386 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27718417)
21. Multicenter study of ultrasound real-time tissue elastography in 779 cases for the assessment of breast lesions: improved diagnostic performance by combining the BI-RADS®-US classification system with sonoelastography.
Wojcinski S; Farrokh A; Weber S; Thomas A; Fischer T; Slowinski T; Schmidt W; Degenhardt F
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Oct; 31(5):484-91. PubMed ID: 20408116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Accuracy of an automated breast volume ultrasound system for assessment of the pre-operative extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: comparison with a conventional handheld ultrasound examination.
Li N; Jiang YX; Zhu QL; Zhang J; Dai Q; Liu H; Yang Q; Wang HY; Lai XJ; Sun Q
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 39(12):2255-63. PubMed ID: 24035630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Staging of breast cancer with ultrasound.
Yang WT
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2011 Aug; 32(4):331-41. PubMed ID: 21782123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Virtual Touch tissue quantification cannot assess breast cancer lesions except for ductal carcinomas in situ and small invasive cancers: a retrospective study.
Tada K; Nishioka K; Kikuchi Y; Niwa T; Seto Y
World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 13():147. PubMed ID: 25886531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The influence of technical factors on sonoelastographic assessment of solid breast nodules.
Ciurea AI; Bolboaca SD; Ciortea CA; Botar-Jid C; Dudea SM
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Jan; 32 Suppl 1():S27-34. PubMed ID: 20938896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Diagnostic value of automated breast volume scanner in high-risk and small breast lesions].
Su KL; Xu HB; Zhang ZX; Pan N; He JL; Hu ZJ; Yang OO; Luo H; Yang HF; Liu LL
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 35(9):703-7. PubMed ID: 24332060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Uptake and washout of 99mTcV-dimercaptosuccinic acid and 99mTc-sestamibi in the assessment of histological type and grade in breast cancer.
Papantoniou V; Christodoulidou J; Papadaki E; Valotassiou V; Souvatzoglou M; Louvrou A; Feida H; Sotiropoulou M; Pampouras G; Michalas S; Zerva C
Nucl Med Commun; 2002 May; 23(5):461-7. PubMed ID: 11973487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Sonoelastography in the diagnosis of malignant and benign breast lesions: initial clinical experiences.
Hatzung G; Grunwald S; Zygmunt M; Geaid AA; Behrndt PO; Isermann R; Kohlmann T; Ohlinger R
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Dec; 31(6):596-603. PubMed ID: 20614414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Ultrasound findings and histological features of ductal carcinoma in situ detected by ultrasound examination alone.
Izumori A; Takebe K; Sato A
Breast Cancer; 2010 Apr; 17(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 19575283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Small (< or = 2-cm) breast cancer treated with US-guided radiofrequency ablation: feasibility study.
Fornage BD; Sneige N; Ross MI; Mirza AN; Kuerer HM; Edeiken BS; Ames FC; Newman LA; Babiera GV; Singletary SE
Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):215-24. PubMed ID: 14990810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Case quiz. Intracystic papillary carcinoma of the breast.
Muttarak M; Chaiwun B; Trakultivakorn H
Australas Radiol; 2002 Mar; 46(1):129-31. PubMed ID: 11966605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Re: Comparison of conventional and automated breast volume ultrasound in the description and characterization of solid breast masses based on BI-RADS features.
Meng ZY; Hu B; Shen E
Breast Cancer; 2014 Nov; 21(6):774-5. PubMed ID: 25224719
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Relationship between parameters from virtual touch tissue quantification (VTQ) imaging with clinicopathologic prognostic factors in women with invasive ductal breast cancer.
Xie J; Wu R; Xu HX; Yao MH; Xu G
Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2014; 7(10):6644-52. PubMed ID: 25400743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Breast cancer staging: Combined digital breast tomosynthesis and automated breast ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging.
Girometti R; Tomkova L; Cereser L; Zuiani C
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():188-195. PubMed ID: 30292265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Current improvements in breast ultrasound, with a special focus on elastography.
Tohno E; Ueno E
Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(3):200-4. PubMed ID: 18484155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Mammotome biopsy under ultrasound control in the diagnostics and treatment of nodular breast lesions - own experience.
Kibil W; Hodorowicz-Zaniewska D; Kulig J
Pol Przegl Chir; 2012 May; 84(5):242-6. PubMed ID: 22763299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Impact of breast ultrasound screening in gynecological practice].
Madjar H; Becker S; Doubek K; Horchler T; Mendoza M; Moisidis-Tesch C; Näther B; Niebling K; Pröls U; Schardt AR; Ulrich S; Zahn U
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Jun; 31(3):289-95. PubMed ID: 20408119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Nonpalpable breast carcinomas: long-term evaluation of 1,258 cases.
Veronesi U; Luini A; Botteri E; Zurrida S; Monti S; Galimberti V; Cassano E; Latronico A; Pizzamiglio M; Viale G; Vezzoli D; Rotmensz N; Musmeci S; Bassi F; Burgoa L; Maisonneuve P; Paganelli G; Veronesi P
Oncologist; 2010; 15(12):1248-52. PubMed ID: 21147866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Influence of age on PPV of sonographic BI-RADS categories 3, 4, and 5.
Fu CY; Hsu HH; Yu JC; Hsu GC; Hsu KF; Chan DC; Ku CH; Lu TC; Chu CH
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Jan; 32 Suppl 1():S8-13. PubMed ID: 20603785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Value of ultrasound in preoperative local staging in early breast cancer.
Varga D; Wöckel A; Wagner J; Koretz K; Kreienberg R; Sauer G
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Aug; 32(4):387-92. PubMed ID: 20408117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
