BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27720731)

  • 1. Upgrading and upstaging at radical prostatectomy in the post-prostate-specific antigen screening era: an effect of delayed diagnosis or a shift in patient selection?
    Edmund L; Rotker KL; Lakis NS; Brito JM; Lepe M; Lombardo KA; Renzulli JF; Matoso A
    Hum Pathol; 2017 Jan; 59():87-93. PubMed ID: 27720731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changing Trends in Surgical Management of Prostate Cancer: The End of Overtreatment?
    Huland H; Graefen M
    Eur Urol; 2015 Aug; 68(2):175-8. PubMed ID: 25736732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incidence of upgrading and upstaging in patients with low-volume Gleason score 3+4 prostate cancers at biopsy: finding a new group eligible for active surveillance.
    Park HJ; Ha YS; Park SY; Kim YT; Lee TY; Kim JH; Lee DH; Kim WJ; Kim IY
    Urol Int; 2013; 90(3):301-5. PubMed ID: 23391718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Final pathohistology after radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance (AS).
    Lellig E; Gratzke C; Kretschmer A; Stief C
    World J Urol; 2015 Jul; 33(7):917-22. PubMed ID: 26047652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Decade of Active Surveillance in the PRIAS Study: An Update and Evaluation of the Criteria Used to Recommend a Switch to Active Treatment.
    Bokhorst LP; Valdagni R; Rannikko A; Kakehi Y; Pickles T; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ;
    Eur Urol; 2016 Dec; 70(6):954-960. PubMed ID: 27329565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Limitations in Predicting Organ Confined Prostate Cancer in Patients with Gleason Pattern 4 on Biopsy: Implications for Active Surveillance.
    Perlis N; Sayyid R; Evans A; Van Der Kwast T; Toi A; Finelli A; Kulkarni G; Hamilton R; Zlotta AR; Trachtenberg J; Ghai S; Fleshner NE
    J Urol; 2017 Jan; 197(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 27457260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Older Age Predicts Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Grade Reclassification to Aggressive Prostate Cancer in Men on Active Surveillance.
    Druskin SC; Mamawala M; Tosoian JJ; Epstein JI; Pavlovich CP; Carter HB; Trock BJ
    J Urol; 2019 Jan; 201(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 30114397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Immediate versus delayed radical prostatectomy: updated outcomes following active surveillance of prostate cancer.
    Filippou P; Welty CJ; Cowan JE; Perez N; Shinohara K; Carroll PR
    Eur Urol; 2015 Sep; 68(3):458-63. PubMed ID: 26138041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-Term Outcomes after Deferred Radical Prostatectomy in Men Initially Treated with Active Surveillance.
    Godtman RA; Schafferer M; Pihl CG; Stranne J; Hugosson J
    J Urol; 2018 Oct; 200(4):779-785. PubMed ID: 29730198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction of the Pathologic Gleason Score to Inform a Personalized Management Program for Prostate Cancer.
    Coley RY; Zeger SL; Mamawala M; Pienta KJ; Carter HB
    Eur Urol; 2017 Jul; 72(1):135-141. PubMed ID: 27523594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adverse Disease Features in Gleason Score 3 + 4 "Favorable Intermediate-Risk" Prostate Cancer: Implications for Active Surveillance.
    Morlacco A; Cheville JC; Rangel LJ; Gearman DJ; Karnes RJ
    Eur Urol; 2017 Sep; 72(3):442-447. PubMed ID: 27574819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cribriform morphology predicts upstaging after radical prostatectomy in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer at transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsy.
    Keefe DT; Schieda N; El Hallani S; Breau RH; Morash C; Robertson SJ; Mai KT; Belanger EC; Flood TA
    Virchows Arch; 2015 Oct; 467(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 26229020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter?
    Jin BS; Kang SH; Kim DY; Oh HG; Kim CI; Moon GH; Kwon TG; Park JS
    Korean J Urol; 2015 Sep; 56(9):624-9. PubMed ID: 26366274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictive value of four kallikrein markers for pathologically insignificant compared with aggressive prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens: results from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer section Rotterdam.
    Carlsson S; Maschino A; Schröder F; Bangma C; Steyerberg EW; van der Kwast T; van Leenders G; Vickers A; Lilja H; Roobol MJ
    Eur Urol; 2013 Nov; 64(5):693-9. PubMed ID: 23683475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A biopsy-integrated algorithm for determining Gleason 6 upgrading risk stratifies risk of active surveillance failure in prostate cancer.
    Blute ML; Shiau JM; Truong M; Shi F; Abel EJ; Downs TM; Jarrard DF
    World J Urol; 2017 May; 35(5):729-735. PubMed ID: 27631325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pathologic Outcomes of Gleason 6 Favorable Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With Radical Prostatectomy: Implications for Active Surveillance.
    Yang DD; Mahal BA; Muralidhar V; Vastola ME; Boldbaatar N; Labe SA; Nezolosky MD; Orio PF; King MT; Martin NE; Mouw KW; Trinh QD; Nguyen PL
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Jun; 16(3):226-234. PubMed ID: 29196209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimizing patient selection for prostate monotherapy.
    Lee AK; Schultz D; Renshaw AA; Richie JP; D'Amico AV
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Mar; 49(3):673-7. PubMed ID: 11172948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Population based study of predictors of adverse pathology among candidates for active surveillance with Gleason 6 prostate cancer.
    Vellekoop A; Loeb S; Folkvaljon Y; Stattin P
    J Urol; 2014 Feb; 191(2):350-7. PubMed ID: 24071481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Feasibility for active surveillance in biopsy Gleason 3 + 4 prostate cancer: an Australian radical prostatectomy cohort.
    Wong LM; Tang V; Peters J; Costello A; Corcoran N
    BJU Int; 2016 Apr; 117 Suppl 4():82-7. PubMed ID: 27094971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characterization of a "low-risk" cohort of grade group 2 prostate cancer patients: Results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.
    McGinley KF; Sun X; Howard LE; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Cooperberg MR; Freedland SJ
    Int J Urol; 2017 Aug; 24(8):611-617. PubMed ID: 28589550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.