These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27720731)

  • 1. Upgrading and upstaging at radical prostatectomy in the post-prostate-specific antigen screening era: an effect of delayed diagnosis or a shift in patient selection?
    Edmund L; Rotker KL; Lakis NS; Brito JM; Lepe M; Lombardo KA; Renzulli JF; Matoso A
    Hum Pathol; 2017 Jan; 59():87-93. PubMed ID: 27720731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changing Trends in Surgical Management of Prostate Cancer: The End of Overtreatment?
    Huland H; Graefen M
    Eur Urol; 2015 Aug; 68(2):175-8. PubMed ID: 25736732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incidence of upgrading and upstaging in patients with low-volume Gleason score 3+4 prostate cancers at biopsy: finding a new group eligible for active surveillance.
    Park HJ; Ha YS; Park SY; Kim YT; Lee TY; Kim JH; Lee DH; Kim WJ; Kim IY
    Urol Int; 2013; 90(3):301-5. PubMed ID: 23391718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Final pathohistology after radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance (AS).
    Lellig E; Gratzke C; Kretschmer A; Stief C
    World J Urol; 2015 Jul; 33(7):917-22. PubMed ID: 26047652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Decade of Active Surveillance in the PRIAS Study: An Update and Evaluation of the Criteria Used to Recommend a Switch to Active Treatment.
    Bokhorst LP; Valdagni R; Rannikko A; Kakehi Y; Pickles T; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ;
    Eur Urol; 2016 Dec; 70(6):954-960. PubMed ID: 27329565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Limitations in Predicting Organ Confined Prostate Cancer in Patients with Gleason Pattern 4 on Biopsy: Implications for Active Surveillance.
    Perlis N; Sayyid R; Evans A; Van Der Kwast T; Toi A; Finelli A; Kulkarni G; Hamilton R; Zlotta AR; Trachtenberg J; Ghai S; Fleshner NE
    J Urol; 2017 Jan; 197(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 27457260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Older Age Predicts Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Grade Reclassification to Aggressive Prostate Cancer in Men on Active Surveillance.
    Druskin SC; Mamawala M; Tosoian JJ; Epstein JI; Pavlovich CP; Carter HB; Trock BJ
    J Urol; 2019 Jan; 201(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 30114397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Immediate versus delayed radical prostatectomy: updated outcomes following active surveillance of prostate cancer.
    Filippou P; Welty CJ; Cowan JE; Perez N; Shinohara K; Carroll PR
    Eur Urol; 2015 Sep; 68(3):458-63. PubMed ID: 26138041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-Term Outcomes after Deferred Radical Prostatectomy in Men Initially Treated with Active Surveillance.
    Godtman RA; Schafferer M; Pihl CG; Stranne J; Hugosson J
    J Urol; 2018 Oct; 200(4):779-785. PubMed ID: 29730198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction of the Pathologic Gleason Score to Inform a Personalized Management Program for Prostate Cancer.
    Coley RY; Zeger SL; Mamawala M; Pienta KJ; Carter HB
    Eur Urol; 2017 Jul; 72(1):135-141. PubMed ID: 27523594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adverse Disease Features in Gleason Score 3 + 4 "Favorable Intermediate-Risk" Prostate Cancer: Implications for Active Surveillance.
    Morlacco A; Cheville JC; Rangel LJ; Gearman DJ; Karnes RJ
    Eur Urol; 2017 Sep; 72(3):442-447. PubMed ID: 27574819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cribriform morphology predicts upstaging after radical prostatectomy in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer at transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsy.
    Keefe DT; Schieda N; El Hallani S; Breau RH; Morash C; Robertson SJ; Mai KT; Belanger EC; Flood TA
    Virchows Arch; 2015 Oct; 467(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 26229020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter?
    Jin BS; Kang SH; Kim DY; Oh HG; Kim CI; Moon GH; Kwon TG; Park JS
    Korean J Urol; 2015 Sep; 56(9):624-9. PubMed ID: 26366274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictive value of four kallikrein markers for pathologically insignificant compared with aggressive prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens: results from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer section Rotterdam.
    Carlsson S; Maschino A; Schröder F; Bangma C; Steyerberg EW; van der Kwast T; van Leenders G; Vickers A; Lilja H; Roobol MJ
    Eur Urol; 2013 Nov; 64(5):693-9. PubMed ID: 23683475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A biopsy-integrated algorithm for determining Gleason 6 upgrading risk stratifies risk of active surveillance failure in prostate cancer.
    Blute ML; Shiau JM; Truong M; Shi F; Abel EJ; Downs TM; Jarrard DF
    World J Urol; 2017 May; 35(5):729-735. PubMed ID: 27631325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pathologic Outcomes of Gleason 6 Favorable Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With Radical Prostatectomy: Implications for Active Surveillance.
    Yang DD; Mahal BA; Muralidhar V; Vastola ME; Boldbaatar N; Labe SA; Nezolosky MD; Orio PF; King MT; Martin NE; Mouw KW; Trinh QD; Nguyen PL
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Jun; 16(3):226-234. PubMed ID: 29196209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimizing patient selection for prostate monotherapy.
    Lee AK; Schultz D; Renshaw AA; Richie JP; D'Amico AV
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Mar; 49(3):673-7. PubMed ID: 11172948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. African American Race is Not Associated with Risk of Reclassification during Active Surveillance: Results from the Canary Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Study.
    Schenk JM; Newcomb LF; Zheng Y; Faino AV; Zhu K; Nyame YA; Brooks JD; Carroll PR; Cooperberg MR; Dash A; Filson CP; Gleave ME; Liss M; Martin FM; Morgan TM; Nelson PS; Thompson IM; Wagner AA; Lin DW
    J Urol; 2020 Apr; 203(4):727-733. PubMed ID: 31651227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Population based study of predictors of adverse pathology among candidates for active surveillance with Gleason 6 prostate cancer.
    Vellekoop A; Loeb S; Folkvaljon Y; Stattin P
    J Urol; 2014 Feb; 191(2):350-7. PubMed ID: 24071481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Feasibility for active surveillance in biopsy Gleason 3 + 4 prostate cancer: an Australian radical prostatectomy cohort.
    Wong LM; Tang V; Peters J; Costello A; Corcoran N
    BJU Int; 2016 Apr; 117 Suppl 4():82-7. PubMed ID: 27094971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.