These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27720654)

  • 1. Response to the article "Comparison of the performance of intraoral X-ray sensors using objective image quality assessment".
    Hellén-Halme K; Johansson C; Nilsson M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2016 Dec; 122(6):784-785. PubMed ID: 27720654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response to the article "Comparison of the performance of intraoral X-ray sensors using objective image quality assessment".
    Mah P; Udupa H
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2016 Dec; 122(6):785-786. PubMed ID: 27727114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the performance of intraoral X-ray sensors using objective image quality assessment.
    Hellén-Halme K; Johansson C; Nilsson M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2016 May; 121(5):e129-37. PubMed ID: 27068317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is digital better in dental radiography?
    Zdesar U; Fortuna T; Valantic B; Skrk D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):138-9. PubMed ID: 18375462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital imaging for dental caries.
    Wenzel A
    Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Apr; 44(2):319-38, vi. PubMed ID: 10740771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Signal-to-noise ratios of 6 intraoral digital sensors.
    Attaelmanan AG; Borg E; Gröndahl HG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 May; 91(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 11346743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital radiography: an overview.
    Parks ET; Williamson GF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2002 Nov; 3(4):23-39. PubMed ID: 12444400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of the X-ray spectrum at compact bone-titanium interfaces in digital dental radiography.
    Nicopoulou-Karayianni K; Koligliatis T; Donta-Bakogianni C; Karayiannis A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Nov; 35(6):426-31. PubMed ID: 17082334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance evaluation and testing of digital intra-oral radiographic systems.
    Doyle P; Finney L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):313-7. PubMed ID: 16461488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of beam energy and filtration on the signal-to-noise ratio of the Dexis intraoral X-ray detector.
    Kitagawa H; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 15140818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Handheld intraoral dental x-ray devices should supplement but not replace conventional radiographic equipment.
    Geist JR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2021 Sep; 132(3):257-259. PubMed ID: 34266769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safe use of X-rays by dentists.
    Govan P
    SADJ; 2013 Mar; 68(2):74-7. PubMed ID: 23951768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating phantom image quality parameters to optimise patient radiation dose in dental digital radiology.
    Gonzalez L; Vano E; Fernandez R; Ziraldo V; Delgado J; Delgado V; Moro J; Ubeda C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 22232776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Panoramic radiography: digital technology fosters efficiency.
    Benson BW; Liang H; Flint DJ
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2011; 32 Spec No 4():6-8. PubMed ID: 22195340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intraoral radiology in general dental practices - a comparison of digital and film-based X-ray systems with regard to radiation protection and dose reduction.
    Anissi HD; Geibel MA
    Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):762-7. PubMed ID: 24648236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of complementary metal oxide semiconductor and charge-coupled device intraoral X-ray detectors using subjective image quality.
    Kitagawa H; Scheetz JP; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):408-11. PubMed ID: 15070845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Intraoral radiography: qualitative study].
    Freyche S; Vazquez L
    Swiss Dent J; 2023 Feb; 133(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 36723432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dependency of dose response of five charge-coupled device-based digital intra-oral radiographic systems on tube voltage.
    Nishikawa K; Shibuya H; Wakoh M; Kuroyanagi K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Nov; 28(6):364-7. PubMed ID: 10578191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of K-shell absorption edge filters on image quality in digital intraoral radiography.
    Shibuya H; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Sep; 90(3):377-84. PubMed ID: 10982962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Panoramic radiography in dental diagnostics.
    Molander B
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 119():1-26. PubMed ID: 8971997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.