These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27720247)

  • 21. Embryo selection: the role of time-lapse monitoring.
    Kovacs P
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2014 Dec; 12():124. PubMed ID: 25510244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. New approaches to embryo selection.
    Montag M; Toth B; Strowitzki T
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2013 Nov; 27(5):539-46. PubMed ID: 23933036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. TILT: Time-Lapse Imaging Trial-a pragmatic, multi-centre, three-arm randomised controlled trial to assess the clinical effectiveness and safety of time-lapse imaging in in vitro fertilisation treatment.
    Bhide P; Srikantharajah A; Lanz D; Dodds J; Collins B; Zamora J; Chan D; Thangaratinam S; Khan KS
    Trials; 2020 Jul; 21(1):600. PubMed ID: 32611445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Time lapse (Embryoscope®) as a routine technique in the IVF laboratory: a useful tool for better embryo selection?].
    Freour T; Lammers J; Splingart C; Jean M; Barriere P
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Sep; 40(9):476-80. PubMed ID: 22901784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The use of time lapse photography in an in vitro fertilization programme for better selection for embryo transfer.
    Kovačič B; Hojnik N; Vlaisavljević V
    J Stem Cells; 2014; 9(1):39-52. PubMed ID: 25158088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of different oocyte insemination techniques on early and late morphokinetic parameters: retrospective analysis of 500 time-lapse monitored blastocysts.
    Bodri D; Sugimoto T; Serna JY; Kondo M; Kato R; Kawachiya S; Matsumoto T
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Nov; 104(5):1175-81.e1-2. PubMed ID: 26307686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Towards the selection of embryos with the greatest implantation potential.
    Khalife D; Abu-Musa A; Khalil A; Ghazeeri G
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Oct; 41(7):1010-1015. PubMed ID: 33432866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparing early embryo morphokinetics with time-lapse microscopy in patients with low and normal ovarian response to ovarian stimulation.
    Alexopoulou E; Pinborg A; Budtz-Jørgensen E; Zedeler A
    Reprod Biol; 2019 Jun; 19(2):127-132. PubMed ID: 30940450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Time-lapse imaging of preimplantation embryos.
    Conaghan J
    Semin Reprod Med; 2014 Mar; 32(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 24515908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Noninferiority, randomized, controlled trial comparing embryo development using media developed for sequential or undisturbed culture in a time-lapse setup.
    Hardarson T; Bungum M; Conaghan J; Meintjes M; Chantilis SJ; Molnar L; Gunnarsson K; Wikland M
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Dec; 104(6):1452-9.e1-4. PubMed ID: 26409153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A retrospective analysis of morphokinetic parameters according to the implantation outcome of IVF treatment.
    Wu L; Han W; Zhang X; Wang J; Liu W; Xiong S; Huang G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Feb; 197():186-90. PubMed ID: 26774387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of embryo morphokinetics after in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection in smoking and nonsmoking women.
    Fréour T; Dessolle L; Lammers J; Lattes S; Barrière P
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Jun; 99(7):1944-50. PubMed ID: 23465820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Time-lapse videography for embryo selection/de-selection: a bright future or fading star?
    Liu Y; Sakkas D; Afnan M; Matson P
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2020 Jun; 23(2):76-82. PubMed ID: 30963781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Non-invasive molecular assessment of human embryo development and implantation potential.
    Abreu CM; Thomas V; Knaggs P; Bunkheila A; Cruz A; Teixeira SR; Alpuim P; Francis LW; Gebril A; Ibrahim A; Margarit L; Gonzalez D; Freitas PP; Conlan RS; Mendes Pinto I
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2020 Jun; 157():112144. PubMed ID: 32250927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Atypical embryo phenotypes identified by time-lapse microscopy: high prevalence and association with embryo development.
    Athayde Wirka K; Chen AA; Conaghan J; Ivani K; Gvakharia M; Behr B; Suraj V; Tan L; Shen S
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Jun; 101(6):1637-48.e1-5. PubMed ID: 24726214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prevalence, consequence, and significance of reverse cleavage by human embryos viewed with the use of the Embryoscope time-lapse video system.
    Liu Y; Chapple V; Roberts P; Matson P
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Nov; 102(5):1295-1300.e2. PubMed ID: 25225070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Diagnosis of human preimplantation embryo viability.
    Gardner DK; Meseguer M; Rubio C; Treff NR
    Hum Reprod Update; 2015; 21(6):727-47. PubMed ID: 25567750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Time-lapse cinematography of dynamic changes occurring during in vitro development of human embryos.
    Mio Y; Maeda K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Dec; 199(6):660.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18823872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Microfluidics for mammalian embryo culture and selection: where do we stand now?
    Le Gac S; Nordhoff V
    Mol Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr; 23(4):213-226. PubMed ID: 27678484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A time to look back: analysis of morphokinetic characteristics of human embryo development.
    Herrero J; Tejera A; Albert C; Vidal C; de los Santos MJ; Meseguer M
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Dec; 100(6):1602-9.e1-4. PubMed ID: 24083877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.