These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27720654)

  • 41. Effects of the automatic exposure compensation on the proximal caries diagnosis.
    Yoshiura K; Nakayama E; Shimizu M; Goto TK; Chikui T; Kawazu T; Okamura K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):140-4. PubMed ID: 15897283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Patient dosimetry and image quality in digital radiology from online audit of the X-ray system.
    Vano E; Fernandez JM; Ten JI; Gonzalez L; Guibelalde E; Prieto C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):199-203. PubMed ID: 16461529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Digital radiology using the DIGORA registration technic].
    van der Stelt PF
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 1996; 51(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 9289753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Series: Practical Evaluation of Clinical Image Quality (4): Determination of Image Quality in Digital Radiography System].
    Katayama R
    Igaku Butsuri; 2016; 36(3):166-172. PubMed ID: 28442655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Standards for intraoral radiographic imaging.
    Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):257-9. PubMed ID: 10980558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Does digital imaging decrease patient dose? A pilot study and review of the literature.
    Neofotistou V; Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Schreiner-Karoussou A; Vano E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):204-10. PubMed ID: 16464833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Radiographic digital image enhancement. Part II: transform domain techniques.
    Analoui M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Mar; 30(2):65-77. PubMed ID: 11313724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Quality assurance phantom for digital dental imaging.
    Mah P; McDavid WD; Dove SB
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Nov; 112(5):632-9. PubMed ID: 21862364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Radiographic methods used before removal of mandibular third molars among randomly selected general dental clinics.
    Matzen LH; Petersen LB; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150226. PubMed ID: 26943178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evaluation of image quality parameters of representative intraoral digital radiographic systems.
    Udupa H; Mah P; Dove SB; McDavid WD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Dec; 116(6):774-83. PubMed ID: 24237729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The dynamic range of digital radiographic systems: dose reduction or risk of overexposure?
    Berkhout WE; Beuger DA; Sanderink GC; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 15140814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Effects of differences in pixel size on image characteristics of digital intraoral radiographic systems: a physical and visual evaluation.
    Watanabe H; Kurabayashi T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2022 Mar; 51(3):20210093. PubMed ID: 34914543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Technical note: an assessment of X-ray protective gloves.
    Clasper JC; Pinks T
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Aug; 68(812):917-9. PubMed ID: 7551792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Dental digital radiography.
    Moore WS
    Tex Dent J; 2002 May; 119(5):404-12. PubMed ID: 12046403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison of technique errors of intraoral radiographs taken on film v photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates.
    Zhang W; Huynh CP; Abramovitch K; Leon IL; Arvizu L
    Tex Dent J; 2012 Jun; 129(6):589-96. PubMed ID: 22866414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Image quality measurements and metrics in full field digital mammography: an overview.
    Bosmans H; Carton AK; Rogge F; Zanca F; Jacobs J; Van Ongeval C; Nijs K; Van Steen A; Marchal G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):120-30. PubMed ID: 16461531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A laboratory comparison of three imaging systems for image quality and radiation exposure characteristics.
    Bhaskaran V; Qualtrough AJ; Rushton VE; Worthington HV; Horner K
    Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):645-52. PubMed ID: 16104978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Generation of x rays for medical imaging by high-power lasers: preliminary results.
    Herrlin K; Svahn G; Olsson C; Pettersson H; Tillman C; Persson A; Wahlström CG; Svanberg S
    Radiology; 1993 Oct; 189(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 8372221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Implementation of acceptability criteria for dental radiology in Belgium.
    Clarijs T
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Feb; 153(2):260-3. PubMed ID: 23175642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Controlled diagnosis-oriented enhancement of automatically segmented radiographs in dentistry.
    Koch S; Wagner IV; Seipel S; Schneider W
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1998; 57(1-2):125-31. PubMed ID: 9804009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.