These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27720956)

  • 61. Visual working memory in aphantasia: Retained accuracy and capacity with a different strategy.
    Keogh R; Wicken M; Pearson J
    Cortex; 2021 Oct; 143():237-253. PubMed ID: 34482017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Different representations and strategies in mental rotation.
    Zhao B; Sala SD
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Jul; 71(7):1574-1583. PubMed ID: 28856952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. The Ganzflicker experience: High probability of seeing vivid and complex pseudo-hallucinations with imagery but not aphantasia.
    Königsmark VT; Bergmann J; Reeder RR
    Cortex; 2021 Aug; 141():522-534. PubMed ID: 34172274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Unconscious Imagination and the Mental Imagery Debate.
    Brogaard B; Gatzia DE
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():799. PubMed ID: 28588527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Visual memory, the long and the short of it: A review of visual working memory and long-term memory.
    Schurgin MW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jul; 80(5):1035-1056. PubMed ID: 29687357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. The object-based representation of partially occluded surfaces in short-term visual memory: evidence from image combination.
    Walker P; Miles R
    Mem Cognit; 1999 May; 27(3):553-60. PubMed ID: 10355243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Bibliography of research utilizing the vividness of visual imagery questionnaire.
    Marks DF
    Percept Mot Skills; 1989 Dec; 69(3 Pt 1):707-18. PubMed ID: 2691981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. The genesis of errors in drawing.
    Chamberlain R; Wagemans J
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2016 Jun; 65():195-207. PubMed ID: 27068857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. A return of mental imagery: The pictorial theory of visual perspective-taking.
    Cole GG; Samuel S; Eacott MJ
    Conscious Cogn; 2022 Jul; 102():103352. PubMed ID: 35598517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Individual differences in visual science: What can be learned and what is good experimental practice?
    Mollon JD; Bosten JM; Peterzell DH; Webster MA
    Vision Res; 2017 Dec; 141():4-15. PubMed ID: 29129731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. The factorial structure of individual differences in visual perception.
    Tulver K
    Conscious Cogn; 2019 Aug; 73():102762. PubMed ID: 31176848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Translating experimental paradigms into individual-differences research: Contributions, challenges, and practical recommendations.
    Goodhew SC; Edwards M
    Conscious Cogn; 2019 Mar; 69():14-25. PubMed ID: 30685513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Visual noise reveals category representations.
    Gold JM; Cohen AL; Shiffrin R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Aug; 13(4):649-55. PubMed ID: 17201365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. A description of discrete internal representation schemes for visual pattern discrimination.
    Foster DH
    Biol Cybern; 1980; 38(3):151-7. PubMed ID: 7448254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Conceivability and possibility: some dilemmas for Humeans.
    Berto F; Schoonen T
    Synthese; 2018; 195(6):2697-2715. PubMed ID: 31007295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Individual differences in reaction to meprobamate: a study in visual perception.
    RUTTIGER KF
    J Abnorm Soc Psychol; 1963 Jul; 67():37-43. PubMed ID: 13975716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Individual differences in television comprehension.
    Pezdek K; Simon S; Stoeckert J; Kiely J
    Mem Cognit; 1987 Sep; 15(5):428-35. PubMed ID: 3670061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Great Minds Think Alike? Spatial Search Processes Can Be More Idiosyncratic When Guided by More Accurate Information.
    Król M; Król ME
    Cogn Sci; 2022 Apr; 46(4):e13132. PubMed ID: 35411964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Imagery ability: the individual difference gradient and novel training methods (Commentary on Kraeutner et al. (2018)).
    Eaves DL; Emerson JR; Binks JA; Scott MW; Kenny RPW
    Eur J Neurosci; 2018 May; 47(10):1219-1220. PubMed ID: 29729203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. The nature and importance of individual differences in perception.
    WITKIN HA
    J Pers; 1949 Dec; 18(2):145-70, pl. PubMed ID: 15401103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.