol Res; 2016 Jan; 22(1):209-15. PubMed ID: 26522009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultrasound Breast Elastographic Evaluation of Mass-Forming Ductal Carcinoma-in-situ with Histological Correlation - New Findings for a Toothpaste Sign.
Leong LC; Sim LS; Jara-Lazaro AR; Tan PH
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(5):2673-8. PubMed ID: 27268649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic findings of different histopathologic types of breast cancer.
Wang X; Xu P; Wang Y; Grant EG
Acta Radiol; 2011 Apr; 52(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 21498359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic Value of Ultrasound Elastography in the Differentiation of Breast Invasive Ductal Carcinoma and Ductal Carcinoma
Shi J; Chen L; Wang B; Zhang H; Xu L; Ye J; Liu Y; Shao Y; Sun X; Zou Y
Curr Med Imaging; 2023; 19(3):286-291. PubMed ID: 35899956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The importance of pre-operative needle core breast biopsy results on resected tissue volume, margin status, and cosmesis.
Polat AV; Soran A; Andacoglu O; Kamali Polat A; McGuire K; Diego E; Johnson R
J BUON; 2013; 18(3):601-7. PubMed ID: 24065470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
