These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27720654)

  • 21. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
    Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Intraoral digital radiography: elements of effective imaging.
    Cederberg R
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2012 Oct; 33(9):656-8, 662, 664 ; quiz 665. PubMed ID: 23030728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Digital radiography: state of the art.
    Otis L; Mupparapu M; Mozaffari E
    Pa Dent J (Harrisb); 2000; 67(6):33-4, 42-3. PubMed ID: 11411340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Correction of background noise in direct digital dental radiography.
    Yoshioka T; Kobayashi C; Suda H; Sasaki T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Nov; 25(5):256-62. PubMed ID: 9161179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Quality assurance in dental radiography: intra-oral image quality analysis.
    Bolas A; Fitzgerald M
    J Ir Dent Assoc; 2008 Dec-2009 Jan; 54(6):274-8. PubMed ID: 19189748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Image quality assessment and radiation doses in intraoral radiography.
    Yakoumakis EN; Tierris CE; Stefanou EP; Phanourakis IG; Proukakis CC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 11250637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Radiologic exposure of the dental patient: comparison of the doses delivered by different techniques].
    Jones P; Reychler H; Engels H; Wambersie A
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2007; 62(1):4-24. PubMed ID: 18506961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Update on the biological effects of ionizing radiation, relative dose factors and radiation hygiene.
    White SC; Mallya SM
    Aust Dent J; 2012 Mar; 57 Suppl 1():2-8. PubMed ID: 22376091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Image quality evaluation of eight complementary metal-oxide semiconductor intraoral digital X-ray sensors.
    Teich S; Al-Rawi W; Heima M; Faddoul FF; Goldzweig G; Gutmacher Z; Aizenbud D
    Int Dent J; 2016 Oct; 66(5):264-71. PubMed ID: 27103603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A Comparison of Technique Errors using Two Radiographic Intra-oral Receptor-holding Devices.
    Mauriello SM; Tang Q; Johnson KB; Hadgraft HH; Platin E
    J Dent Hyg; 2015 Dec; 89(6):384-9. PubMed ID: 26684996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of two intraoral CCD sensor systems in terms of image quality and interobserver agreement.
    Schulze D; Rother UJ; Fuhrmann AW; Tietke M
    Int J Comput Dent; 2003 Apr; 6(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 14552151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Reduction of the radiation load in digital X-ray diagnosis].
    Vladimirov LP; Vladimirov IuL; Kozlov AA
    Med Tekh; 2012; (5):32-4. PubMed ID: 23156032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of the response of storage phosphor and film radiography to small variations in X-ray exposure.
    Hildebolt CF; Fletcher G; Yokoyama-Crothers N; Conover GL; Vannier MW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 May; 26(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9442600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Optimisation of conditions of visualisation of dental crowns in dental radiography.
    Michalska A; Rózyło-Kalinowska I; Jurkiewicz-Mazurek M; Rózyło TK
    Ann Univ Mariae Curie Sklodowska Med; 2002; 57(1):106-12. PubMed ID: 12898912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of dose reduction in digital dental panoramic radiography on image quality.
    Dannewitz B; Hassfeld S; Eickholz P; Mühling J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 11803389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Principles of digital imaging.
    van der Stelt PF
    Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Apr; 44(2):237-48, v. PubMed ID: 10740766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. How to improve digital dental radiograph reproducibility: an individualized technique.
    Muratore F; Tripodi D; Teté S; de Fazio P; Festa F
    Int J Comput Dent; 2001 Apr; 4(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 11692661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Technical evaluation of a clinical, bi-planar, digital and upright X-ray imaging unit.
    Kelly C; Delakis I
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2021 Dec; 68(4):475-481. PubMed ID: 34096199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dose optimisation in computed radiography.
    Schreiner-Karoussou A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):139-42. PubMed ID: 16461522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of the automatic exposure compensation on the proximal caries diagnosis.
    Yoshiura K; Nakayama E; Shimizu M; Goto TK; Chikui T; Kawazu T; Okamura K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):140-4. PubMed ID: 15897283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.